J Gynecol Oncol.  2010 Dec;21(4):255-261. 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.255.

Apoptosis-related mRNA expression profiles of ovarian cancer cell lines following cisplatin treatment

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.
  • 2School of Inter-Disciplinary Bioscience and Bioengineering (I-Bio), Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, Korea. kchoi@postech.ac.kr
  • 3Division of Molecular and Life Sciences, Department of Life Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to identify apoptosis-related genes of ovarian cancer cell lines following cisplatin treatment.
METHODS
We used IC50 values and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis to compare cell death in 2 ovarian cancer cell lines, namely, SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3, upon treatment with cisplatin. Moreover, the change in transcriptional levels of apoptosis-associated genes was measured with a dendron-modified DNA microarray.
RESULTS
The protein levels for the up-regulated genes in each cell line were validated to identify the molecules that may determine the cellular behavior of cisplatin resistance. Eight genes were over-expressed in the 2 cell lines. The cisplatin-induced up-regulation of DAD1 in transcriptional and protein levels contributed to the cisplatin resistance of OVCAR-3, and the up-regulation of FASTK and TNFRSF11A in SKOV-3 resulted in its higher sensitivity to cisplatin than that of OVCAR-3.
CONCLUSION
In the present study, we have identified a set of genes responsible for apoptosis following cisplatin treatment in ovarian cancer cell lines. These genes may give information about the understanding of cisplatin-induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer.

Keyword

Ovarian cancer cell lines; Cisplatin; Apoptosis; Dendron-modified DNA microarray

MeSH Terms

Apoptosis
Cell Death
Cell Line
Cisplatin
DNA
Flow Cytometry
Inhibitory Concentration 50
Ovarian Neoplasms
RNA, Messenger
Up-Regulation
Cisplatin
DNA
RNA, Messenger

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Cisplatin-induced cell death in SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3 cells. The normalized cell survival of ovarian cells subjected to different concentrations of cisplatin (0, 10, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 nM) for 24 hr was monitored by MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)- 2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) assay.

  • Fig. 2 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of cisplatin-induced apoptotic death of SKOV-3 (A) and OVCAR-3 (B) cells. The cells in the upper right region of the 4 quadrants were counted for apoptosis after 12 hr of treatment with cisplatin. The number of dead cells is represented as a percentage in proportion to the total number of cells.

  • Fig. 3 Gene expression in SKOV-3 (A) and OVCAR-3 (B) before (0 hr) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 hr after cisplatin treatment (50 nM). The up-regulated genes are represented in red and the down-regulated genes in blue. The heat mapped regions for genes up-regulated by cisplatin treatment are enlarged, and the individual gene names are listed.

  • Fig. 4 Western blot analysis for proteins corresponding to the up-regulated genes of SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3 cells in response to cisplatin (UT: untreated, T: cisplatin treated). GAPDH was used as a loading control. Images of (A) immune-blotting and (B) protein expression quantified by ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij).


Reference

1. Helm CW, States JC. Enhancing the efficacy of cisplatin in ovarian cancer treatment - could arsenic have a role. J Ovarian Res. 2009. 2:2.
2. Giaccone G. Clinical perspectives on platinum resistance. Drugs. 2000. 59:Suppl 4. 9–17.
3. Kartalou M, Essigmann JM. Mechanisms of resistance to cisplatin. Mutat Res. 2001. 478:23–43.
4. Gately DP, Howell SB. Cellular accumulation of the anticancer agent cisplatin: a review. Br J Cancer. 1993. 67:1171–1176.
5. Lanzi C, Perego P, Supino R, Romanelli S, Pensa T, Carenini N, et al. Decreased drug accumulation and increased tolerance to DNA damage in tumor cells with a low level of cisplatin resistance. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998. 55:1247–1254.
6. Perego P, Caserini C, Gatti L, Carenini N, Romanelli S, Supino R, et al. A novel trinuclear platinum complex overcomes cisplatin resistance in an osteosarcoma cell system. Mol Pharmacol. 1999. 55:528–534.
7. Mistry P, Kelland LR, Abel G, Sidhar S, Harrap KR. The relationships between glutathione, glutathione-S-transferase and cytotoxicity of platinum drugs and melphalan in eight human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Br J Cancer. 1991. 64:215–220.
8. Eastman A, Schulte N. Enhanced DNA repair as a mechanism of resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II). Biochemistry. 1988. 27:4730–4734.
9. Chu G. Cellular responses to cisplatin. The roles of DNA-binding proteins and DNA repair. J Biol Chem. 1994. 269:787–790.
10. Anthoney DA, McIlwrath AJ, Gallagher WM, Edlin AR, Brown R. Microsatellite instability, apoptosis, and loss of p53 function in drug-resistant tumor cells. Cancer Res. 1996. 56:1374–1381.
11. Aebi S, Kurdi-Haidar B, Gordon R, Cenni B, Zheng H, Fink D, et al. Loss of DNA mismatch repair in acquired resistance to cisplatin. Cancer Res. 1996. 56:3087–3090.
12. Perego P, Righetti SC, Supino R, Delia D, Caserini C, Carenini N, et al. Role of apoptosis and apoptosis-related proteins in the cisplatin-resistant phenotype of human tumor cell lines. Apoptosis. 1997. 2:540–548.
13. el-Deiry WS. Role of oncogenes in resistance and killing by cancer therapeutic agents. Curr Opin Oncol. 1997. 9:79–87.
14. Kudoh K, Ramanna M, Ravatn R, Elkahloun AG, Bittner ML, Meltzer PS, et al. Monitoring the expression profiles of doxorubicin-induced and doxorubicin-resistant cancer cells by cDNA microarray. Cancer Res. 2000. 60:4161–4166.
15. Johnsson A, Zeelenberg I, Min Y, Hilinski J, Berry C, Howell SB, et al. Identification of genes differentially expressed in association with acquired cisplatin resistance. Br J Cancer. 2000. 83:1047–1054.
16. Johnsson A, Byrne P, de Bruin R, Weiner D, Wong J, Los G. Identification of gene clusters differentially expressed during the cellular injury responses (CIR) to cisplatin. Br J Cancer. 2001. 85:1206–1210.
17. Black MM, Speer FD. Effects of cancer chemotherapeutic agents on dehydrogenase activity of human cancer tissue in vitro. Am J Clin Pathol. 1953. 23:218–227.
18. Black MM, Speer FD. Further observations on the effects of cancer chemotherapeutic agents on the in vitro dehydrogenase activity of cancer tissue. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1954. 14:1147–1158.
19. Goldie JH, Coldman AJ. A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat Rep. 1979. 63:1727–1733.
20. Iyer L, Ratain MJ. Pharmacogenetics and cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 1998. 34:1493–1499.
21. Cloven NG, Kyshtoobayeva A, Burger RA, Yu IR, Fruehauf JP. In vitro chemoresistance and biomarker profiles are unique for histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004. 92:160–166.
22. Moch H, Schraml P, Bubendorf L, Mirlacher M, Kononen J, Gasser T, et al. High-throughput tissue microarray analysis to evaluate genes uncovered by cDNA microarray screening in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 1999. 154:981–986.
23. Wang Y, Rea T, Bian J, Gray S, Sun Y. Identification of the genes responsive to etoposide-induced apoptosis: application of DNA chip technology. FEBS Lett. 1999. 445:269–273.
24. Elek J, Park KH, Narayanan R. Microarray-based expression profiling in prostate tumors. In Vivo. 2000. 14:173–182.
25. Oh SJ, Cho SJ, Kim CO, Park JW. Characteristics of DNA microarrays fabricated on the various aminosilane layers. Langmuir. 2002. 18:1764–1769.
26. Gao JH, He ZJ, Wang Q, Li X, Li YX, Liu M, et al. Low expression of S100P associated with paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cell line. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008. 121:1563–1568.
27. Oh SJ, Ju J, Kim BC, Ko E, Hong BJ, Park JG, et al. DNA microarrays on a dendron-modified surface improve significantly the detection of single nucleotide variations in the p53 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005. 33:e90.
28. Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin DM, Peng V, Ngai J, et al. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002. 30:e15.
29. Kelleher DJ, Gilmore R. DAD1, the defender against apoptotic cell death, is a subunit of the mammalian oligosaccharyltransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997. 94:4994–4999.
30. Brewster JL, Martin SL, Toms J, Goss D, Wang K, Zachrone K, et al. Deletion of Dad1 in mice induces an apoptosis-associated embryonic death. Genesis. 2000. 26:271–278.
31. Tian Q, Taupin J, Elledge S, Robertson M, Anderson P. Fas-activated serine/threonine kinase (FAST) phosphorylates TIA-1 during Fas-mediated apoptosis. J Exp Med. 1995. 182:865–874.
32. Hughes AE, Ralston SH, Marken J, Bell C, MacPherson H, Wallace RG, et al. Mutations in TNFRSF11A, affecting the signal peptide of RANK, cause familial expansile osteolysis. Nat Genet. 2000. 24:45–48.
Full Text Links
  • JGO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr