J Korean Diabetes.  2018 Jun;19(2):119-133. 10.4093/jkd.2018.19.2.119.

The Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Team-Based Education in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea. drsskim7@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Gimhae Bokum Hospital, Gimhae, Korea.
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Good Gang-An Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • 4Department of Nursing, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • 5Department of Nutrition, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • 6Department of Pharmacy, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • 7Department of Biostatistics, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • 8Kim Yong Ki Internal Medicine Clinic, Busan, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Although clinicians, nurse specialists, pharmacists, and nutritionists expend significant time and resources in optimizing care for patients with diabetes, the effectiveness of integrated diabetes care team approach remains unclear. We assessed the effects of a multidisciplinary team care educational intervention on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels among diabetes patients.
METHODS
We conducted a matched case-control study in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes, comparing the propensity scores pertaining to the effectiveness in reducing HbA1c levels between a group receiving an educational intervention and a control group. We included 40 pairs of patients hospitalized between June 2014 and September 2016. HbA1c values measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
The educated group showed an improvement in HbA1c levels compared to the control group at 3 months (6.3 ± 2.3% vs. 9.5 ± 4.0%; P = 0.020) and at 6 months (7.5 ± 1.5% vs. 9.6 ± 3.0%; P = 0.106). There was a significant difference in the change in mean HbA1c from baseline to 3 months between the two groups (−35.7 ± 26.1% vs. −9.1 ± 20.5%; P = 0.013).
CONCLUSION
A multidisciplinary team care education intervention was advantageous for improving glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes, and may help to optimize glycemic control in clinical practice.

Keyword

Diabetes mellitus; Glycated hemoglobin; Health education

MeSH Terms

Case-Control Studies
Diabetes Mellitus
Education*
Glucose
Health Education
Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated
Humans
Nurse Clinicians
Nutritionists
Pharmacists
Propensity Score
Specialization
Glucose

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline at 3 and 6 months. (B) Time-course of mean HbA1c between education group and control group in patients with type 2 diabetes. Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.


Reference

1. World Health Organization. Global report on diabetes. updated 2016. Available from: www.who.int/diabetes/global-report.
2. Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, Duker P, Funnell MM, Hess Fischl A, Maryniuk MD, Siminerio L, Vivian E. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38:1372–1382.
Article
3. Bartlett EE. Historical glimpses of patient education in the United States. Patient Educ Couns. 1986; 8:135–149.
Article
4. Gagliardino JJ, Aschner P, Baik SH, Chan J, Chantelot JM, Ilkova H, Ramachandran A. IDMPS investigators. Patients' education, and its impact on care outcomes, resource consumption and working conditions: data from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Diabetes Metab. 2012; 38:128–134.
Article
5. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25:1159–1171.
Article
6. Kim MY, Suh S, Jin SM, Kim SW, Bae JC, Hur KY, Kim SH, Rha MY, Cho YY, Lee MS, Lee MK, Kim KW, Kim JH. Education as prescription for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: compliance and efficacy in clinical practice. Diabetes Metab J. 2012; 36:452–459.
Article
7. Choi MJ, Yoo SH, Kim KR, Bae YM, Ahn SH, Kim SS, Min SA, Choi JS, Lee SE, Moon YJ, Rhee EJ, Park CY, Lee WY, Oh KW, Park SW, Kim SW. Effect on glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid control according to education types. Diabetes Metab J. 2011; 35:580–586.
Article
8. Healy SJ, Black D, Harris C, Lorenz A, Dungan KM. Inpatient diabetes education is associated with less frequent hospital readmission among patients with poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36:2960–2967.
Article
9. Robbins JM, Thatcher GE, Webb DA, Valdmanis VG. Nutritionist visits, diabetes classes, and hospitalization rates and charges: the Urban Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31:655–660.
Article
10. Steinsbekk A, Rygg LØ, Lisulo M, Rise MB, Fretheim A. Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:213.
Article
11. Tshiananga JK, Kocher S, Weber C, Erny-Albrecht K, Berndt K, Neeser K. The effect of nurse-led diabetes self-management education on glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Educ. 2012; 38:108–123.
Article
12. Welch G, Zagarins SE, Feinberg RG, Garb JL. Motivational interviewing delivered by diabetes educators: does it improve blood glucose control among poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011; 91:54–60.
Article
13. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (2):CD003417.
Article
14. Gary TL, Genkinger JM, Guallar E, Peyrot M, Brancati FL. Meta-analysis of randomized educational and behavioral interventions in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2003; 29:488–501.
Article
15. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000; 321:405–412.
Article
16. Brown SA. Meta-analysis of diabetes patient education research: variations in intervention effects across studies. Res Nurs Health. 1992; 15:409–419.
Article
17. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24:561–587.
Article
18. Wing RR, Goldstein MG, Acton KJ, Birch LL, Jakicic JM, Sallis JF Jr, Smith-West D, Jeffery RW, Surwit RS. Behavioral science research in diabetes: lifestyle changes related to obesity, eating behavior, and physical activity. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24:117–123.
Article
19. Wing RR. Behavioral approaches to the treatment of obesity. In : Bray GA, Bouchard C, James WPT, editors. Handbook of obesity. New York: Marcel Dekker;1998. p. 855–873.
20. Park SW, Kim DJ, Min KW, Baik SH, Choi KM, Park IB, Park JH, Son HS, Ahn CW, Oh JY, Lee J, Chung CH, Kim J, Kim H. Current status of diabetes management in Korea using National Health Insurance database. J Korean Diabetes Assoc. 2007; 31:362–367.
Article
21. Lee JR, Kim SA, Yoo JW, Kang YK. The present status of diabetes education and the role recognition as a diabetes educator of nurses in Korea. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007; 77:Suppl 1. S199–S204.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr