Korean J Pain.  2021 Apr;34(2):210-216. 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.2.210.

Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia hydromorphone combined with pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a multicenter, randomized controlled study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
  • 3Department of Pain, Kunshan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
  • 4Department of Pain, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
  • 5Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • 6Department of Pain Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 7Department of Pain, Bayingolin Mongolian Autonomous Prefecture People’s Hospital, Xinjiang, China

Abstract

Background
Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common complication of acute herpes zoster. The treatment of PHN remains a challenge for clinical pain management. Despite the effectiveness of anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and lidocaine patches in reducing PHN, many patients still face intractable pain disorders. In this randomized controlled study, we evaluated whether hydromorphone through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) was effective in relieving PHN.
Methods
Patients with PHN were randomly divided into two groups, one group received oral pregabalin with IV normal saline, another group received oral pregabalin with additional IV PCA hydromorphone for two weeks. Efficacy was evaluated at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the end of the treatments.
Results
Two hundred and one patients were followed up for 12 weeks. After treatment, numerical rating scale (NRS) score of patients in the hydromorphone group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the difference of NRS scores between the two groups was statistically significant at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. The frequency of breakthrough pain in the hydromorphone group was significantly lower than that in the control group 1 and 4 weeks after treatment. After treatment, the quality of sleep in the hydromorphone group was significantly improved compared with the control group. The most common adverse reactions in the hydromorphone group were dizziness and nausea, with no significant respiratory depression.
Conclusions
IV PCA hydromorphone combined with oral pregabalin provides superior pain relief in patients with PHN, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Keyword

Analgesia; Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Opioid; Anticonvulsants; Hydromorphone; Neuralgia; Postherpetic; Opiate Alkaloids; Pain; Intractable; Pain Management; Pregabalin

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Assignment of patients to treatment groups.

  • Fig. 2 Effect of treatment on pain scores over time. The decline in the numerical rating scale (NRS) score over time in the hydromorphone group is significantly steeper than that in the control group after treatment (P < 0.001). Error bars indicate standard deviation. The asterisks indicate significant differences (***P < 0.001).

  • Fig. 3 Effect of treatment on the frequency of breakthrough pain over time. The frequency of breakthrough pain in the hydromorphone group is significantly lower than that in the control group one week and four weeks after treatment (P < 0.001). Error bars indicate standard deviation. The asterisks indicate significant differences (***P < 0.001).

  • Fig. 4 Mean pain quality scores (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, SFMPQ) over time. The mean SFMPQ score in the hydromorphone group is significantly decreased compared with the control group after treatment (P < 0.001). Error bars indicate standard deviation. The asterisks indicate significant differences (***P < 0.001). ns: no statistical difference.

  • Fig. 5 Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) in postherpetic neuralgia patients. The mean PSQI score in the hydromorphone group is significantly decreased compared with the control group after treatment (P < 0.001). Error bars indicate standard deviation. The asterisks indicate significant differences (***P < 0.001).


Reference

1. Tsai CC, Chou YY, Chen YM, Tang YJ, Ho HC, Chen DY. 2014; Effect of the herbal drug guilu erxian jiao on muscle strength, articular pain, and disability in elderly men with knee osteoarthritis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014:297458. DOI: 10.1155/2014/297458. PMID: 25309612. PMCID: PMC4182023.
Article
2. Watson CP. 2000; A new treatment for postherpetic neuralgia. N Engl J Med. 343:1563–5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200011233432110. PMID: 11087888.
Article
3. Schmader KE. 2002; Epidemiology and impact on quality of life of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Clin J Pain. 18:350–4. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200211000-00002. PMID: 12441828.
Article
4. Johnson RW, Dworkin RH. 2003; Treatment of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. BMJ. 326:748–50. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7392.748. PMID: 12676845. PMCID: PMC1125653.
Article
5. Johnson RW, Bouhassira D, Kassianos G, Leplège A, Schmader KE, Weinke T. 2010; The impact of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia on quality-of-life. BMC Med. 8:37. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-37. PMID: 20565946. PMCID: PMC2905321.
Article
6. Gnann JW Jr, Whitley RJ. 2002; Clinical practice. Herpes zoster. N Engl J Med. 347:340–6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp013211. PMID: 12151472. PMCID: PMC4789101.
7. Hansson PT, Dickenson AH. 2005; Pharmacological treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain conditions based on shared commonalities despite multiple etiologies. Pain. 113:251–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.10.007. PMID: 15661430.
Article
8. Baron R, Wasner G. 2006; Prevention and treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Lancet. 367:186–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68010-0. PMID: 16427472.
Article
9. Quigley C. 2002; Hydromorphone for acute and chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1:CD003447. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003447. PMID: 11869661.
Article
10. Sarhill N, Walsh D, Nelson KA. 2001; Hydromorphone: pharmacology and clinical applications in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 9:84–96. DOI: 10.1007/s005200000183. PMID: 11305075.
Article
11. Mahler DL, Forrest WH Jr. 1975; Relative analgesic potencies of morphine and hydromorphone in postoperative pain. Anesthesiology. 42:602–7. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197505000-00021. PMID: 48347.
Article
12. Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Backonja M, Farrar JT, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, et al. 2007; Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-based recommendations. Pain. 132:237–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.033. PMID: 17920770.
Article
13. Rauck RL, Irving GA, Wallace MS, Vanhove GF, Sweeney M. 2013; Once-daily gastroretentive gabapentin for postherpetic neuralgia: integrated efficacy, time to onset of pain relief and safety analyses of data from two phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. J Pain Symptom Manage. 46:219–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.011. PMID: 23149085.
Article
14. Melzack R. 1987; The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 30:191–7. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8. PMID: 3670870.
Article
15. Raskind MA, Peskind ER, Chow B, Harris C, Davis-Karim A, Holmes HA, et al. 2018; Trial of prazosin for post-traumatic stress disorder in military veterans. N Engl J Med. 378:507–17. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507598. PMID: 29414272.
Article
16. Chang AK, Bijur PE, Lupow JB, Gallagher EJ. 2013; Randomized clinical trial of the 2 mg hydromorphone bolus protocol versus the "1+1" hydromorphone titration protocol in treatment of acute, severe pain in the first hour of emergency department presentation. Ann Emerg Med. 62:304–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.023. PMID: 23694801.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr