J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2018 May;61(3):386-392. 10.3340/jkns.2018.0004.

Radiation Therapy against Pediatric Malignant Central Nervous System Tumors : Embryonal Tumors and Proton Beam Therapy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. dh8lim@skku.edu

Abstract

Radiation therapy is highly effective for the management of pediatric malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors including embryonal tumors. With the increment of long-term survivors from malignant CNS tumors, the radiation-related toxicities have become a major concern and we need to improve the treatment strategies to reduce the late complications without compromising the treatment outcomes. One of such strategies is to reduce the radiation dose to craniospinal axis or radiation volume and to avoid or defer radiation therapy until after the age of three. Another strategy is using particle beam therapy such as proton beams instead of photon beams. Proton beams have distinct physiologic advantages over photon beams and greater precision in radiation delivery to the tumor while preserving the surrounding healthy tissues. In this review, I provide the treatment principles of pediatric CNS embryonal tumors and the strategic improvements of radiation therapy to reduce treatment-related late toxicities, and finally introduce the increasing availability of proton beam therapy for pediatric CNS embryonal tumors compared with photon beam therapy.

Keyword

Child; Neoplasm; Brain; Radiation therapy; Proton beam therapy

MeSH Terms

Brain
Central Nervous System Neoplasms*
Central Nervous System*
Child
Humans
Proton Therapy
Protons
Survivors
Protons

Figure

  • Fig. 1. COG ACNS 0331 study diagram for standard-risk medulloblastoma. For children aged 3 to 7 years, CSI dose (23.5 Gy vs. 18.0 Gy) and boost radiation volume (primary site only versus entire posterior fossa) are randomized (A). For children aged 8 years or more, only boost radiation volume is randomized (B). COG : Children's Oncology Group, CSI : craniospinal irradiation, PF : posterior fossa, VCR : vincristine, CDDP : cisplatin, CCNU : lomustine, CPM : cyclophosphamide.

  • Fig. 2. Relative dose of proton and photon beams according to depth. The majority of proton’s energy is released within a few millimeters of Bragg peak (black arrow).

  • Fig. 3. Sagittal (A) and axial (B) computed tomography images showing radiation dose distributions. Red lines show the planning target volume and red color areas are regions irradiated with 100% of prescribed doses. Proton beam has no exit dose beyond Bragg peak and yellow arrows show that there is little radiation to normal organs such as heart, liver and bowels which are located at the front of the radiation target (red lines) in proton beam therapy. It can decrease the risk of second malignancies from radiation.


Reference

References

1. Armstrong GT. Long-term survivors of childhood central nervous system malignancies: the experience of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 14:298–303. 2010.
Article
2. Chi SN, Gardner SL, Levy AS, Knopp EA, Miller DC, Wisoff JH, et al. Feasibility and response to induction chemotherapy intensified with highdose methotrexate for young children with newly diagnosed high-risk disseminated medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 22:4881–4887. 2004.
Article
3. Chung CS, Yock TI, Nelson K, Xu Y, Keating NL, Tarbell NJ. Incidence of second malignancies among patients treated with proton versus photon radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 87:46–52. 2013.
Article
4. Diller L, Chow EJ, Gurney JG, Hudson MM, Kadin-Lottick NS, Kawashima TI, et al. Chronic disease in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort: a review of published findings. J Clin Oncol. 27:2339–2355. 2009.
Article
5. Fangusaro J, Finlay J, Sposto R, Ji L, Saly M, Zacharoulis S, et al. Intensive chemotherapy followed by consolidative myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue (AuHCR) in young children with newly diagnosed supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors (sPNETs): report of the Head Start I and II experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 50:312–318. 2008.
Article
6. Grill J, Renaux VK, Bulteau C, Viguier D, Levy-Piebois C, Sainte-Rose C, et al. Long-term intellectual outcome in children with posterior fossa tumors according to radiation doses and volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 45:137–145. 1999.
Article
7. Kortmann RD, Kühl J, Timmermann B, Mittler U, Urban C, Budach V, et al. Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood: results of the German prospective randomized trial HIT ‘91. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 46:269–279. 2000.
Article
8. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 114:97–109. 2007.
Article
9. Marachelian A, Butturini A, Finlay J. Myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell rescue for childhood central nervous system tumors. Bone Marrow Transplant. 41:167–172. 2008.
Article
10. Mason WP, Grovas A, Halpern S, Dunkel IJ, Garvin J, Heller G, et al. Intensive chemotherapy and bone marrow rescue for young children with newly diagnosed malignant brain tumors. J Clin Oncol. 16:210–221. 1998.
Article
11. Matthay KK, Reynolds CP, Seeger RC, Shimada H, Adkins ES, Haas-Kogan D, et al. Long-term results for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cisretinoic acid: a children’s oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 27:1007–1013. 2009.
Article
12. Merchant TE, Hua CH, Shukla H, Ying X, Nill S, Oelfke U. Proton versus photon radiotherapy for common pediatric brain tumors: comparison of models of dose characteristics and their relationship to cognitive function. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 51:110–117. 2008.
Article
13. Merchant TE, Kun LE, Krasin MJ, Wallace D, Chintagumpala MM, Woo SY, et al. Multi-institution prospective trial of reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation (23.4 Gy) followed by conformal posterior fossa (36 Gy) and primary site irradiation (55.8 Gy) and dose-intensive chemotherapy for average-risk medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 70:782–787. 2008.
Article
14. Moxon-Emre I, Bouffet E, Taylor MD, Laperriere N, Scantlebury N, Law N, et al. Impact of craniospinal dose, boost volume, and neurologic complications on intellectual outcome in patients with medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 32:1760–1768. 2014.
Article
15. Mulhern RK, Kepner JL, Thomas PR, Armstrong FD, Friedman HS, Kun LE. Neuropsychologic functioning of survivors of childhood medulloblastoma randomized to receive conventional or reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 16:1723–1728. 1998.
Article
16. Mulhern RK, Merchant TE, Gajjar A, Reddick WE, Kun LE. Late neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of brain tumours in childhood. Lancet Oncol. 5:399–408. 2004.
Article
17. Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, Kawashima T, Hudson MM, Meadows AT, et al. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med. 355:1572–1582. 2006.
Article
18. Packer RJ, Gajjar A, Vezina G, Rorke-Adams L, Burger PC, Robertson PL, et al. Phase III study of craniospinal radiation therapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed average-risk medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 24:4202–4208. 2006.
Article
19. Packer RJ, Gurney JG, Punyko JA, Donaldson SS, Inskip PD, Stovall M, et al. Long-term neurologic and neurosensory sequelae in adult survivors of a childhood brain tumor: childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 21:3255–3261. 2003.
Article
20. Packer RJ, Rood BR, MacDonald TJ. Medulloblastoma: present concepts of stratification into risk groups. Pediatr Neurosurg. 39:60–67. 2003.
Article
21. Park ES, Sung KW, Baek HJ, Park KD, Park HJ, Won SC, et al. Tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in young children with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the central nervous system. J Korean Med Sci. 27:135–140. 2012.
Article
22. Ris MD, Packer R, Goldwein J, Jones-Wallace D, Boyett JM. Intellectual outcome after reduced dose radiation therapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for medulloblastoma: a Children’s Cancer Group study. J Clin Oncol. 19:3470–3476. 2001.
Article
23. Sung KW, Lim DH, Son MH, Lee SH, Yoo KH, Koo HH, et al. Reduceddose craniospinal radiotherapy followed by tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with highrisk medulloblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 15:352–359. 2013.
Article
24. Sung KW, Lim DH, Yi ES, Choi YB, Lee JW, Yoo KH, et al. Tandem highdose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for atypical teratoid/rhabdoid Tumor. Cancer Res Treat. 48:1408–1419. 2016.
Article
25. Taylor RE, Bailey CC, Robinson KJ, Weston CL, Walker DA, Ellison D, et al. Outcome for patients with metastatic (M2-3) medulloblastoma treated with SIOP/UKCCSG PNET-3 chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 41:727–734. 2005.
Article
26. Tekautz TM, Fuller CE, Blaney S, Fouladi M, Broniscer A, Merchant TE, et al. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRT): improved survival in children 3 years of age and older with radiation therapy and high-dose alkylator-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 23:1491–1499. 2005.
Article
27. Thomas PR, Deutsch M, Kepner JL, Boyett JM, Krischer J, Aronin P, et al. Low-stage medulloblastoma: final analysis of trial comparing standarddose with reduced-dose neuraxis irradiation. J Clin Oncol. 18:3004–3011. 2000.
Article
28. Woehrer A, Slavc I, Waldhoer T, Heinzl H, Zielonke N, Czech T, et al. Incidence of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors in children: a populationbased study by the Austrian Brain Tumor Registry, 1996-2006. Cancer. 116:5725–5732. 2010.
Article
29. Wolden SL, Dunkel IJ, Souweidane MM, Happersett L, Khakoo Y, Schupak K, et al. Patterns of failure using a conformal radiation therapy tumor bed boost for medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 21:3079–3083. 2003.
Article
30. Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Finlay JL, Albright AL, Rorke LB, Milstein JM, et al. Metastasis stage, adjuvant treatment, and residual tumor are prognostic factors for medulloblastoma in children: conclusions from the Children’s Cancer Group 921 randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 17:832–845. 1999.
Article
31. Zhang R, Howell RM, Taddei PJ, Giebeler A, Mahajan A, Newhauser WD. A comparative study on the risks of radiogenic second cancers and cardiac mortality in a set of pediatric medulloblastoma patients treated with photon or proton craniospinal irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 113:84–88. 2014.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr