J Korean Acad Prosthodont.  2011 Jul;49(3):254-262.

Review of the developmental trend of implant surface modification using organic biomaterials

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea. koprosth@unitel.co.kr
  • 2Cellbiocontrol Laboratory, Department of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Institute for Dental Research, Korea University, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea.
  • 4Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Seoul Veterans Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aims to evaluate and prospect for current research trend and developmental perspectives via analyzing recent biomaterial coated-implants study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To investigate each subject respectively, several biomaterials that are using for implant surface coating were set as 'keywords'. By these keywords, major research groups in each subject were chosen, and research trend of them was analyzed. Trend of In vivo studies that examined selected biomaterials were analyzed to evaluate commercial potential.
RESULTS
The collagen research accounted for 40% of total implant study, which was the highest, and fibronectin, BMPs (bone morphogenetic proteins) and RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) peptides followed, which were ranked in descending order. Furthermore, figures of all four research subjects were also increased with time, especially a sharp increase in RGD research. According to the results of major research group, collagen that was combined with other organic and inorganic biomaterials was mostly examined, rather than using collagen only. Major research groups investigating BMPs mostly focused on rhBMP-2. In animal studies, collagen was used as resorbable membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR) or drug carrier, while BMPs were used with bone graft materials or coating material for titanium implant surface.
CONCLUSION
There is not consistency of results even in identical subjects research field. Many studies are ongoing to optimize combination between mechanical surface treatment and biomaterials such as extracellular matrix component and growth factors.

Keyword

Dental implant; Surface modification; Biomolecule; Extracellular matrix; Growth factor

MeSH Terms

Animals
Biocompatible Materials
Bone Regeneration
Collagen
Dental Implants
Drug Carriers
Extracellular Matrix
Fibronectins
Humans
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Membranes
Peptides
Research Subjects
Titanium
Transplants
Biocompatible Materials
Collagen
Dental Implants
Drug Carriers
Fibronectins
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Peptides
Titanium

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Relative % ratio of search words related with bioactive organic materials in all years.

  • Fig. 2. Relative % ratio of search words related with bioactive organic materials in recent 5 years.

  • Fig. 3. Relative % ratio of search words related with bioactive organic materials in recent 3 years.

  • Fig. 4. Comparison of the number of articles in search words related with bioactive organic materials in 5-year unit period.

  • Fig. 5. Comparison of the number of articles in search words related with bioactive organic materials in recent 5 years.

  • Fig. 6. Comparison of accumulative frequency of subject studied with collagen by Scharnweber et al.

  • Fig. 7. Changes of frequency of subject studied with collagen according to published year by Scharnweber et al.

  • Fig. 8. Comparison of accumulative frequency of subject according to use of collagen: 24 dog model studies.

  • Fig. 9. Comparison of frequency of subject according to published year: 24 dog model studies.


Reference

1.Bra�nemark PI., Adell R., Breine U., Hansson BO., Lindstro ¨m J., Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969. 3:81–100.
2.Bra�nemark PI., Hansson BO., Adell R., Breine U., Lindstro ¨m J., Halle′n O., Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977. 16:1–132.
3.Schroeder A., Pohler O., Sutter F. Tissue reaction to an implant of a titanium hollow cylinder with a titanium surface spray layer. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 1976. 86:713–27.
4.Ostman PO. Immediate/early loading of dental implants. Clinical documentation and presentation of a treatment concept. Periodontol 2000. 2008. 47:90–112.
Article
5.Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000. 15:76–94.
6.Esposito M., Murray-Curtis L., Grusovin MG., Coulthard P., Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007. 4:Art. No.: CD003815.
Article
7.Kasemo B., Gold J. Implant surfaces and interface processes. Adv Dent Res. 1999. 13:8–20.
Article
8.Chang PC., Lang NP., Giannobile WV. Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010. 21:1–12.
Article
9.Junker R., Dimakis A., Thoneick M., Jansen JA. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009. 20:185–206.
Article
10.Coelho PG., Granjeiro JM., Romanos GE., Suzuki M., Silva NR., Cardaropoli G., Thompson VP., Lemons JE. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009. 88:579–96.
Article
11.Kim TI., Jang JH., Kim HW., Knowles JC., Ku Y. Biomimetic approach to dental implants. Curr Pharm Des. 2008. 14:2201–11.
Article
12.Zhang Y., Shi B., Li C., Wang Y., Chen Y., Zhang W., Luo T., Cheng X. The synergetic bone-forming effects of combinations of growth factors expressed by adenovirus vectors on chitosan/collagen scaffolds. J Control Release. 2009. 136:172–8.
Article
13.Leknes KN., Yang J., Qahash M., Polimeni G., Susin C., Wikesjo ¨ UM. Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 (rhBMP-7/rhOP-1): radiographic observations. J Clin Periodontol. 2008. 35:914–9.
Article
14.Leknes KN., Yang J., Qahash M., Polimeni G., Susin C., Wikesjo ¨ UM. Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: radiographic observations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008. 19:1027–33.
Article
15.Baas J., Elmengaard B., Jensen TB., Jakobsen T., Andersen NT., Soballe K. The effect of pretreating morselized allograft bone with rhBMP-2 and/or pamidronate on the fixation of porous Ti and HA-coated implants. Biomaterials. 2008. 29:2915–22.
Article
16.Salata LA., Burgos PM., Rasmusson L., Novaes AB., Papalexiou V., Dahlin C., Sennerby L. Osseointegration of oxidized and turned implants in circumferential bone defects with and without adjunctive therapies: an experimental study on BMP-2 and autogenous bone graft in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007. 36:62–71.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr