Anesth Pain Med.  2017 Jul;12(3):224-229. 10.17085/apm.2017.12.3.224.

Morphologic changes in the spinal cord following intrathecal palonosetron-HCl injection in rats

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea. jbkim@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Intravenous palonosetron-HCl, a second-generation antagonist of selective serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) receptors, can prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). 5-HT3 receptors are abundant in the lower brainstem and the substantia gelatinosa of the spinal cord, which provides a theoretical rationale for neuraxial administration of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for CINV, PONV, and opioid-induced nausea and vomiting. However, there are no reports of neuraxial administration of palonosetron-HCl. Before neuraxial administration of a drug is accepted for clinical use, its safety must be proven. This study was conducted to determine whether neuraxial administration of palonosetron-HCl produces neurologic injury.
METHODS
Male Sprague-Dawley rats under general anesthesia were catheterized intrathecally and the catheter tip was advanced caudally to the L1 vertebra. After 7 days, 20 µl of normal saline (N group, n = 6) or 20 µl (1 µg) of palonosetron-HCl (P group, n = 6) were injected intrathecally once per day for 2 weeks. Neurotoxic changes were evaluated by light microscopy (LM) and electron microscopy (EM) of the spinal cord. Behavioral changes were also evaluated in both groups.
RESULTS
One of the N group rats and three of the P group rats demonstrated abnormal behavior during intrathecal drug injection, but otherwise their behavior was normal. The spinal cords of the N group did not have any abnormal findings by LM or EM. The spinal cords of the P group had multiple vacuoles in the white matter by LM, especially in the dorsal funiculus, and EM revealed myelin, axonal, and mitochondrial swelling.
CONCLUSIONS
Results suggest that chronic intrathecal administration of palonosetron-HCl produced microscopic morphologic changes in the spinal cords of rats.

Keyword

Microscopic; Palonosetron; Rats; Spinal injections

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia, General
Animals
Axons
Brain Stem
Catheters
Humans
Injections, Spinal
Male
Microscopy
Microscopy, Electron
Mitochondrial Swelling
Myelin Sheath
Nausea
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Rats*
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3
Serotonin
Spinal Cord*
Spine
Substantia Gelatinosa
Vacuoles
Vomiting
White Matter
Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3
Serotonin

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Light microscopy of rat spinal cords stained with toluidine blue. (A, B) Spinal cord of a administered rat normal saline (A: 100×, B: 400×). (C, D) Spinal cord of a rat administered palonosetron-HCl (C: 100×, D: 400×). A and C demonstrate no identifiable hemorrhage and no necrosis, but C has many vacuoles (arrows) in the dorsal funiculus. B has normal myelin and axons. D has thinly myelinated, swollen, and degenerating axons (arrows).

  • Fig. 2 Electron microscopy of rat spinal cords. The spinal cord of a rat administered normal saline (A) and a rat administered palonosetron-HCl (B–D). (A) Compact and myelinated axons. (B) Myelinated axons with separation of the inner lamellae (arrow) creating fluid-filled spaces within the myelin. Axons surrounded by glial cell (arrow head). (C) Thinly myelinated spinal cord with swollen axons (arrow head) and intramyelinic fluid accumulation (arrow). (D) Hypertrophied and degenerated mitochondria (arrow) in the thinly myelinated axon. Black bars represent 1 μm in A and C, 2 μm in B, and 0.5 μm in D.

  • Fig. 3 Light and electron microscopy of the intrathecal catheter in both groups. (A) Light microscopy (40×) of the intrathecal catheter (arrow). (B) and (C) Electron microscopy of tissue surrounding the intrathecal catheter. A macrophage (arrow) can be seen in B, and neutrophils in C (arrows). Black bars in B and C represent 2 μm.


Reference

1. Schug SA, Saunders D, Kurowski I, Paech MJ. Neuraxial drug administration: a review of treatment options for anaesthesia and analgesia. CNS Drugs. 2006; 20:917–33. DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200620110-00005. PMID: 17044729.
2. Yang LP, Scott LJ. Palonosetron: in the prevention of nausea and vomiting. Drugs. 2009; 69:2257–78. DOI: 10.2165/11200980-000000000-00000. PMID: 19852528.
3. Bunce KT, Tyers MB. The role of 5-HT in postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 1992; 69(7 Suppl 1):S60–2. DOI: 10.1093/bja/69.supplement_1.60S.
4. Raphael JH, Norton AC. Antiemetic efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in laparoscopic surgery: randomized, double-blind comparison with metoclopramide. Br J Anaesth. 1993; 71:845–8. DOI: 10.1093/bja/71.6.845.
5. Han DW, Hong SW, Kwon JY, Lee JW, Kim KJ. Epidural ondansetron is more effective to prevent postoperative pruritus and nausea than intravenous ondansetron in elective cesarean delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86:683–7. DOI: 10.1080/00016340701302616. PMID: 17520399.
6. Moon YE, Joo J, Kim JE, Lee Y. Anti-emetic effect of ondansetron and palonosetron in thyroidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 108:417–22. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer423. PMID: 22277663.
7. Yaksh TL, Rudy TA. Chronic catheterization of the spinal subarachnoid space. Physiol Behav. 1976; 17:1031–6. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(76)90029-9.
8. Navari RM. Palonosetron: a second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist. Future Oncol. 2006; 2:591–602. DOI: 10.2217/14796694.2.5.591. PMID: 17026451.
9. Rojas C, Stathis M, Thomas AG, Massuda EB, Alt J, Zhang J, et al. Palonosetron exhibits unique molecular interactions with the 5-HT3 receptor. Anesth Analg. 2008; 107:469–78. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318172fa74. PMID: 18633025.
10. Eisenberg P, Figueroa-Vadillo J, Zamora R, Charu V, Hajdenberg J, Cartmell A, et al. Improved prevention of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with palonosetron, a pharmacologically novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist: results of a phase III, single-dose trial versus dolasetron. Cancer. 2003; 98:2473–82. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11817. PMID: 14635083.
11. Gralla R, Lichinitser M, Van Der Vegt S, Sleeboom H, Mezger J, Peschel C, et al. Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron. Ann Oncol. 2003; 14:1570–7. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg417. PMID: 14504060.
12. Lacassie HJ, Schultz JR, Cummings TJ, Morris R, Trasti SL, Reynolds JD. Behavioural testing and histological assessments of rabbit spinal cord following intrathecal administration of ondansetron. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006; 33:798–801. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2006.04442.x. PMID: 16922809.
13. Waeber C, Hoyer D, Palacios JM. 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptors in the human brain: autoradiographic visualization using [3H]ICS 205-930. Neuroscience. 1989; 31:393–400. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90382-5.
14. Morales M, Battenberg E, de Lecea L, Sanna PP, Bloom FE. Cellular and subcellular immunolocalization of the type 3 serotonin receptor in the rat central nervous system. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1996; 36:251–60. DOI: 10.1016/0169-328X(96)88406-3.
15. Vranken JH, Troost D, Wegener JT, Kruis MR, van der Vegt MH. Neuropathological findings after continuous intrathecal administration of S(+)-ketamine for the management of neuropathic cancer pain. Pain. 2005; 117:231–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.06.014. PMID: 16098665.
16. Adornato B, Lampert P. Status spongiosus of nervous tissue. Electron microscopic studies. Acta Neuropathol. 1971; 19:271–89. DOI: 10.1007/BF00692148. PMID: 5004121.
17. Yamashita A, Matsumoto M, Matsumoto S, Itoh M, Kawai K, Sakabe T. A comparison of the neurotoxic effects on the spinal cord of tetracaine, lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine administered intrathecally in rabbits. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97:512–9. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068885.78816.5B. PMID: 12873946.
18. Oka S, Matsumoto M, Ohtake K, Kiyoshima T, Nakakimura K, Sakabe T. The addition of epinephrine to tetracaine injected intrathecally sustains an increase in glutamate concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid and worsens neuronal injury. Anesth Analg. 2001; 93:1050–7. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200110000-00051. PMID: 11574382.
19. Coombs DW, Fratkin JD. Neurotoxicology of spinal agents. Anesthesiology. 1987; 66:724–6. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198706000-00002.
20. Gordh T Jr, Post C, Olsson Y. Evaluation of the toxicity of subarachnoid clonidine, guanfacine, and a substance P-antagonist on rat spinal cord and nerve roots: light and electron microscopic observations after chronic intrathecal administration. Anesth Analg. 1986; 65:1303–11. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-198612000-00010. PMID: 2430489.
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr