J Breast Cancer.  2016 Mar;19(1):18-25. 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.1.18.

Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Increases Radiosensitivity of Estrogen Receptor-Positive and -Negative Breast Cancer Cells by Prolonging Radiation-Induced DNA Damage

Affiliations
  • 1Laboratory of Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Iran.
  • 2Department of Radiotherapy, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
  • 3Laboratory of Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. goliaei@ibb.ut.ac.ir

Abstract

PURPOSE
Breast cancer is an important cause of death among women. The development of radioresistance in breast cancer leads to recurrence after radiotherapy. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), a polyphenolic compound of honeybee propolis, is known to have anticancer properties. In this study, we examined whether CAPE enhanced the radiation sensitivity of MDA-MB-231 (estrogen receptor-negative) and T47D (estrogen receptor-positive) cell lines.
METHODS
The cytotoxic effect of CAPE on MDA-MB-231 and T47D breast cancer cells was evaluated by performing an 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. To assess clonogenic ability, MDA-MB-231 and T47D cells were treated with CAPE (1 µM) for 72 hours before irradiation, and then, a colony assay was performed. A comet assay was used to determine the number of DNA strand breaks at four different times.
RESULTS
CAPE decreased the viability of both cell lines in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In the clonogenic assay, pretreatment of cells with CAPE before irradiation significantly reduced the surviving fraction of MDA-MB-231 cells at doses of 6 and 8 Gy. A reduction in the surviving fraction of T47D cells was observed relative to MDA-MB-231 at lower doses of radiation. Additionally, CAPE maintained radiation-induced DNA damage in T47D cells for a longer period than in MDA-MB-231 cells.
CONCLUSION
Our results indicate that CAPE impairs DNA damage repair immediately after irradiation. The induction of radiosensitivity by CAPE in radioresistant breast cancer cells may be caused by prolonged DNA damage.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Caffeic acid phenethyl ester; DNA damage; Radiation-sensitizing agents

MeSH Terms

Breast Neoplasms*
Breast*
Cause of Death
Cell Line
Comet Assay
DNA Damage*
DNA*
Estrogens*
Female
Humans
Propolis
Radiation Tolerance*
Radiation-Sensitizing Agents
Radiotherapy
Recurrence
DNA
Estrogens
Propolis
Radiation-Sensitizing Agents

Figure

  • Figure 1 Effect of CAPE on the viability of breast cancer cell lines. The cells were treated with 1–100 µM CAPE for 24, 48, and 72 hours and cell viability was evaluated using the MTT assay. (A) MDA-MB-231 cells. (B) T47D cells. CAPE reduced the cell viability in time- and dose-dependent manners. The data represent the mean±SD of three independent experiments. DMSO=dimethyl sulfoxide; CAPE=caffeic acid phenethyl ester; MTT=3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide.

  • Figure 2 Clonogenic ability of MDA-MB-231 and T47D cells in the presence of different concentrations of CAPE. The cells were treated with 1, 5, and 10 µM CAPE for 72 hours, replated, and incubated for the indicated number of days to form colonies. (A) MDA-MB-231 cells. (B) T47D cells. (C) Representative colony formation assay of MDA-MB-231 (up) and T47D (down) cells at different concentrations of CAPE. (D) Images of single colonies of MDA-MB-231 (up) and T47D (down) cells after crystal violet staining, acquired using an inverted microscope (×5). Data represent the mean±standard deviation of two independent experiments. DMSO=dimethyl sulfoxide; CAPE=caffeic acid phenethyl ester. *p<0.05; †p<0.001.

  • Figure 3 CAPE effects on breast cancer cell line radiosensitivity. (A) Survival curve of MDA-MB-231. (B) Survival curve of T47D cells. A colony-forming assay was performed using control cells and cells treated with 1 µM CAPE for 72 hours after exposure to radiation (2, 4, 6, and 8 Gy). The surviving fraction of group treated with CAPE plus radiation was compared to that of the irradiated group. IR=irradiation; CAPE=caffeic acid phenethyl ester. *p<0.05; †p<0.001 represent statistical significance.

  • Figure 4 Level of radiation induced breaks in the presence of CAPE. MDA-MB-231 and T47D cells were treated with 1 µM CAPE for 72 hours and then exposed to radiation (6 Gy); the amount of DNA damage was determined by the comet assay immediately after irradiation until 2 hours. (A) %DNA in tail in MDA-MB-231. (B) %DNA in tail in T47D. (C) Olive tail moment in MDA-MB-231. (D) Olive tail moment in T47D. The mean±SD value of each parameter was measured from two independent experiments. CAPE=caffeic acid phenethyl ester; IR=irradiation. *p<0.05.

  • Figure 5 Representative comet assay images of MDA-MB-231 and T47D cells show changes in DNA damage levels. CAPE pretreated with 1 µM CAPE for 72 hours and then irradiated. The amount of DNA damage was analyzed immediately after radiation exposure (6 Gy) up to 2 hours. (A) MDA-MB-231 cells. (B) T47D cells. Four different groups of cells were compared at different time points (control, CAPE treated, irradiated, and combination of radiation and CAPE) at 0, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after irradiation. Images of cells were acquired using a fluorescence microscope (×20) followed by staining with ethidium bromide. CAPE=caffeic acid phenethyl ester; IR=irradiation.


Reference

1. Weigelt B, Peterse JL, van't Veer LJ. Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5:591–602.
Article
2. Hagen KR, Zeng X, Lee MY, Tucker Kahn S, Harrison Pitner MK, Zaky SS, et al. Silencing CDK4 radiosensitizes breast cancer cells by promoting apoptosis. Cell Div. 2013; 8:10.
Article
3. Garg AK, Buchholz TA, Aggarwal BB. Chemosensitization and radiosensitization of tumors by plant polyphenols. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005; 7:1630–1647.
Article
4. Jameel JK, Rao VS, Cawkwell L, Drew PJ. Radioresistance in carcinoma of the breast. Breast. 2004; 13:452–460.
Article
5. Nambiar D, Rajamani P, Singh RP. Effects of phytochemicals on ionization radiation-mediated carcinogenesis and cancer therapy. Mutat Res. 2011; 728:139–157.
Article
6. Kang NJ, Shin SH, Lee HJ, Lee KW. Polyphenols as small molecular inhibitors of signaling cascades in carcinogenesis. Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 130:310–324.
Article
7. Watanabe MA, Amarante MK, Conti BJ, Sforcin JM. Cytotoxic constituents of propolis inducing anticancer effects: a review. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 63:1378–1386.
Article
8. Chen MF, Wu CT, Chen YJ, Keng PC, Chen WC. Cell killing and radiosensitization by caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) in lung cancer cells. J Radiat Res. 2004; 45:253–260.
Article
9. Ozturk G, Ginis Z, Akyol S, Erden G, Gurel A, Akyol O. The anticancer mechanism of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE): review of melanomas, lung and prostate cancers. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012; 16:2064–2068.
10. Akyol S, Ozturk G, Ginis Z, Armutcu F, Yigitoglu MR, Akyol O. In vivo and in vitro antıneoplastic actions of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE): therapeutic perspectives. Nutr Cancer. 2013; 65:515–526.
Article
11. Natarajan K, Singh S, Burke TR Jr, Grunberger D, Aggarwal BB. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester is a potent and specific inhibitor of activation of nuclear transcription factor NF-kappa B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93:9090–9095.
Article
12. Li F, Sethi G. Targeting transcription factor NF-kappaB to overcome chemoresistance and radioresistance in cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010; 1805:167–180.
Article
13. Ding J, Miao ZH, Meng LH, Geng MY. Emerging cancer therapeutic opportunities target DNA-repair systems. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2006; 27:338–344.
Article
14. Tanaka T, Munshi A, Brooks C, Liu J, Hobbs ML, Meyn RE. Gefitinib radiosensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells by suppressing cellular DNA repair capacity. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14:1266–1273.
Article
15. Franken NA, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2006; 1:2315–2319.
Article
16. Rouhani M, Goliaei B, Khodagholi F, Nikoofar A. Lithium increases radiosensitivity by abrogating DNA repair in breast cancer spheroid culture. Arch Iran Med. 2014; 17:352–360.
17. Simeone AM, Broemeling LD, Rosenblum J, Tari AM. HER2/neu reduces the apoptotic effects of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR) in breast cancer cells by decreasing nitric oxide production. Oncogene. 2003; 22:6739–6747.
Article
18. Chavez KJ, Garimella SV, Lipkowitz S. Triple negative breast cancer cell lines: one tool in the search for better treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Breast Dis. 2010; 32:35–48.
Article
19. Deorukhkar A, Krishnan S. Targeting inflammatory pathways for tumor radiosensitization. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010; 80:1904–1914.
Article
20. Chen YJ, Liao HF, Tsai TH, Wang SY, Shiao MS. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester preferentially sensitizes CT26 colorectal adenocarcinoma to ionizing radiation without affecting bone marrow radioresponse. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 63:1252–1261.
Article
21. Lin YH, Chiu JH, Tseng WS, Wong TT, Chiou SH, Yen SH. Antiproliferation and radiosensitization of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on human medulloblastoma cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006; 57:525–532.
Article
22. Lee YY, Kao CL, Tsai PH, Tsai TH, Chiou SH, Wu WF, et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester preferentially enhanced radiosensitizing and increased oxidative stress in medulloblastoma cell line. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008; 24:987–994.
Article
23. Omene C, Kalac M, Wu J, Marchi E, Frenkel K, O'Connor OA. Propolis and its active component, caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), modulate breast cancer therapeutic targets via an epigenetically mediated mechanism of action. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2013; 5:334–342.
Article
24. Thomas C, Rajapaksa G, Nikolos F, Hao R, Katchy A, McCollum CW, et al. ERbeta1 represses basal breast cancer epithelial to mesenchymal transition by destabilizing EGFR. Breast Cancer Res. 2012; 14:R148.
25. Holliday DL, Speirs V. Choosing the right cell line for breast cancer research. Breast Cancer Res. 2011; 13:215.
Article
26. Jung BI, Kim MS, Kim HA, Kim D, Yang J, Her S, et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester, a component of beehive propolis, is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator. Phytother Res. 2010; 24:295–300.
Article
27. Lin HP, Jiang SS, Chuu CP. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester causes p21 induction, Akt signaling reduction, and growth inhibition in PC-3 human prostate cancer cells. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e31286.
28. Wu J, Omene C, Karkoszka J, Bosland M, Eckard J, Klein CB, et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), derived from a honeybee product propolis, exhibits a diversity of anti-tumor effects in pre-clinical models of human breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2011; 308:43–53.
Article
29. Zoberi I, Bradbury CM, Curry HA, Bisht KS, Goswami PC, Roti Roti JL, et al. Radiosensitizing and anti-proliferative effects of resveratrol in two human cervical tumor cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2002; 175:165–173.
Article
30. Lee Y, Shin DH, Kim JH, Hong S, Choi D, Kim YJ, et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester-mediated Nrf2 activation and IkappaB kinase inhibition are involved in NFkappaB inhibitory effect: structural analysis for NFkappaB inhibition. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010; 643:21–28.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr