J Clin Neurol.  2017 Oct;13(4):387-393. 10.3988/jcn.2017.13.4.387.

Functional Connectivity of the Hippocampus in Early- and vs. Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea. khpark@gachon.ac.kr
  • 2Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea. ydson@gachon.ac.kr
  • 3Department of Family Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
  • 4Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
  • 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Health Science, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) have different clinical and neuroimaging characteristics, but memory decline is usually present in both types. However, there have been few functional studies focused on the hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease. We therefore investigated the functional connectivity between the hippocampus and other brain regions using resting-state fMRI and compared the findings between EOAD and LOAD.
METHODS
We recruited 13 patients with EOAD and 19 patients with LOAD at the early disease stage. Twenty-one young controls and ten old controls were also recruited. Each participant completed a standardized neuropsychological battery of tests and underwent T1-weighted structural MRI. fMRI data were acquired during the resting state using 3-T MRI. The functional connectivity to the hippocampus was calculated based on automated anatomical labeling templates.
RESULTS
The functional connectivity from the hippocampus to other brain regions differed between patients with EOAD and LOAD. The LOAD patients showed decreased hippocampal connectivity to cortical regions, such as to the middle temporal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, postcentral cortex, supramarginal cortex, and rolandic operculum. In contrast, EOAD patients showed smaller functional changes of the cortical regions connected to the hippocampus, such as the middle frontal cortex.
CONCLUSIONS
EOAD and LOAD patients exhibited different hippocampal connectivity. The memory decline in EOAD may be due to brain areas other than the hippocampus.

Keyword

early-onset Alzheimer's disease; late-onset Alzheimer's disease; functional connectivity; hippocampus

MeSH Terms

Alzheimer Disease*
Brain
Frontal Lobe
Hippocampus*
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Memory
Neuroimaging
Prefrontal Cortex
Temporal Lobe

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Hippocampal connectivity changes between AD and control groups (EOAD vs. YCs and LOAD vs. OCs). A: Connectivity from the left hippocampus in EOAD vs. YCs. B: Connectivity from the left hippocampus in LOAD vs. OCs. C: Connectivity from the right hippocampus in EOAD vs. YCs. D: Connectivity from the right hippocampus in LOAD vs. OCs. Red blobs indicate the regions in which hippocampal connectivity of the total AD group was significantly decreased (p<0.005) relative to that in the corresponding controls. Blue and green blobs indicate the regions in which hippocampal connectivity of the total AD group was significantly increased (p<0.005) compared to that in the corresponding controls. EOAD: early-onset Alzheimer's disease, LOAD: late-onset Alzheimer's disease, OCs: old controls, YCs: young controls.

  • Fig. 2 Comparison of hippocampal connectivity changes as calculated using the (OCs-LOAD)-(YCs-EOAD) contrast between EOAD and LOAD for each corresponding control group. A: Connectivity from the left hippocampus. B: Connectivity from the right hippocampus. Red blobs indicate the regions in which the decrease in hippocampal connectivity in the LOAD group compared to OCs was significantly larger (p<0.005) than that in EOAD compared to YCs. Blue blobs indicate the regions in which the decrease in hippocampal connectivity in the EOAD group compared to YCs was significantly larger (p<0.005) than that in LOAD compared to OCs. EOAD: early-onset Alzheimer's disease, LOAD: late-onset Alzheimer's disease, OCs: old controls, YCs: young controls.


Reference

1. Braak H, Braak E, Bohl J. Staging of Alzheimer-related cortical destruction. Eur Neurol. 1993; 33:403–408. PMID: 8307060.
Article
2. Henneman WJ, Sluimer JD, Barnes J, van der Flier WM, Sluimer IC, Fox NC, et al. Hippocampal atrophy rates in Alzheimer disease: added value over whole brain volume measures. Neurology. 2009; 72:999–1007. PMID: 19289740.
Article
3. Barnes J, Bartlett JW, van de, Loy CT, Scahill RI, Frost C, et al. A meta-analysis of hippocampal atrophy rates in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2009; 30:1711–1723. PMID: 18346820.
Article
4. Scheff SW, Price DA, Schmitt FA, Mufson EJ. Hippocampal synaptic loss in early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2006; 27:1372–1384. PMID: 16289476.
Article
5. Fellgiebel A, Yakushev I. Diffusion tensor imaging of the hippocampus in MCI and early Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011; 26(Suppl 3):257–262. PMID: 21971465.
Article
6. Hong YJ, Yoon B, Lim SC, Shim YS, Kim JY, Ahn KJ, et al. Microstructural changes in the hippocampus and posterior cingulate in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurol Sci. 2013; 34:1215–1221. PMID: 23109096.
Article
7. Rombouts S, Scheltens P. Functional connectivity in elderly controls and AD patients using resting state fMRI: a pilot study. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2005; 2:115–116. PMID: 15974906.
Article
8. Wang K, Liang M, Wang L, Tian L, Zhang X, Li K, et al. Altered functional connectivity in early Alzheimer's disease: a resting-state fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007; 28:967–978. PMID: 17133390.
Article
9. Wang L, Zang Y, He Y, Liang M, Zhang X, Tian L, et al. Changes in hippocampal connectivity in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease: evidence from resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2006; 31:496–504. PMID: 16473024.
Article
10. van der Flier WM, Pijnenburg YA, Fox NC, Scheltens P. Early-onset versus late-onset Alzheimer's disease: the case of the missing APOE ε4 allele. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10:280–288. PMID: 21185234.
Article
11. Cho H, Jeon S, Kang SJ, Lee JM, Lee JH, Kim GH, et al. Longitudinal changes of cortical thickness in early-versus late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2013; 34:1921.e9–1921.e15.
12. Ridgway GR, Lehmann M, Barnes J, Rohrer JD, Warren JD, Crutch SJ, et al. Early-onset Alzheimer disease clinical variants: multivariate analyses of cortical thickness. Neurology. 2012; 79:80–84. PMID: 22722624.
Article
13. Cho H, Seo SW, Kim JH, Kim C, Ye BS, Kim GH, et al. Changes in subcortical structures in early-versus late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2013; 34:1740–1747. PMID: 23394958.
14. Moon SW, Dinov ID, Hobel S, Zamanyan A, Choi YC, Shi R, et al. Structural brain changes in early-onset Alzheimer's disease subjects using the LONI pipeline environment. J Neuroimaging. 2015; 25:728–737. PMID: 25940587.
Article
15. Kim EJ, Cho SS, Jeong Y, Park KC, Kang SJ, Kang E, et al. Glucose metabolism in early onset versus late onset Alzheimer's disease: an SPM analysis of 120 patients. Brain. 2005; 128:1790–1801. PMID: 15888536.
Article
16. Kaiser NC, Melrose RJ, Liu C, Sultzer DL, Jimenez E, Su M, et al. Neuropsychological and neuroimaging markers in early vs. late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2012; 27:520–529. PMID: 22990206.
17. Cho H, Seo SW, Kim JH, Suh MK, Lee JH, Choe YS, et al. Amyloid deposition in early onset versus late onset Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013; 35:813–821. PMID: 23507771.
Article
18. Murray ME, Graff-Radford NR, Ross OA, Petersen RC, Duara R, Dickson DW. Neuropathologically defined subtypes of Alzheimer's disease with distinct clinical characteristics: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10:785–796. PMID: 21802369.
Article
19. Noh Y, Jeon S, Lee JM, Seo SW, Kim GH, Cho H, et al. Anatomical heterogeneity of Alzheimer disease: based on cortical thickness on MRIs. Neurology. 2014; 83:1936–1944. PMID: 25344382.
Article
20. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services task force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1984; 34:939–944. PMID: 6610841.
Article
21. Noh Y, Seo SW, Jeon S, Lee JM, Kim JH, Kim GH, et al. White matter hyperintensities are associated with amyloid burden in APOE4 non-carriers. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014; 40:877–886. PMID: 24577457.
Article
22. Ahn HJ, Chin J, Park A, Lee BH, Suh MK, Seo SW, et al. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-dementia version (SNSB-D): a useful tool for assessing and monitoring cognitive impairments in dementia patients. J Korean Med Sci. 2010; 25:1071–1076. PMID: 20592901.
Article
23. Sohn WS, Yoo K, Na DL, Jeong Y. Progressive changes in hippocampal resting-state connectivity across cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study from normal to Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2014; 28:239–246. PMID: 24614267.
24. Frisoni GB, Pievani M, Testa C, Sabattoli F, Bresciani L, Bonetti M, et al. The topography of grey matter involvement in early and late onset Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2007; 130:720–730. PMID: 17293358.
Article
25. Cavedo E, Pievani M, Boccardi M, Galluzzi S, Bocchetta M, Bonetti M, et al. Medial temporal atrophy in early and late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2014; 35:2004–2012. PMID: 24721821.
Article
26. Whitwell JL, Dickson DW, Murray ME, Weigand SD, Tosakulwong N, Senjem ML, et al. Neuroimaging correlates of pathologically defined subtypes of Alzheimer's disease: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11:868–877. PMID: 22951070.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JCN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr