J Periodontal Implant Sci.  2018 Dec;48(6):383-394. 10.5051/jpis.2018.48.6.383.

Determination of the optimal diabetes duration for bone regeneration experiments in an alloxan-induced diabetic rabbit calvarial defect model

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Periodontology, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry, Gangneung, Korea. periojk@gwnu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Anatomy, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry, Gangneung, Korea.
  • 3Research Institute for Dental Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea. cwy@gwnu.ac.kr
  • 4Department of Metal and Materials Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea.
  • 5Wellnanos Co., Ltd., Gangneung, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the optimal diabetes duration for bone regeneration experiments in an alloxan monohydrate (ALX)-induced diabetic rabbit calvarial defect model by evaluating the association between diabetes duration and bone healing capacity.
METHODS
Twenty-four New Zealand white rabbits were used. Twenty-two rabbits were injected with 100 mg/kg of ALX to induce experimental diabetes. These rabbits were divided into 4 groups, including a control group and groups with diabetes durations of 1 week (group 1), 2 weeks (group 2), and 4 weeks (group 3). Calvarial defects were created at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after ALX injection and in the control rabbits. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning was performed on the day of surgery and at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery. The rabbits were sacrificed 4 weeks after surgery, followed by histological and immunofluorescence analysis.
RESULTS
The diabetic state of all diabetic rabbits was well-maintained throughout the experiment. Reconstructed 3-dimensional CBCT imaging showed more rapid and prominent bone regeneration in the control group than in the experimental groups. Histological staining showed notable bone regeneration in the control group, in contrast to scarce bone formation in the experimental groups. The appearance and immunoreactivity of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B and osteoprotegerin did not show notable differences among the groups.
CONCLUSION
ALX administration at 100 mg/kg successfully induced experimental diabetes in rabbits. The effect of diabetes on bone healing was evident when the interval between diabetes induction and the intervention was ≥1 week.

Keyword

Alloxan; Bone regeneration; Cone-beam computed tomography; Experimental diabetes mellitus; Rabbits

MeSH Terms

Alloxan
Animals
Bone Regeneration*
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Osteogenesis
Osteoprotegerin
Rabbits
Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa B
Alloxan
Osteoprotegerin
Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa B

Figure

  • Figure 1 FBS levels of diabetic rabbits. FBS levels over 200 mg/dL were classified as indicating diabetes. All rabbits showed stable FBS throughout the experiment. No rabbits showed relapse of FBS. FBS: fasting blood sugar, W: weeks.

  • Figure 2 Reconstructed 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography image. The control group (A) showed relatively rapid and prominent bone regeneration compared to groups 1 (B), 2 (C), and 3 (D).

  • Figure 3 Hematoxylin and eosin staining and Masson trichrome staining of specimens (scale bae=1 mm). The control group (B) showed notable bone regeneration, whereas groups 1 (C), 2 (D), and 3 (E) showed scarce bone regeneration. (A) baseline. Black arrowheads indicate defect margin. CTL: control, DM: diabetes mellitus, W: weeks.

  • Figure 4 Immunofluorescence analysis of OPG and RANKL, as well as merged images (Scale bar = 25 um). There were no obvious differences among the groups. The relative optical density was derived from the immunofluorescence analysis. No statistically significant difference was shown among groups. (A) baseline, (B) control group, (C) group 1, (D) group 2, (E) group 3. OPG: osteoprotegerin, RANKL: receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B, CTL: control, DM: diabetes mellitus, IR: immunoreactivity, W: weeks.


Reference

1. Stavropoulos A, Sculean A, Bosshardt DD, Buser D, Klinge B. Pre-clinical in vivo models for the screening of bone biomaterials for oral/craniofacial indications: focus on small-animal models. Periodontol 2000. 2015; 68:55–65.
Article
2. Kantarci A, Hasturk H, Van Dyke TE. Animal models for periodontal regeneration and peri-implant responses. Periodontol 2000. 2015; 68:66–82.
Article
3. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20:1183–1197.
4. Korean Diabetes Association. Korean diabetes fact sheet 2015 [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Diabetes Association;c2011. cited 2016 Aug 18. Available from: http://www.diabetes.or.kr/.
5. Goodman WG, Hori MT. Diminished bone formation in experimental diabetes. Relationship to osteoid maturation and mineralization. Diabetes. 1984; 33:825–831.
Article
6. Nyomba BL, Verhaeghe J, Thomasset M, Lissens W, Bouillon R. Bone mineral homeostasis in spontaneously diabetic BB rats. I. Abnormal vitamin D metabolism and impaired active intestinal calcium absorption. Endocrinology. 1989; 124:565–572.
Article
7. Shires R, Teitelbaum SL, Bergfeld MA, Fallon MD, Slatopolsky E, Avioli LV. The effect of streptozotocin-induced chronic diabetes mellitus on bone and mineral homeostasis in the rat. J Lab Clin Med. 1981; 97:231–240.
8. Morris HF, Ochi S, Winkler S. Implant survival in patients with type 2 diabetes: placement to 36 months. Ann Periodontol. 2000; 5:157–165.
Article
9. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20:569–577.
10. Nevins ML, Karimbux NY, Weber HP, Giannobile WV, Fiorellini JP. Wound healing around endosseous implants in experimental diabetes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13:620–629.
Article
11. Giglio MJ, Giannunzio G, Olmedo D, Guglielmotti MB. Histomorphometric study of bone healing around laminar implants in experimental diabetes. Implant Dent. 2000; 9:143–149.
Article
12. Lalla E, Lamster IB, Drury S, Fu C, Schmidt AM. Hyperglycemia, glycoxidation and receptor for advanced glycation endproducts: potential mechanisms underlying diabetic complications, including diabetes-associated periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2000; 23:50–62.
Article
13. Taylor GW, Burt BA, Becker MP, Genco RJ, Shlossman M, Knowler WC, et al. Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and alveolar bone loss progression over 2 years. J Periodontol. 1998; 69:76–83.
Article
14. Balint E, Szabo P, Marshall CF, Sprague SM. Glucose-induced inhibition of in vitro bone mineralization. Bone. 2001; 28:21–28.
Article
15. Terada M, Inaba M, Yano Y, Hasuma T, Nishizawa Y, Morii H, et al. Growth-inhibitory effect of a high glucose concentration on osteoblast-like cells. Bone. 1998; 22:17–23.
Article
16. Brownlee M, Cerami A, Vlassara H. Advanced glycosylation end products in tissue and the biochemical basis of diabetic complications. N Engl J Med. 1988; 318:1315–1321.
Article
17. Santana RB, Xu L, Chase HB, Amar S, Graves DT, Trackman PC. A role for advanced glycation end products in diminished bone healing in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2003; 52:1502–1510.
Article
18. Lalla E, Lamster IB, Schmidt AM. Enhanced interaction of advanced glycation end products with their cellular receptor RAGE: implications for the pathogenesis of accelerated periodontal disease in diabetes. Ann Periodontol. 1998; 3:13–19.
Article
19. Brussee V, Guo G, Dong Y, Cheng C, Martinez JA, Smith D, et al. Distal degenerative sensory neuropathy in a long-term type 2 diabetes rat model. Diabetes. 2008; 57:1664–1673.
Article
20. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:977–986.
Article
21. Kamiya H, Zhang W, Sima AA. Degeneration of the Golgi and neuronal loss in dorsal root ganglia in diabetic BioBreeding/Worcester rats. Diabetologia. 2006; 49:2763–2774.
Article
22. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998; 352:837–853.
23. Follak N, Klöting I, Wolf E, Merk H. Histomorphometric evaluation of the influence of the diabetic metabolic state on bone defect healing depending on the defect size in spontaneously diabetic BB/OK rats. Bone. 2004; 35:144–152.
Article
24. Shyng YC, Devlin H, Sloan P. The effect of streptozotocin-induced experimental diabetes mellitus on calvarial defect healing and bone turnover in the rat. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 30:70–74.
Article
25. Lenzen S. The mechanisms of alloxan- and streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Diabetologia. 2008; 51:216–226.
Article
26. Lackey RW, Bunde CA, Gill AL, Harris LC. Glycogen in alloxan-treated rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1944; 57:191–194.
Article
27. Zhao ZH, Watschinger B, Brown CD, Beyer MM, Friedman EA. Variations of susceptibility to alloxan induced diabetes in the rabbit. Horm Metab Res. 1987; 19:534–537.
Article
28. Nath MC, Gadgil JS, Hatwalne VG. Studies on alloxan diabetes. I. Increase of susceptibility caused by acetoacetate. Biochem J. 1953; 53:481–483.
Article
29. Hadour G, Ferrera R, Sebbag L, Forrat R, Delaye J, de Lorgeril M. Improved myocardial tolerance to ischaemia in the diabetic rabbit. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998; 30:1869–1875.
Article
30. Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39:323–335.
Article
31. Greenwald JA, Mehrara BJ, Spector JA, Chin GS, Steinbrech DS, Saadeh PB, et al. Biomolecular mechanisms of calvarial bone induction: immature versus mature dura mater. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105:1382–1392.
Article
32. Hsu H, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Solovyev I, Colombero A, Timms E, et al. Tumor necrosis factor receptor family member RANK mediates osteoclast differentiation and activation induced by osteoprotegerin ligand. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96:3540–3545.
Article
33. Horowitz MC, Xi Y, Wilson K, Kacena MA. Control of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption by members of the TNF family of receptors and ligands. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001; 12:9–18.
Article
34. Crotti T, Smith MD, Hirsch R, Soukoulis S, Weedon H, Capone M, et al. Receptor activator NF kappaB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) protein expression in periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2003; 38:380–387.
Article
35. Rees DA, Alcolado JC. Animal models of diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2005; 22:359–370.
Article
36. Wang J, Wan R, Mo Y, Zhang Q, Sherwood LC, Chien S. Creating a long-term diabetic rabbit model. Exp Diabetes Res. 2010; 2010:289614.
Article
37. Mir SH, Darzi MM. Histopathological abnormalities of prolonged alloxan-induced diabetes mellitus in rabbits. Int J Exp Pathol. 2009; 90:66–73.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JPIS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr