1. Nachemson AL. The lumbar spine, an orthopaedic challenge. Spine. 1976; 1:59–71.
Article
2. Mooney V. Presidential address. International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine. Dallas, 1986. Where is the pain coming from? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12:754–759.
Article
3. Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:363–370.
Article
4. Pauza KJ, Howell S, Dreyfuss P, Peloza JH, Dawson K, Bogduk N. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. Spine J. 2004; 4:27–35.
Article
5. Shuff C, An HS. Artificial disc replacement: the new solution for discogenic low back pain? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005; 34:8–12.
6. Buenaventura RM, Shah RV, Patel V, Benyamin R, Singh V. Systematic review of discography as a diagnostic test for spinal pain: an update. Pain Physician. 2007; 10:147–164.
7. Carragee EJ, Lincoln T, Parmar VS, Alamin T. A gold standard evaluation of the "discogenic pain" diagnosis as determined by provocative discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31:2115–2123.
Article
8. Ohtori S, Kinoshita T, Yamashita M, Inoue G, Yamauchi K, Koshi T, et al. Results of surgery for discogenic low back pain: a randomized study using discography versus discoblock for diagnosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34:1345–1348.
9. Ohtori S, Koshi T, Yamashita M, Yamauchi K, Inoue G, Suzuki M, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of selected patients with discogenic low back pain: a small-sized randomized trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36:347–354.
Article
10. Mirza SK, Deyo RA. Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32:816–823.
Article
11. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22:2807–2812.
12. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73:802–808.
Article
13. Ploumis A, Pinto MR, Schellhas KP. Disc space injection with marcaine as a method to evaluate painful nonunion of an interbody fusion device: a case report. Spine J. 2007; 7:74–78.
Article
14. Vamvanij V, Fredrickson BE, Thorpe JM, Stadnick ME, Yuan HA. Surgical treatment of internal disc disruption: an outcome study of four fusion tec hniques. J Spinal Disord. 1998; 11:375–382.
15. Chu CR, Izzo NJ, Papas NE, Fu FH. In vitro exposure to 0.5% bupivacaine is cytotoxic to bovine articular chondrocytes. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22:693–699.
Article
16. Dogan N, Erdem AF, Erman Z, Kizilkaya M. The effects of bupivacaine and neostigmine on articular cartilage and synovium in the rabbit knee joint. J Int Med Res. 2004; 32:513–519.
Article
17. Gomoll AH, Kang RW, Williams JM, Bach BR, Cole BJ. Chondrolysis after continuous intra-articular bupivacaine infusion: an experimental model investigating chondrotoxicity in the rabbit shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22:813–819.
Article
18. Lee H, Sowa G, Vo N, Vadala G, O'Connell S, Studer R, et al. Effect of bupivacaine on intervertebral disc cell viability. Spine J. 2010; 10:159–166.
Article
19. Wang D, Vo NV, Sowa GA, Hartman RA, Ngo K, Choe SR, et al. Bupivacaine decreases cell viability and matrix protein synthesis in an intervertebral disc organ model system. Spine J. 2011; 11:139–146.
Article
20. Chu CR, Coyle CH, Chu CT, Szczodry M, Seshadri V, Karpie JC, et al. In vivo effects of single intra-articular injection of 0.5% bupivacaine on articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92:599–608.
Article
21. Ohtori S, Inoue G, Orita S, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kishida S, et al. No acceleration of intervertebral disc degeneration after a single injection of bupivacaine in young age group with follow-up of 5 years. Asian Spine J. 2013; 7:212–217.
Article