Blood Res.  2013 Sep;48(3):198-205. 10.5045/br.2013.48.3.198.

The impact of novel therapeutic agents before and after frontline autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

Affiliations
  • 1Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ckmin@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Novel agents (NAs) such as thalidomide and bortezomib have been administered in combination with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) to effectively treat multiple myeloma (MM). However, whether NAs perform better as induction treatments prior to transplantation, or as post-transplant maintenance therapies remains unclear.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed 106 consecutive patients with MM who underwent ASCT within 1 year of diagnosis as first-line therapy.
RESULTS
Eighty-seven (82.1%) patients received NAs before ASCT, whereas 68 (64.2%) received NAs after ASCT. NAs were administered to each patient as follows: before ASCT alone (N=29, 27.4%), after ASCT alone (N=10, 9.4%) or both before and after ASCT (N=58, 54.7%). High-quality rates before and after ASCT were significantly higher for patients who received NAs as induction treatment compared to those who did not receive pre-transplant NAs. At a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 42.8% and 70.2%, respectively. The PFS and OS were significantly higher in patients with NAs as post-transplant maintenance treatment (P=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively), but not in those with NAs as pre-transplant induction treatment. The PFS of patients with NAs before and after ASCT was higher than that of the patients with NAs as induction therapy alone (P=0.05). Age, serum beta2-microglobulin level, complete response after ASCT, and NA use post-ASCT independently predicted survival outcomes.
CONCLUSION
These findings suggest that integration of NAs post-ASCT could benefit patients with MM undergoing ASCT. Induction therapy using NAs also improves high-quality response rates before and after ASCT.

Keyword

Multiple myeloma; Novel agents; Autologous stem cell transplantation; Induction and maintenance treatment

MeSH Terms

Boronic Acids
Disease-Free Survival
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Multiple Myeloma
Plant Extracts
Pyrazines
Retrospective Studies
Stem Cell Transplantation
Stem Cells
Thalidomide
Transplants
Bortezomib
Boronic Acids
Plant Extracts
Pyrazines
Thalidomide

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Patient disposition. Abbreviations: G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; PBPC, peripheral blood progenitor cell; VAD, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Progression-free survival according to novel agent use. (B) Overall survival according to novel agent use. Abbreviations: ASCT, autologous stem-cell transplantation; NAs, novel agents; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival.

  • Fig. 3 Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival and overall survival according to the treatment time of novel agents. Abbreviations: ASCT, autologous stem-cell transplantation; NAs, novel agents; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

  • Fig. 4 Influence of response (≥VGPR vs.


Reference

1. Laubach JP, Mahindra A, Mitsiades CS, et al. The use of novel agents in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2009; 23:2222–2232. PMID: 19741729.
Article
2. van de Donk NW, Lokhorst HM, Dimopoulos M, et al. Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011; 37:266–283. PMID: 20863623.
Article
3. Reece DE. Posttransplantation maintenance therapy and optimal frontline therapy in myeloma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011; 2011:197–204. PMID: 22160034.
Article
4. Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006; 20:1467–1473. PMID: 16855634.
Article
5. Rajkumar SV, Harousseau JL, Durie B, et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood. 2011; 117:4691–4695. PMID: 21292775.
Article
6. Eom KS, Min CK, Lee S, et al. Efficacy of up-front treatment with a double stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006; 36:432–438. PMID: 16782727.
Article
7. Min CK, Lee MJ, Eom KS, et al. Bortezomib in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic agents for multiple myeloma compared with bortezomib alone. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007; 37:961–968. PMID: 18156171.
Article
8. Barlogie B, Smith L, Alexanian R. Effective treatment of advanced multiple myeloma refractory to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med. 1984; 310:1353–1356. PMID: 6546971.
Article
9. Feyler S, Rawstron A, Jackson G, Snowden JA, Cocks K, Johnson RJ. Thalidomide maintenance following high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma: a UK myeloma forum phase 2 study. Br J Haematol. 2007; 139:429–433. PMID: 17910633.
Article
10. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958; 53:457–481.
Article
11. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1972; 34:187–220.
Article
12. Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J, et al. Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26:5775–5782. PMID: 19001321.
13. Kim JS, Kim K, Cheong JW, et al. Complete remission status before autologous stem cell transplantation is an important prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing upfront single autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009; 15:463–470. PMID: 19285634.
Article
14. Kumar SK, Dingli D, Dispenzieri A, et al. Impact of pretransplant therapy in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma undergoing autologous SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008; 41:1013–1019. PMID: 18332915.
Article
15. Rabin N, Percy L, Khan I, Quinn J, D'Sa S, Yong KL. Improved response with post-ASCT consolidation by low dose thalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone as first line treatment for multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2012; 158:499–505. PMID: 22712536.
Article
16. Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Marit G, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:1782–1791. PMID: 22571202.
Article
17. Neben K, Lokhorst HM, Jauch A, et al. Administration of bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcome in multiple myeloma patients with deletion 17p. Blood. 2012; 119:940–948. PMID: 22160383.
Article
18. Giralt S. Stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: current and future status. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011; 2011:191–196. PMID: 22160033.
Article
19. Gertz MA, Kumar S, Lacy MQ, et al. Stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: impact of response failure with thalidomide or lenalidomide induction. Blood. 2010; 115:2348–2353. quiz 2560. PMID: 20089967.
Article
20. Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28:4621–4629. PMID: 20823406.
Article
21. Lokhorst HM, van der Holt B, Zweegman S, et al. A randomized phase 3 study on the effect of thalidomide combined with adriamycin, dexamethasone, and high-dose melphalan, followed by thalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010; 115:1113–1120. PMID: 19880501.
Article
22. Wang L, Ran X, Wang B, Sheng Z, Liu L. Novel agents-based regimens as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hematol Oncol. 2012; 30:57–61. PMID: 21809367.
Article
23. Cavo M, Rajkumar SV, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2011; 117:6063–6073. PMID: 21447828.
Article
24. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Leyvraz S, et al. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006; 108:3289–3294. PMID: 16873668.
Article
25. Spencer A, Prince HM, Roberts AW, et al. Consolidation therapy with low-dose thalidomide and prednisolone prolongs the survival of multiple myeloma patients undergoing a single autologous stem-cell transplantation procedure. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:1788–1793. PMID: 19273705.
Article
26. Barlogie B, Tricot G, Anaissie E, et al. Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354:1021–1030. PMID: 16525139.
Article
27. Kagoya Y, Nannya Y, Kurokawa M. Thalidomide maintenance therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis. Leuk Res. 2012; 36:1016–1021. PMID: 22579366.
Article
Full Text Links
  • BR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr