Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr.  2012 Jun;15(2):85-90.

Comparison of Four Commercial ELISA Kits and In-House Immunoblotting for Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Institute of Health Science, Jinju, Korea. hsyoun@gnu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Institute of Health Science, Jinju, Korea.
  • 3Department of Microbiology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Institute of Health Science, Jinju, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits have been considered less reliable for children than for adults. The aim of this study was to compare four ELISA kits and in-house immunoblotting based on the analysis of anti-H. pylori-IgG antibody reactivity.
METHODS
A total of 399 serum samples were collected at the GNU Hospital during 1998-1999. All sera were tested using ELISA and immunoblotting. Statistically significant differences were determined by the chi2 test.
RESULTS
The overall seropositivity rates using GAP IgG, Genedia IgG, HM-CAP, Pyloriset EIA-G, and immunoblotting were 13.0%, 25.1%, 18.3%, 15.8%, and 62.9%, respectively. Immunoblotting showed a higher seropositivity rate than did all four ELISA kits in all age groups. Genedia IgG had the highest seropositivity among the ELISA kits. The seropositivity rate for children aged 13 to 18 months was lowest, and that of children aged 15 years was highest (90.0%). The seropositivity rate for children aged 7 months to 5 years was significantly lower than that for children aged 6 to 15 years among the four ELISA kits (p<0.0001) and immunoblotting (p=0.02).
CONCLUSION
Immunoblotting is the most sensitive test for detection of anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibodies among the serological tests in this study. These results emphasize the need for standardization when commercial ELISA tests are used in different nations or in young age groups. Immunoblotting could be a suitable noninvasive assay for serodiagnosis and seroepidemiologic study of H. pylori infection in Korean children.

Keyword

ELISA; Immunoblot; Helicobacter pylori infection; Children

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Antibodies
Child
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Helicobacter
Helicobacter pylori
Humans
Immunoblotting
Immunoglobulin G
Seroepidemiologic Studies
Serologic Tests
Antibodies
Immunoglobulin G

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Immunoblot assay results were classified into three patterns based on immunoreactive bands. Only Pattern I, which shows reactivities against 120-kDa antigens as well as other antigens of H. pylori, was considered to be a specific marker of H. pylori infection in this study. Panel A shows a Ponceau S-stained nitrocellulose membrane onto which marker proteins and separated H. pylori antigen were transferred.

  • Fig. 2 Seropositivity rates of the four commercial ELISA kits and immunoblotting according to age. The seropositivity rates increased with age. The seropositivity rates of immunoblotting were higher than those of the ELISA kits, and the discrepancy in the seropositivity rates of anti-H. pylori IgG antibody was highest in 0- to 6-month-old infants.

  • Fig. 3 Comparisons of seropositivity rates for GAP IgG, Genedia IgG, HM-CAP, Pyloriset EIA-G, and immunoblotting in children 7 months to 5 years of age and 6 to 15 years of age. The seropositivity rates in children aged 6 years and older were higher than those of children aged 7 months to 5 years of age in all ELISA kits and immunoblotting. *p<0.0001, **p=0.02.

  • Fig. 4 Proportion of immunoblot patterns in the seropositive cases of the four ELISA kits. More than 80% were Pattern I. There were no results showing Pattern III.


Reference

1. Brown KE, Peura DA. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1993. 22:105–115.
2. Carpenter HA, Talley NJ. Gastroscopy is incomplete without biopsy: clinical relevance of distinguishing gastropathy from gastritis. Gastroenterology. 1995. 108:917–924.
Article
3. Cutler AF, Havstead S, Ma CK, Blaser MJ, Perez-Perez GI, Schubert TT. Accuracy of invasive and non-invasive test to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterology. 1995. 109:136–141.
Article
4. Leung Wk, Chan FKL, Falk MS, Suen R, Sung JJY. Comparison of two rapid whole-blood tests for Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1998. 36:3441–3442.
Article
5. Khanna B, Cutler A, Israel NR, Perry M, Lastovica A, Fields PI, et al. Use caution with serologic testing for Helicobacter pylori infection in children. J Infect Dis. 1998. 178:460–465.
Article
6. Raymond J, Sauvestre C, Kalach N, Bergeret M, Dupont C. Immunoblotting and serology for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000. 19:118–121.
Article
7. Drumm B, Koletzko S, Oderda G. Helicobacter pylori infection in children: a consensus statement. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000. 30:207–213.
8. Kindermann A, Konstantopoulos N, Lehn N, Demmelmair H, Koletzko S. Evaluation of two commercial enzyme immunoassays, testing immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA responses, for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. 39:3591–3596.
Article
9. Raymond J, Sauvestre C, Kalach N, Bergeret M, Dupont C. Immunoblotting and serology for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000. 19:118–121.
Article
10. Youn HS, Baik SC, Lee WK, Cho MJ, Ryou HH, Choi HJ, et al. Serodiagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Bacteriol Virol. 1990. 25:463–474.
11. Best LM, Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ, Sherman PM, Berganson GS. Serological detection of Helicobacter pylori antibodies in children and their parents. J Clin Microbiol. 1994. 32:1193–1196.
Article
12. Leung WK, Ng EK, Chan FK, Chung SC, Sung JJ. Evaluation of three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori in Chinese patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999. 34:13–17.
Article
13. Lee KL, Lim CY, Lee DH, Yoon JH, Lee HJ, Chung HC, et al. Evaluation of CtuickVue H. pylori test and IgG ELISA test in Helicobacter pylori infection. Korean J Gastroenterol. 1997. 29:35–40.
14. Hong SP, Park HJ, Park IS, Lee KW, Kim HG. Serological diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: comparison of diagnostic values between HM-CAP (EPI) test and GAP (Bio-Rad) test. Korean J Gastroenterol. 1995. 27:167–173.
15. Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim NY, Kim SW, Kim JG, Kim JJ, et al. Seroepidemiological study of Helicobacter pylori infection in asymptomatic people in South Korea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001. 16:969–975.
Article
16. Jung IS, Kim SW, Ko JS, Kim NY, Kim JG, Kim JH, et al. Accuracy of Genedia™ H. pylori ELISA for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in Korean population. Korean J Med. 2001. 61:17–23.
17. Andersen LP, Wewer AV, Christiansen KM, Tvede M, Hansen JP, Henriksen FW, et al. The humoral immune response to Helicobacter pylori infection in children with recurrent abdominal pain. APMIS. 1994. 102:457–464.
Article
18. Yamaoka Y, Kodama T, Gutierrez O, Kim JG, Kashima K, Graham DY. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori iceA, cagA, and vacA status and clinical outcome: studies in four different countries. J Clin Microbiol. 1999. 37:2274–2279.
Article
19. Yamaoka Y, Kodama T, Graham DY, Kashima K. Comparison of four serological tests to determine the CagA or VacA status of Helicobacter pylori strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1998. 36:3433–3434.
Article
20. Ko JS, Kim KM, Oh YL, Seo JK. cagA, vacA, and iceA genotypes of Helicobacter pylori in Korean children. Pediatr Int. 2008. 50:628–631.
21. Hsu PI, Lai KH, Tseng HH, Liu YU, Yen MY, Lin CK, et al. Correlation of serum immunoglobulin G Helicobacter pylori antibody levels with histologic and endoscopic findings in patients with dyspepsia. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997. 25:587–591.
Article
22. Chen TS, Li FY, Chang FY, Lee SD. Immunoglobulin G antibody against Helicobacter pylori: clinical implications of levels found in serum. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002. 9:1044–1048.
Article
Full Text Links
  • PGHN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr