Ann Surg Treat Res.  2018 Nov;95(5):240-248. 10.4174/astr.2018.95.5.240.

ABT-737 ameliorates docetaxel resistance in triple negative breast cancer cell line

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. kiterius@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Biostatistics, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Pathology, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aimed to validate the synergistic effect of ABT-737 on docetaxel using MDA-MB-231, a triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line overexpressing B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2).
METHODS
Western blot analysis was performed to assess expression levels of Bcl-2 family proteins and caspase-related molecules. Cell viability was assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Cell cycle distribution was determined by flow cytometry analysis. Benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp(OMe)-fluoromethylketone (z-VAD-fmk) was used for pretreatment to assess the role of caspases.
RESULTS
Cell viability of MDA-MB-231 after combination treatment with ABT-737 and docetaxel was significantly lower than that after docetaxel or ABT-737 monotherapy based on MTT assay (both P < 0.001), with a combination index of 0.41. The proportion of sub-G1 population after combination treatment was significantly higher than that after docetaxel or ABT-737 monotherapy (P = 0.001, P = 0.003, respectively). Pretreatment with z-VAD-fmk completely restored cell viability of MDA-MB-231 from apoptotic cell death induced by combination therapy (P = 0.001). Although pro-caspase-8 or Bid did not show significant change in expression level, pro-casepase-9 showed significantly decreased expression after combination treatment. Cleaved caspase-3 showed increased expression while poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage was induced after combination treatment. However, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha and aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 totally lost their expression after combination treatment.
CONCLUSION
Combination of ABT-737 with docetaxel elicits synergistic therapeutic effect on MDA-MB-231, a TNBC cell line overexpressing Bcl-2, mainly by activating the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis. Therefore, adjunct of ABT-737 to docetaxel might be a new therapeutic option to overcome docetaxel resistance of TNBCs overexpressing Bcl-2.

Keyword

ABT-737; Bcl-2; Docetaxel; Drug resistance; Triple negative breast neoplasms

MeSH Terms

Aldehyde Dehydrogenase
Apoptosis
B-Lymphocytes
Blotting, Western
Caspase 3
Caspase 8
Caspases
Cell Cycle
Cell Death
Cell Line*
Cell Survival
Drug Resistance
Flow Cytometry
Humans
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms*
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase
Caspase 3
Caspase 8
Caspases

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Western blot analysis for ER, HER2, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w using 6 breast cancer cell lines and MTT assay using MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 after docetaxel or ABT-737 monotherapy. (A) After lysing harvested cells (1 × 106 cells per each cell line), equal amount of cell lysate extracted from 6 breast cancer cell lines using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer was subjected to Western blot analysis using specific antibodies. Signal intensity was normalized to that of β-actin as loading control. MTT assay was performed using MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 (5 × 103 cells per each cell line) after treatment with indicated concentration of docetaxel (B) and ABT-737 (C) for 72 hours. Cell viability (%) was expressed as a percentage of viable cell proportion for treated sample compared to that of untreated control. Values correspond to mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Black squares indicate MDA-MB-231. White squares indicate MDA-MB-231. Statistical significance was assessed by unpaired Student t-test. ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma-2; MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; NS, not significant. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. ****P < 0.0001.

  • Fig. 2 Cytotoxicity evaluation of docetaxel, ABT-737, and combination treatment using MDA-MB-231. (A) MDA-MB-231 cells (5 × 103) were treated with 10 nM docetaxel and/or 1 µM ABT-737 for 48 hours. Cellular morphology was observed by phase contrast microscopy (×100). White arrow indicates a suspended shrunk cell. Black arrow points to an attached surviving cell. (B) MDA-MB-231 cells (5 × 103) were treated with 20 nM docetaxel and/or 1 µM ABT-737 for 72 hours. Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay. Absorbance was measured at wavelength of 570 nm. Values correspond to mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed by unpaired Student t-test. NS, not significant. ***P < 0.001.

  • Fig. 3 Cell cycle analysis. (A) MDA-MB-231 cells (1 × 105) were treated with 10 nM docetaxel and/or 1 µM ABT-737 for indicated time periods and stained with 50 µg/mL of propidium iodide including 100 µg/mL of RNase A for 30 minutes at 37℃. Top, middle, and bottom rows were treated with ABT-737, docetaxel, and both drugs, respectively. Graphs depict data of flow cytometry results after treatment for 72 hours according to cell cycle (B) and treatment agents (C). Values correspond to mean ± standard deviation of 3 independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed by unpaired Student t-test. NS, not significant. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01.

  • Fig. 4 MTT assay and cell cycle analysis after docetaxel, ABT-737, and combination treatment using MDA-MB-231 with or without pretreatment of z-VAD-fmk. Twenty µM of z-VAD-fmk was pretreated for 1 hour before 10 nM docetaxel, 1 µM ABT-737, or combination treatment for 48 hours. (A) Cell viability after treatment was determined by MTT assay. Statistical significance was assessed by unpaired Student t-test. Values correspond to mean ± standard deviation of five independent experiments. (B) After treatment with docetaxel, ABT-737, or combination therapy, MDA-MB-231 cells (1 × 105) were stained with 50 µg/mL of propidium iodide with (bottom) or without (top) pretreatment of 20 µM z-VAD-fmk. (C) Percentage of each phase is shown as 100% stacked bar chart. MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; NS, not significant. **P < 0.01.

  • Fig. 5 Expression of apoptosis related molecules by Western blot. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with 10 nM docetaxel, 1 µM ABT-737, or combination of the two drugs for 24 hours and 48 hours. After lysing harvested cells (1 × 106), 40 µg of protein from each cell lysate was loaded and blotted with specific antibodies, including caspase-8, caspase-9, cleaved caspase-3, Bid, and PARP antibodies. Expression levels of ALDH1 and HIF-1α were also tested under the same condition. β-actin was used as loading control. PARP, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase; ALDH1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor.


Reference

1. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:1938–1948.
Article
2. Carey L, Winer E, Viale G, Cameron D, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010; 7:683–692.
Article
3. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13(15 Pt 1):4429–4434.
Article
4. Czabotar PE, Lessene G, Strasser A, Adams JM. Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014; 15:49–63.
Article
5. Tsujimoto Y, Finger LR, Yunis J, Nowell PC, Croce CM. Cloning of the chromosome breakpoint of neoplastic B cells with the t(14;18) chromosome translocation. Science. 1984; 226:1097–1099.
Article
6. Hwang KT, Woo JW, Shin HC, Kim HS, Ahn SK, Moon HG, et al. Prognostic influence of BCL2 expression in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2012; 131:E1109–E1119.
Article
7. Hwang KT, Han W, Kim J, Moon HG, Oh S, Song YS, et al. Prognostic influence of Bcl2 on molecular subtypes of breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2017; 20:54–64.
Article
8. Dawson SJ, Makretsov N, Blows FM, Driver KE, Provenzano E, Le Quesne J, et al. BCL2 in breast cancer: a favourable prognostic marker across molecular subtypes and independent of adjuvant therapy received. Br J Cancer. 2010; 103:668–675.
Article
9. Callagy GM, Webber MJ, Pharoah PD, Caldas C. Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008; 8:153.
Article
10. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, Andre F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26:1275–1281.
Article
11. Cragg MS, Harris C, Strasser A, Scott CL. Unleashing the power of inhibitors of oncogenic kinases through BH3 mimetics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009; 9:321–326.
Article
12. Oakes SR, Vaillant F, Lim E, Lee L, Breslin K, Feleppa F, et al. Sensitization of BCL-2-expressing breast tumors to chemotherapy by the BH3 mimetic ABT-737. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109:2766–2771.
Article
13. Panayotopoulou EG, Muller AK, Borries M, Busch H, Hu G, Lev S. Targeting of apoptotic pathways by SMAC or BH3 mimetics distinctly sensitizes paclitaxel-resistant triple negative breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:45088–45104.
Article
14. Kutuk O, Letai A. Alteration of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway is key to acquired paclitaxel resistance and can be reversed by ABT-737. Cancer Res. 2008; 68:7985–7994.
Article
15. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72:248–254.
Article
16. Witham J, Valenti MR, De-Haven-Brandon AK, Vidot S, Eccles SA, Kaye SB, et al. The Bcl-2/Bcl-XL family inhibitor ABT-737 sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to carboplatin. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13:7191–7198.
Article
17. Chou TC, Talalay P. Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1984; 22:27–55.
Article
18. Abramson VG, Lehmann BD, Ballinger TJ, Pietenpol JA. Subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer: implications for therapy. Cancer. 2015; 121:8–16.
Article
19. Mayer IA, Abramson VG, Lehmann BD, Pietenpol JA. New strategies for triple-negative breast cancer--deciphering the heterogeneity. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20:782–790.
Article
20. Rooswinkel RW, van de Kooij B, Verheij M, Borst J. Bcl-2 is a better ABT-737 target than Bcl-xL or Bcl-w and only Noxa overcomes resistance mediated by Mcl-1, Bfl-1, or Bcl-B. Cell Death Dis. 2012; 3:e366.
Article
21. Hotchkiss RS, Strasser A, McDunn JE, Swanson PE. Cell death. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1570–1583.
Article
22. Danial NN, Korsmeyer SJ. Cell death: critical control points. Cell. 2004; 116:205–219.
23. Ajabnoor GM, Crook T, Coley HM. Paclitaxel resistance is associated with switch from apoptotic to autophagic cell death in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2012; 3:e260.
Article
24. Kepp O, Galluzzi L, Lipinski M, Yuan J, Kroemer G. Cell death assays for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011; 10:221–237.
Article
25. Ichim G, Tait SW. A fate worse than death: apoptosis as an oncogenic process. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016; 16:539–548.
Article
26. Herceg Z, Wang ZQ. Functions of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in DNA repair, genomic integrity and cell death. Mutat Res. 2001; 477:97–110.
27. Samanta D, Gilkes DM, Chaturvedi P, Xiang L, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factors are required for chemotherapy resistance of breast cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111:E5429–E5438.
Article
28. Chen CH, Ferreira JC, Gross ER, Mochly-Rosen D. Targeting aldehyde dehydrogenase 2: new therapeutic opportunities. Physiol Rev. 2014; 94:1–34.
Article
29. Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, et al. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 2007; 1:555–567.
Article
30. Kida K, Ishikawa T, Yamada A, Shimada K, Narui K, Sugae S, et al. Effect of ALDH1 on prognosis and chemoresistance by breast cancer subtype. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 156:261–269.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr