Cancer Res Treat.  2016 Jul;48(3):1102-1109. 10.4143/crt.2015.207.

Variation in Practice Patterns of Korean Radiation Oncologists for Spine Metastasis between 2009 and 2014

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hee.ro.park@samsung.com
  • 2Department of Medical Device Management and Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The Korean Society of Radiation Oncologists (KOSRO) conducted the Patterns of Care Study (PCS) of radiotherapy (RT) for spine metastases in 2009. The current study was conducted to investigate current practice patterns and compare them with the results of the PCS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The survey questionnaire was composed of 10 questions regarding general information and seven questions for each of two clinical scenarios.
RESULTS
Fifty-four members of the KOSRO answered at least one question on the web-based questionnaire. The yearly number of patients treated who underwent palliative spine RT was greater than 200 in 14 (25.9%), 51 to 100 in 13 (24.1%), and 31 to 50 in 11 respondents (20.4%). Scenario 1 described a patient presenting with cord compressive spine metastasis in multiple bones and liver metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer. Thirty gray (Gy) in 10 fractions was chosen by 35 respondents (64.8%). Scenario 2 described a case of a single spine metastasis without progression after targeted therapy. Thirty Gy in 10 fractions was chosen by 19 respondents (35.2%), and a single fraction or less than four fractions of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) were selected by 18 respondents (33.3%). When compared with the 2009 PCS, practice patterns of Korean radiation oncologists had not changed significantly over 5 years, except that SABR emerged as a new treatment modality in the selected population.
CONCLUSION
The 2014 PCS demonstrated that multiple fraction RT is still preferred in a considerable proportion of Korean radiation oncologists.

Keyword

Data collection; Spine; Neoplasm metastasis; Radiotherapy; Physician's practice patterns; Korea

MeSH Terms

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Data Collection
Humans
Korea
Liver
Neoplasm Metastasis*
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Radiotherapy
Spine*
Surveys and Questionnaires

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Practice pattern changes from 2009 to 2014 in similar scenarios with a short life expectancy. Preference for radiotherapy fractionation in a case with a Karnofsky performance status of 70 and T6-10 level spine metastases with multiple liver metastases in the current study (A). A similar case in the 2009 study with a similar performance status with L3 spine metastases and multiple liver and abdominal lymph nodes metastases (B) is presented. Many Korean radiation oncologists responded that they preferred the multiple fractionation regimen; these results were similar between the 2009 and 2014 studies.

  • Fig. 2. Practice pattern changes from 2009 to 2014 in similar scenarios with favorable life expectancy. Preference for radiotherapy fractionation in the case with a Karnofsky performance status of 90 and solitary T9 level spine metastasis of renal cell carcinoma with stable disease of both lung and adrenal metastases after target therapy in the current study (A). A similar case of breast cancer with T6-7 spine only metastasis that had excellent performance status from the 2009 study (B) is displayed. Hypofractionation representing stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy was significantly increased compared with the results of the 2009 study, but the multiple fractionation scheme still accounted for a large proportion of answers.


Cited by  2 articles

The Feasibility of Spinal Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spinal Metastasis with Epidural Cord Compression
Yi-Jun Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Kyubo Kim, Hak Jae Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, Kyung Hwan Shin, Hong-Gyun Wu, Il Han Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1324-1335.    doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.653.

The Effect of Perioperative Radiation Therapy on Spinal Bone Fusion Following Spine Tumor Surgery
Tae-Kyum Kim, Wonik Cho, Sang Min Youn, Ung-Kyu Chang
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016;59(6):597-603.    doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.6.597.


Reference

References

1. Chow E, Zeng L, Salvo N, Dennis K, Tsao M, Lutz S. Update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012; 24:112–24.
Article
2. Crnalic S, Lofvenberg R, Bergh A, Widmark A, Hildingsson C. Predicting survival for surgery of metastatic spinal cord compression in prostate cancer: a new score. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37:2168–76.
3. Douglas S, Schild SE, Rades D. Metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with cancer of unknown primary. Estimating the survival prognosis with a validated score. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012; 188:1048–51.
4. Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Wakai K, Sugiura H, Kataoka T, Nakanishi K. Prognostic factors and a scoring system for patients with skeletal metastasis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87:698–703.
Article
5. Rades D, Douglas S, Veninga T, Stalpers LJ, Bajrovic A, Rudat V, et al. Prognostic factors in a series of 504 breast cancer patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012; 188:340–5.
Article
6. Tokuhashi Y, Uei H, Oshima M, Ajiro Y. Scoring system for prediction of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. World J Orthop. 2014; 5:262–71.
Article
7. Fairchild A, Barnes E, Ghosh S, Ben-Josef E, Roos D, Hartsell W, et al. International patterns of practice in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: evidence-based practice? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75:1501–10.
Article
8. Nakamura N, Shikama N, Wada H, Harada H, Nozaki M, Nagakura H, et al. Patterns of practice in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: a survey in Japan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 83:e117–20.
Article
9. Popovic M, den Hartogh M, Zhang L, Poon M, Lam H, Bedard G, et al. Review of international patterns of practice for the treatment of painful bone metastases with palliative radiotherapy from 1993 to 2013. Radiother Oncol. 2014; 111:11–7.
Article
10. Wu JS, Kerba M, Wong RK, McKimmon E, Eigl B, Hagen NA. Patterns of practice in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: impact of a regional rapid access clinic on access to care. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78:533–8.
Article
11. DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61:409–18.
Article
12. Korean Breast Cancer Society. Breast Cancer White Paper 2014. Seoul: Korean Breast Cancer Society;2014.
13. Bydon M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Bettagowda C, Gokaslan ZL, Sciubba DM. The use of stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of spinal axis tumors: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014; 125:166–72.
Article
14. Chow E, Harris K, Fan G, Tsao M, Sze WM. Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25:1423–36.
Article
15. Olson RA, Tiwana MS, Barnes M, Kiraly A, Beecham K, Miller S, et al. Use of single- versus multiple-fraction palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: population-based analysis of 16,898 courses in a Canadian province. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 89:1092–9.
Article
16. Chung Y, Koom WS, Ahn YC, Park HC, Kim HJ, Yoon SM, et al. A survey of patterns of practice on palliative radiation therapy for bone metastasis in Korea. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013; 139:2089–96.
Article
17. Dy SM, Asch SM, Naeim A, Sanati H, Walling A, Lorenz KA. Evidence-based standards for cancer pain management. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26:3879–85.
Article
18. van den Hout WB, van der Linden YM, Steenland E, Wiggenraad RG, Kievit J, de Haes H, et al. Single- versus multiple-fraction radiotherapy in patients with painful bone metastases: cost-utility analysis based on a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95:222–9.
Article
19. Leithner A, Radl R, Gruber G, Hochegger M, Leithner K, Welkerling H, et al. Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17:1488–95.
Article
20. Wibmer C, Leithner A, Hofmann G, Clar H, Kapitan M, Berghold A, et al. Survival analysis of 254 patients after manifestation of spinal metastases: evaluation of seven preoperative scoring systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36:1977–86.
21. Zadnik PL, Hwang L, Ju DG, Groves ML, Sui J, Yurter A, et al. Prolonged survival following aggressive treatment for metastatic breast cancer in the spine. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2014; 31:47–55.
Article
22. Chang EL, Shiu AS, Mendel E, Mathews LA, Mahajan A, Allen PK, et al. Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis and its pattern of failure. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 7:151–60.
Article
23. Gerszten PC, Burton SA, Ozhasoglu C, Welch WC. Radiosurgery for spinal metastases: clinical experience in 500 cases from a single institution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32:193–9.
24. Lee S, Chun M, Lee M. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for solitary spine metastasis. Radiat Oncol J. 2013; 31:260–6.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr