J Korean Med Sci.  2009 Feb;24(1):62-68. 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.62.

Gene-to-Gene Interaction between Sodium Channel-Related Genes in Determining the Risk of Antiepileptic Drug Resistance

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea. mkkim@chonnam.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
  • 3Department of Neurology, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea.

Abstract

The pathogenesis of antiepileptic drug (AED) resistance is multifactorial. However, most candidate gene association studies typically assess the effects of candidate genes independently of each other, which is partly because of the limitations of the parametric-statistical methods for detecting the gene-to-gene interactions. A total of 200 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and 200 patients with drug-responsive epilepsy were genotyped for 3 representative the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the voltage-gated sodium channel genes (SCN1A, SCN1B, and SCN2A) by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing analysis. Besides the typical parametric statistical method, a new statistical method (multifactor dimensionality reduction [MDR]) was used to determine whether gene-to-gene interactions increase the risk of AED resistance. None of the individual genotypes or alleles tested in the present study showed a significant association with AED resistance, regardless of their theoretical functional value. With the MDR method, of three possible 2-locus genotype combinations, the combination of SCN2A-PM with SCN1B-PM was the best model for predicting susceptibility to AED resistance, with a p value of 0.0547. MDR, as an analysis paradigm for investigating multi-locus effects in complex disorders, may be a useful statistical method for determining the role of gene-to-gene interactions in the pathogenesis of AED resistance.

Keyword

Epilepsy; Drug Resistance; Pharmacogenetics; Sodium Channels

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adult
Alleles
Anticonvulsants/*therapeutic use
Case-Control Studies
Child
Child, Preschool
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Drug Resistance
Epilepsy/drug therapy/*genetics
Female
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genotype
Humans
Infant
Male
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Sodium Channels/*genetics

Figure

  • Fig. 1 A comparative analysis for estimating relative allele frequencies in a pool of DNA. Allele frequency in pooled DNA={[Reference Peak Height (Individual)/Reference Peak Height (Pool)]/[Heterozygote Peak Height (Individual)/Heterozygote Peak Height (Pool)]}×0.5. Black arrows indicate heterozygote peaks and red arrows indicate reference peaks.

  • Fig. 2 The four general steps involved in using the MDR method for case-control studies (adapted from Ritchie et al., 2001). In step 1, a set of n genetic factors is selected from the pool of all factors. In step 2, the n factors and their possible multifactor classes or cells are represented in n dimensional space. For example, for three loci with three genotypes each, there are 27 three-locus-genotype combinations. The ratio of the number of cases is then estimated within each multifactor class. In step 3, each multifactor cell in n-dimensional space is labeled either as "high-risk," if the cases:control ratio meets or exceeds the given threshold (e.g., ≥1.0), or as "low-risk," if that threshold is not exceeded. This reduces the n-dimensional model to a one-dimensional model. Finally, in step 4, the prediction error of each model is estimated by 10-fold cross-validation. Here, the data (i.e., subjects) are randomly divided into 10 equal parts. Each possible 9/10 of the subjects is used to make predictions regarding the disease status of each possible 1/10 of the subjects excluded. To reduce the possibility of poor prediction error estimates due to the chance division of the data set, the 10-fold cross-validation is repeated 10 times, and the prediction errors are averaged.

  • Fig. 3 Best multi-locus model for susceptibility to AED resistance. High-risk genotypes as revealed by MDR are in dark shading and the low-risk genotypes are in light shading. The numbers of individuals with refractory epilepsy are represented within each cell as the left-hand bar of the histogram and the number of individuals with responsive epilepsy are in the right-hand bar.

  • Fig. 4 The dendrogram demonstrates the nature of the interactions between SNPs. The colors used in the dendrogram comprise a spectrum of colors representing a continuum from synergy to redundancy.


Reference

1. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000. 342:314–319.
Article
2. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Refractory epilepsy: a progressive, intractable but preventable condition? Seizure. 2002. 11:77–84.
Article
3. Regesta G, Tanganelli P. Clinical aspects and biological bases of drug-resistant epilepsies. Epilepsy Res. 1999. 34:109–122.
Article
4. Traub RD, Borck C, Colling SB, Jefferys JG. On the structure of ictal events in vitro. Epilepsia. 1996. 37:879–891.
Article
5. Armijo JA, Shushtarian M, Valdizan EM, Cuadrado A, de las Cuevas I, Adin J. Ion channels and epilepsy. Curr Pharm Des. 2005. 11:1975–2003.
Article
6. Meldrum BS, Rogawski MA. Molecular targets for antiepileptic drug development. Neurotherapeutics. 2007. 4:18–61.
Article
7. Hirose S, Mitsudome A, Okada M, Kaneko S. Epilepsy Genetic Study Group, Japan. Genetics of idiopathic epilepsies. Epilepsia. 2005. 46:Suppl 1. 38–43.
8. Gibson G. Epistasis and pleiotropy as natural properties of transcriptional regulation. Theor Popul Biol. 1996. 49:58–89.
Article
9. Williams SM, Ritchie MD, Phillips JA 3rd, Dawson E, Prince M, Dzhura E, Willis A, Semenya A, Summar M, White BC, Addy JH, Kpodonu J, Wong LJ, Felder RA, Jose PA, Moore JH. Multilocus analysis of hypertension: a hierarchical approach. Hum Hered. 2004. 57:28–38.
Article
10. Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Roodi N, Bailey LR, Dupont WD, Parl FF, Moore JH. Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet. 2001. 69:138–147.
Article
11. Templeton AR. Wade M, Brodie B, Wolf J, editors. Epistasis and complex trait. Epistasis and evolutionary process. Oxford: Oxford University Press;213–231.
12. McNamara JO. Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Gilman AG, editors. Drugs effective in the therapy of the epilepsies. Goodmann & Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 2001. 10th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill;521–547.
13. Kwok PY, Carlson C, Yager TD, Ankener W, Nickerson DA. Comparative analysis of human DNA variations by fluorescence-based sequencing of PCR products. Genomics. 1994. 23:138–144.
Article
14. Evans WE, McLeod HL. Pharmacogenomics-drug disposition, drug targets, and side effects. N Engl J Med. 2003. 348:538–549.
15. Mann MW, Pons G. Various pharmacogenetic aspects of antiepileptic drug therapy: a review. CNS Drugs. 2007. 21:143–164.
16. Depondt C. The potential of pharmacogenetics in the treatment of epilepsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2006. 10:57–65.
Article
17. Siddiqui A, Kerb R, Weale ME, Brinkmann U, Smith A, Goldstein DB, Wood NW, Sisodiya SM. Association of multidrug resistance in epilepsy with a polymorphism in the drug-transporter gene ABCB1. N Engl J Med. 2003. 348:1442–1448.
18. Kim YO, Kim MK, Woo YJ, Lee MC, Kim JH, Park KW, Kim EY, Roh YI, Kim CJ. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the multidrug resistance 1 gene in Korean epileptics. Seizure. 2006. 15:67–72.
Article
19. Meisler MH, Kearney JA. Sodium channel mutations in epilepsy and other neurological disorders. J Clin Invest. 2005. 115:2010–2017.
Article
20. Kullmann DM, Hanna MG. Neurological disorders caused by inherited ion-channel mutations. Lancet Neurol. 2002. 1:157–166.
Article
21. Bang-Ce Y, Peng Z, Bincheng Y, Songyang L. Estimation of relative allele frequencies of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in different populations by microarray hybridization of pooled DNA. Anal Biochem. 2004. 333:72–78.
Article
22. Germer S, Holland MJ, Higuchi R. High-throughput SNP allele-frequency determination in pooled DNA samples by kinetic PCR. Genome Res. 2000. 10:258–266.
Article
23. Fakhrai-Rad H, Zheng J, Willis TD, Wong K, Suyenaga K, Moorhead M, Eberle J, Thorstenson YR, Jones T, Davis RW, Namsaraev E, Faham M. SNP discovery in pooled samples with mismatch repair detection. Genome Res. 2004. 14:1404–1412.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr