J Vet Sci.  2018 Nov;19(6):798-807. 10.4142/jvs.2018.19.6.798.

Benefits of procyanidins on gut microbiota in Bama minipigs and implications in replacing antibiotics

Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. lcui@sjtu.edu.cn

Abstract

Several studies have reported the effect of absorption of procyanidins and their contribution to the small intestine. However, differences between dietary interventions of procyanidins and interventions via antibiotic feeding in pigs are rarely reported. Following 16S rRNA gene Illumina MiSeq sequencing, we observed that both procyanidin administration for 2 months (procyanidin-1 group) and continuous antibiotic feeding for 1 month followed by procyanidin for 1 month (procyanidin-2 group) increased the number of operational taxonomic units, as well as the Chao 1 and ACE indices, compared to those in pigs undergoing antibiotic administration for 2 months (antibiotic group). The genera Fibrobacter and Spirochaete were more abundant in the antibiotic group than in the procyanidin-1 and procyanidin-2 groups. Principal component analysis revealed clear separations among the three groups. Additionally, using the online Molecular Ecological Network Analyses pipeline, three co-occurrence networks were constructed; Lactobacillus was in a co-occurrence relationship with Trichococcus and Desulfovibrio and a co-exclusion relationship with Bacillus and Spharerochaeta. Furthermore, metabolic function analysis by phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states demonstrated modulation of pathways involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates, amino acids, energy, and nucleotides. These data suggest that procyanidin influences the gut microbiota and the intestinal metabolic function to produce beneficial effects on metabolic homeostasis.

Keyword

Illumina MiSeq; gastrointestinal microbiome; metabolic function; pigs; procyanidin

MeSH Terms

Absorption
Amino Acids
Anti-Bacterial Agents*
Bacillus
Carbohydrates
Desulfovibrio
Fibrobacter
Gastrointestinal Microbiome*
Genes, rRNA
Homeostasis
Intestine, Small
Lactobacillus
Metabolism
Nucleotides
Principal Component Analysis
Proanthocyanidins*
Swine
Swine, Miniature*
Amino Acids
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Carbohydrates
Nucleotides
Proanthocyanidins

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) classification levels and relative abundance of intestinal tract OTUs. The horizontal coordinate is arranged according to the sample name, and the ordinate is the number of OTUs that are classified into phylum, class, order, family, genus and species levels for each sample from the three study groups.

  • Fig. 2 Rarefaction curves (A) and rank-abundance curves (B) at 97% similarity levels. The number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) acts as a function of the number of sequence tags sampled.

  • Fig. 3 The α diversity index in the antibiotic group compared with those in the procyanidin groups. (A) Shannon index, (B) Chao1, (C) ACE, and (D) Simpson index. A, antibiotic group; P1, procyanidin-1 group; P2, procyanidin-2 group. *p < 0.05 compared with the antibiotic group.

  • Fig. 4 Relative abundance of operational taxonomic units at the phylum level. Each color indicates one phylum. For each color, the height of the column indicates the abundance of reads.

  • Fig. 5 Microbial differences in the bacterial community among groups categorized according to antibiotic and procyanidin treatment. (A) Bacterial classification between the antibiotic (A), procyanidin-1 (P1), and procyanidin-2 (P2) groups of Bama minipigs; (B) Cladogram from the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of the effect size (LEfSe) results in the three study groups.

  • Fig. 6 The principal component analysis (PCoA) analysis of the gut microbiota samples. Unweighted Unifrac separates the antibiotic (red), procyanidin-1 (blue), and procyanidin-2 (yellow) groups.

  • Fig. 7 Network of the co-occurring 90% cutoff operational taxonomic units based on correlation analysis. A connection indicates strong (Spearman's rho > 0.6) and significant (p < 0.01) correlations. The connection between nodes indicates that there is a correlation between the two species (red, positive correlation; green, negative correlation). The size of each node is proportional to the degree of connectivity.

  • Fig. 8 Prediction of bacterial metabolic function. (A) Comparison of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways predicted using phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) according to antibiotic or procyanidin treatment. (B) Venn diagram of the common functional groups. A, antibiotic group; P1, procyanidin-1 group; P2, procyanidin-2 group.


Reference

1. Appeldoorn MM, Vincken JP, Gruppen H, Hollman PC. Procyanidin dimers A1, A2, and B2 are absorbed without conjugation or methylation from the small intestine of rats. J Nutr. 2009; 139:1469–1473.
Article
2. Broadhurst MJ, Ardeshir A, Kanwar B, Mirpuri J, Gundra UM, Leung JM, Wiens KE, Vujkovic-Cvijin I, Kim CC, Yarovinsky F, Lerche NW, McCune JM, Loke P. Therapeutic helminth infection of macaques with idiopathic chronic diarrhea alters the inflammatory signature and mucosal microbiota of the colon. PLoS Pathog. 2012; 8:e1003000.
Article
3. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:335–336.
Article
4. Carmody RN, Gerber GK, Luevano JM Jr, Gatti DM, Somes L, Svenson KL, Turnbaugh PJ. Diet dominates host genotype in shaping the murine gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe. 2015; 17:72–84.
Article
5. Cho I, Yamanishi S, Cox L, Methé BA, Zavadil J, Li K, Gao Z, Mahana D, Raju K, Teitler I, Li H, Alekseyenko AV, Blaser MJ. Antibiotics in early life alter the murine colonic microbiome and adiposity. Nature. 2012; 488:621–626.
Article
6. Claesson MJ, Jeffery IB, Conde S, Power SE, O'Connor EM, Cusack S, Harris HM, Coakley M, Lakshminarayanan B, O'Sullivan O, Fitzgerald GF, Deane J, O'Connor M, Harnedy N, O'Connor K, O'Mahony D, van Sinderen D, Wallace M, Brennan L, Stanton C, Marchesi JR, Fitzgerald AP, Shanahan F, Hill C, Ross RP, O'Toole PW. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature. 2012; 488:178–184.
Article
7. Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, Knight R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell. 2012; 148:1258–1270.
Article
8. Cox A, Dixon P, Smith S. Histopathological lesions associated with equine periodontal disease. Vet J. 2012; 194:386–391.
Article
9. De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Poullet JB, Massart S, Collini S, Pieraccini G, Lionetti P. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107:14691–14696.
Article
10. Emoto T, Yamashita T, Sasaki N, Hirota Y, Hayashi T, So A, Kasahara K, Yodoi K, Matsumoto T, Mizoguchi T, Ogawa W, Hirata K. Analysis of gut microbiota in coronary artery disease patients: a possible link between gut microbiota and coronary artery disease. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016; 23:908–921.
Article
11. Faria A, Calhau C, de Freitas V, Mateus N. Procyanidins as antioxidants and tumor cell growth modulators. J Agric Food Chem. 2006; 54:2392–2397.
Article
12. Faust K, Sathirapongsasuti JF, Izard J, Segata N, Gevers D, Raes J, Huttenhower C. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012; 8:e1002606.
Article
13. Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes. 2012; 3:289–306.
Article
14. Frese SA, Parker K, Calvert CC, Mills DA. Diet shapes the gut microbiome of pigs during nursing and weaning. Microbiome. 2015; 3:28.
Article
15. Gonçalves C, Dinis T, Batista MT. Antioxidant properties of proanthocyanidins of Uncaria tomentosa bark decoction: a mechanism for anti-inflammatory activity. Phytochemistry. 2005; 66:89–98.
Article
16. Gulgun M, Erdem O, Oztas E, Kesik V, Balamtekin N, Vurucu S, Kul M, Kismet E, Koseoglu V. Proanthocyanidin prevents methotrexate-induced intestinal damage and oxidative stress. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2010; 62:109–115.
Article
17. Jerez M, Deive FJ, Sineiro J, Núñez MJ. Antioxidant activity of pine bark procyanidins in bulk corn oil and corn oil-in-water emulsions. Eur J Lipid Sci Tech. 2011; 113:1402–1411.
Article
18. Kashyap PC, Marcobal A, Ursell LK, Larauche M, Duboc H, Earle KA, Sonnenburg ED, Ferreyra JA, Higginbottom SK, Million M, Tache Y, Pasricha PJ, Knight R, Farrugia G, Sonnenburg JL. Complex interactions among diet, gastrointestinal transit, and gut microbiota in humanized mice. Gastroenterology. 2013; 144:967–977.
Article
19. Kim DS, Kim MS, Kang SW, Sung HY, Kang YH. Pine bark extract enzogenol attenuated tumor necrosis factor-α-induced endothelial cell adhesion and monocyte transmigration. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58:7088–7095.
Article
20. Kim YJ, Park HJ, Yoon SH, Kim MJ, Leem KH, Chung JH, Kim HK. Anticancer effects of oligomeric proanthocyanidins on human colorectal cancer cell line, SNU-C4. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11:4674–4678.
Article
21. Kimura Y, Sumiyoshi M. French maritime pine bark (Pinus maritima Lam.) extract (Flavangenol®) prevents chronic UVB radiation-induced skin damage and carcinogenesis in melanin-possessing hairless mice. Photochem Photobiol. 2010; 86:955–963.
Article
22. Kusuda M, Inada K, Ogawa TO, Yoshida T, Shiota S, Tsuchiya T, Hatano T. Polyphenolic constituent structures of Zanthoxylum piperitum fruit and the antibacterial effects of its polymeric procyanidin on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006; 70:1423–1431.
Article
23. Li J, Liu Y, Zhang JW, Wei H, Yang L. Characterization of hepatic drug-metabolizing activities of Bama miniature pigs (Sus scrofa domestica): comparison with human enzyme analogs. Comp Med. 2006; 56:286–290.
24. Li K, Li Q, Li J, Zhang T, Han Z, Gao D, Zheng F. Antitumor activity of the procyanidins from Pinus koraiensis Bark on mice bearing U14 cervical cancer. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2007; 127:1145–1151.
Article
25. Lin A, Bik EM, Costello EK, Dethlefsen L, Haque R, Relman DA, Singh U. Distinct distal gut microbiome diversity and composition in healthy children from Bangladesh and the United States. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e53838.
Article
26. Liu Y, Zeng BH, Shang HT, Cen YY, Wei H. Bama miniature pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) as a model for drug evaluation for humans: comparison of in vitro metabolism and in vivo pharmacokinetics of lovastatin. Comp Med. 2008; 58:580–587.
27. Mantena SK, Baliga MS, Katiyar SK. Grape seed proanthocyanidins induce apoptosis and inhibit metastasis of highly metastatic breast carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 2006; 27:1682–1691.
Article
28. Masumoto S, Terao A, Yamamoto Y, Mukai T, Miura T, Shoji T. Non-absorbable apple procyanidins prevent obesity associated with gut microbial and metabolomic changes. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:31208.
Article
29. McArdle BH, Anderson MJ. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology. 2001; 82:290–297.
Article
30. Ming DS, López A, Hillhouse BJ, French CJ, Hudson JB, Towers GH. Bioactive constituents from Iryanthera megistophylla. J Nat Prod. 2002; 65:1412–1416.
31. Newman ME. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103:8577–8582.
Article
32. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, Liang S, Zhang W, Guan Y, Shen D, Peng Y, Zhang D, Jie Z, Wu W, Qin Y, Xue W, Li J, Han L, Lu D, Wu P, Dai Y, Sun X, Li Z, Tang A, Zhong S, Li X, Chen W, Xu R, Wang M, Feng Q, Gong M, Yu J, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Hansen T, Sanchez G, Raes J, Falony G, Okuda S, Almeida M, LeChatelier E, Renault P, Pons N, Batto JM, Zhang Z, Chen H, Yang R, Zheng W, Li S, Yang H, Wang J, Ehrlich SD, Nielsen R, Pedersen O, Kristiansen K, Wang J. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2012; 490:55–60.
Article
33. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:D590–D596.
Article
34. Relman DA. Microbiology: learning about who we are. Nature. 2012; 486:194–195.
35. Rios LY, Bennett RN, Lazarus SA, Rémésy C, Scalbert A, Williamson G. Cocoa procyanidins are stable during gastric transit in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 76:1106–1110.
Article
36. Rohdewald P. A review of the French maritime pine bark extract (Pycnogenol), a herbal medication with a diverse clinical pharmacology. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002; 40:158–168.
Article
37. Scheperjans F, Aho V, Pereira PA, Koskinen K, Paulin L, Pekkonen E, Haapaniemi E, Kaakkola S, Eerola-Rautio J, Pohja M, Kinnunen E, Murros K, Auvinen P. Gut microbiota are related to Parkinson's disease and clinical phenotype. Mov Disord. 2015; 30:350–358.
Article
38. Scott KP, Gratz SW, Sheridan PO, Flint HJ, Duncan SH. The influence of diet on the gut microbiota. Pharmacol Res. 2013; 69:52–60.
Article
39. Shang HT, Niu R, Wei H, Huang ZB, Gan S, Wang A, Zeng Y. Genetic analysis of 35 microsatellite loci in three miniature pig breeds. Hereditas. 2001; 23:17–20.
40. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003; 13:2498–2504.
Article
41. Spencer JP, Schroeter H, Rechner AR, Rice-Evans C. Bioavailability of flavan-3-ols and procyanidins: gastrointestinal tract influences and their relevance to bioactive forms in vivo. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2001; 3:1023–1039.
Article
42. Tilocca B, Burbach K, Heyer CME, Hoelzle LE, Mosenthin R, Stefanski V, Camarinha-Silva A, Seifert J. Dietary changes in nutritional studies shape the structural and functional composition of the pigs' fecal microbiome–from days to weeks. Microbiome. 2017; 5:144.
Article
43. Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 2012; 489:242–249.
Article
44. Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature. 2009; 457:480–484.
Article
45. Tzounis X, Rodriguez-Mateos A, Vulevic J, Gibson GR, Kwik-Uribe C, Spencer JP. Prebiotic evaluation of cocoa-derived flavanols in healthy humans by using a randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover intervention study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011; 93:62–72.
Article
46. Visser MB, Ellen RP. New insights into the emerging role of oral spirochaetes in periodontal disease. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011; 17:502–512.
Article
47. Warton DI, Wright ST, Wang Y. Distance-based multivariate analyses confound location and dispersion effects. Method Ecol Evol. 2012; 3:89–101.
Article
48. Wu S, Li RW, Li W, Beshah E, Dawson HD, Urban JF Jr. Worm burden-dependent disruption of the porcine colon microbiota by Trichuris suis infection. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e35470.
49. Xiao Y, Li K, Xiang Y, Zhou W, Gui G, Yang H. The fecal microbiota composition of boar Duroc, Yorkshire, Landrace and Hampshire pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017; 30:1456–1463.
Article
50. Zaura E, Keijser BJ, Huse SM, Crielaard W. Defining the healthy “core microbiome” of oral microbial communities. BMC Microbiol. 2009; 9:259.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JVS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr