Kidney Res Clin Pract.  2024 Jul;43(4):433-443. 10.23876/j.krcp.23.321.

Association between systemic inflammation biomarkers and mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury receiving intensive care and continuous kidney replacement therapy: results from the RENERGY (REsearches for NEphRology and epidemioloGY) study

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2Clinical Trial Center, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
  • 6Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 7Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
  • 8Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background
Identifying risk factors and improving prognostication for mortality among patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) undergoing continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is important in improving the adverse prognosis of this patient population. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of existing systemic inflammation biomarkers and determine the optimal systemic inflammation biomarker in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CKRT. Methods: This multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included 1,500 patients with sepsis-associated AKI treated with intensive care and CKRT. The main predictor was a panel of 13 different systemic inflammation biomarkers. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality after CKRT initiation. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality after CKRT initiation, CKRT duration, kidney replacement therapy dependence at discharge, and lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays. Results: When added to the widely accepted Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR) and neutrophil-platelet score (NPS) had the highest improvements in prognostication of 28-day mortality, where the corresponding increases in C-statistic were 0.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00–0.02) and 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01–0.03). Similar findings were observed for 90-day mortality. The 28- and 90-day mortality rates were significantly lower for the higher PAR and NPS quartiles. These associations remained significant even after adjustment for potential confounding variables in multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Conclusion: Of the available systemic inflammation biomarkers, the addition of PAR or NPS to conventional ICU prediction models improved the prognostication of patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving intensive care and CKRT.

Keyword

Acute kidney injury; Biomarkers; Continuous renal replacement therapy; Inflammation; Sepsis
Full Text Links
  • KRCP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr