J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg.  1998 Nov;20(4):291-295.

A clinical study about comparison of inhalation anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia with oral and maxillofacial patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery, Masan Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkawan Univ. College of medicine.
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology, Masan Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkawan Univ. College of medicine.
  • 3Department of Dentistry, Masan Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkawan Univ. College of medicine.

Abstract

Intravenous anesthesia was compared with inhalation anesthesia in 20 patients of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to study in two treatment groups. 20 patients were injected ketamine and propofol. 20 patients were administered Enflurane. The respond of patients consciousness and general recovery condition of the two groups were compared. Intravenous anesthesia group were awake significantly faster without complications such as nause, vomiting, and agitation after operation than inhalation anesthesia group. Full recovery time of intravenous anesthesia group was significantly 3 times less than inhalation anesthesia group. The authors conclude that intravenous anesthesia is a practical technique for oral and maxillofacial surgery patients undergoing and may be preferable to intravenous anesthesia because of the significantly short of recovery time without complications.

Keyword

Ketamine; Propofol; Enflurane; Intravenous anesthesia; Inhalation anesthesia

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia, Inhalation*
Anesthesia, Intravenous*
Consciousness
Dihydroergotamine
Enflurane
Humans
Inhalation*
Ketamine
Propofol
Surgery, Oral
Vomiting
Dihydroergotamine
Enflurane
Ketamine
Propofol
Full Text Links
  • JKAMPRS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr