Korean Circ J.  2011 Sep;41(9):497-502. 10.4070/kcj.2011.41.9.497.

Molecular Imaging of High-Risk Atherosclerotic Plaques: Is It Clinically Translatable?

Affiliations
  • 1Cardiovascular Center and Cardiology Division, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea. kiyuk@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

The explosive epidemics of diabetes and obesity as well as an aging population have led to cardiovascular diseases as the leading cause of world-wide morbidity and mortality beyond cancer. The recent introduction of drug-eluting stents and medications such as statins, dual anti-platelet therapy, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors has dramatically improved clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, mortality is still increasing despite state-of-the-art therapeutics, as current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies against cardiovascular disease center on "locking the barn door after the horse has been stolen". Novel diagnostic solutions that identify individuals at risk before the disease is overt are needs. Imaging approaches that visualize molecular targets rather than anatomical structures aim to illuminate vital molecular and cellular aspects of atherosclerosis biology in vivo. Recent technological advances in small animal imaging systems and dedicated targeted/activatable molecular imaging probes have positioned molecular imaging to greatly impact atherosclerosis imaging in the next decade. However, several issues must be addressed before its clinical translation.

Keyword

Molecular imaging; Atherosclerosis; Primary prevention

MeSH Terms

Aging
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Animals
Atherosclerosis
Biology
Cardiovascular Diseases
Drug-Eluting Stents
Horses
Humans
Molecular Imaging
Obesity
Primary Prevention
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Development of an atherosclerotic lesion and specific imaging targets at different stage of atherogenesis. The main cellular or molecular processes involved in each stage of atherosclerosis are presented. Potential molecular imaging targets at different stages are also listed.8)

  • Fig. 2 Upper right panel (B) shows a dark signal in the wall of an apoE-/- mouse aorta after an injection of silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles compared with a precontrast MRI (A). Confocal microscopy shows accumulation of iron oxide nanoparticles in the aorta of a 30-week-old apoE-/- mouse. Most nanoparticles are noted in the macrophage-rich plaque area (C and D).

  • Fig. 3 Effect of simvastatin on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake into atherosclerotic plaques. Diet alone does not have an effect on FDG uptake into carotid arteries. In contrast, simvastatin significantly attenuated FDG uptake into carotid arteries.9)

  • Fig. 4 High-resolution in vivo fluorescence molecular imaging of intraplaque neoangiogenesis and apoptosis in carotid atheroma of apoE-/- mice. After injecting angiogenesis- and apoptosis-targeting molecular imaging agents, intravital two-photon microscopy of carotid atheromata in a 34 week-old apoE-/- mouse revealed discrete plaque-specific neoangiogenesis (middle) and apoptosis (right).

  • Fig. 5 Discrepancy between structure and inflammation during imaging. Both patients had a similar degree of stenotic plaques in their carotid arteries, but different positron emission tomography (PET) signals suggestive of greater inflammation in one patient (left column) and lower macrophage infiltration (lower panel) in the other patient (right column).


Cited by  1 articles

Effect of Pioglitazone in Combination with Moderate Dose Statin on Atherosclerotic Inflammation: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Using Serial FDG-PET/CT
Eun Ho Choo, Eun-Ji Han, Chan Joon Kim, Sung-Hoon Kim, Joo-Hyun O, Kiyuk Chang, Ki-Bae Seung
Korean Circ J. 2018;48(7):591-601.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0029.


Reference

1. Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr, et al. 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. 54:2205–2241.
2. Mehta SR, Cannon CP, Fox KA, et al. Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2005. 293:2908–2917.
3. Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomized trial: randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina. Lancet. 2002. 360:743–751.
4. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007. 356:1503–1516.
5. Wang JC, Normand SL, Mauri L, Kuntz RE. Coronary artery spatial distribution of acute myocardial infarction occlusions. Circulation. 2004. 110:278–284.
6. Sinusas AJ, Bengel F, Nahrendorf M, et al. Multimodality cardiovascular molecular imaging, part I. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008. 1:244–256.
7. Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik DE, French BA, et al. Multimodality cardiovascular molecular imaging, part II. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009. 2:56–70.
8. Sanz J, Fayad ZA. Imaging of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2008. 451:953–957.
9. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: from pathophysiology to practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. 54:2129–2138.
10. Jaffer FA, Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik D, Kelly KA, Aikawa E, Weissleder R. Cellular imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis using magnetofluorescent nanomaterials. Mol Imaging. 2006. 5:85–92.
11. Trivedi RA, Mallawarachi C, U-King-Im JM, et al. Identifying inflamed carotid plaques using in vivo USPIO-enhanced MR imaging to label plaque macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006. 26:1601–1606.
12. Lee K, Moon HY, Park C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of macrophage activity in atherosclerotic plaques of apolipoprotein E-deficient mice by using polyethylene glycolated magnetic fluorescent silica-coated nanoparticles. Curr Appl Phys. 2009. 9:S15–S18.
13. Rudd JH, Warburton EA, Fryer TD, et al. Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2002. 105:2708–2711.
14. Tahara N, Kai H, Ishibashi M, et al. Simvastatin attenuates plaque inflammation: evaluation by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. 48:1825–1831.
15. Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010. 30:1282–1292.
16. Falk E. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. 47:8 Suppl. C7–C12.
17. Dollery CM, Libby P. Atherosclerosis and proteinase activation. Cardiovasc Res. 2006. 69:625–635.
18. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation. 2003. 108:1664–1672.
19. Chang K, Jaffer F. Advances in fluorescence imaging of the cardiovascular system. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008. 15:417–428.
20. Jaffer FA, Vinegoni C, John MC, et al. Real-time catheter molecular sensing of inflammation in proteolytically active atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2008. 118:1802–1809.
21. Jaffer FA, Calfon MA, Rosenthal A, et al. Two-dimensional intravascular near-infrared fluorescence molecular imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis and stent-induced vascular injury. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011. 57:2516–2526.
22. Tabas I. Macrophage death and defective inflammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010. 10:36–46.
23. Tabas I. The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the progression of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2010. 107:839–850.
24. Moore KJ, Tabas I. Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2011. 145:341–355.
25. Kietselaer BL, Reutelingsperger CP, Heidendal GA, et al. Noninvasive detection of plaque instability with use of radiolabeled annexin A5 in patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2004. 350:1472–1473.
26. Jeziorska M, Woolley DE. Neovascularization in early atherosclerotic lesions of human carotid arteries: its potential contribution to plaque development. Hum Pathol. 1999. 30:919–925.
27. Michel JB, Virmani R, Arbustini E, Pasterkamp G. Intraplaque haemorrhages as the trigger of plaque vulnerability. Eur Heart J. 2011. 32:1977–1985.
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr