Endocrinol Metab.  2021 Feb;36(1):123-133. 10.3803/EnM.2020.860.

Molecular Correlates and Nuclear Features of Encapsulated Follicular-Patterned Thyroid Neoplasms

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan
  • 3Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Pathology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
  • 5Department of Pathology, Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Wuxi, China
  • 6Department of Pathology, Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • 7Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 8Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 9Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan
  • 10Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • 11Department of Pathology and Thyroid Disease Center, Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Japan

Abstract

Background
Assessing nuclear features is diagnostically challenging in the aspect of thyroid pathology. The aim of this study was to determine whether pathologists could distinguish BRAF-like and RAS-like nuclear features morphologically and identify morphological features to differentiate thyroid tumors with RAS-like mutations from encapsulated papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) with predominant follicular growth and BRAFV600E mutation.
Methods
Representative whole slide images of 16 encapsulated thyroid tumors with predominant follicular growth were reviewed by 12 thyroid pathologists using a web browser-based image viewer. Total nuclear score was calculated from semi-quantitatively scored eight nuclear features. The molecular profile of RAS and BRAF genes was determined by Sanger sequencing.
Results
Total nuclear score ranging 0 to 24 could differentiate BRAF-like tumors from RAS-like tumors with a cut-off value of score 14. The interobserver agreement was the highest for the assessment of nuclear pseudoinclusions (NPIs) but the lowest for nuclear elongation and sickle-shaped nuclei. NPIs were found in tumors with BRAFV600E mutation, but not in tumors with RAS-like mutations. Total nuclear scores were significantly higher for tumors with BRAFV600E than for those with RAS-like mutations (P<0.001).
Conclusion
Our results suggest that NPIs and high nuclear scores have diagnostic utility as rule-in markers for differentiating PTC with BRAFV600E mutation from benign or borderline follicular tumors with RAS-like mutations. Relaxation of rigid criteria for nuclear features resulted in an overdiagnosis of PTC. Immunostaining or molecular testing for BRAFV600E mutation is a useful adjunct for cases with high nuclear scores to identify true PTC.

Keyword

Thyroid cancer, papillary; Proto-oncogene proteins B-raf; Genes, ras; Thyroid neoplasms; Mutation; Medical overuse; Pathologists; Observer variation

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Representative images of nuclear features of encapsulated follicular-patterned tumors. The right column shows high power views of the same tumor in the left column (H&E stain, left, ×10; right, ×1,000). (A) Case A01 with BRAFV600E shows fully developed nuclear features of papillary thyroid carcinoma, including nuclear pseudoinclusions (arrow). (B) In case A03 with NRASQ61R mutation, a low power view shows a mixed microfollicular and macrofollicular pattern. Microfollicular areas reveal nuclear enlargement, nuclear crowding/overlapping, nuclear elongation, irregular contour of nuclear membrane, nuclear grooves, and chromatin clearing. (C) Case A11 with NRASQ61R mutation shows small round dark and enlarged ovoid pale nuclei.

  • Fig. 2 (A, B) Distribution of total scores of eight histologic nuclear features assessed by 12 pathologists in 16 encapsulated follicular-patterned thyroid tumors. Total nuclear scores are significantly higher for cases with BRAFV600E than for those with RAS-like mutations.

  • Fig. 3 Heatmap illustrating variations of nuclear scores and molecular types among 12 pathologists (A–L) in 16 encapsulated follicular-patterned thyroid tumors. Each pathologist blinded to molecular data assessed whether tumors were BRAF-like (BL) or RAS-like (RL) based on their histologic features. The number in each cell means the sum of the grading score of eight nuclear histologic features. Values in the far-right column of the table mean the sum of the nuclear scores of 16 cases for each pathologist. All pathologists are listed in order according to their sum of nuclear scores. In the far-left column, three pathologists marked in blue had a tendency to give high scores and over-interpret histologic nuclear features whereas three pathologists marked in orange had a tendency to give low scores and underestimate degrees of nuclear changes.

  • Fig. 4 Association between the sum of total nuclear scores and correct answer rate for molecular type by six pathologists. Nuclear scores assessed by six pathologists were summed up to denote the sum of nuclear scores on the Y-axis on the left side of the graph. Of 16 encapsulated follicular-patterned thyroid tumors, two cases A16 and A01 had BRAFV600E mutation and the remaining 14 cases had RAS-like mutations. All six pathologists interpreted whether each tumor was BRAF-like or RAS-like based on its histologic features. They correctly answered molecular types for 10/16 cases (case A16, A01, A10, A14, A13, A11, A06, A05, A08, and A09).

  • Fig. 5 Heatmap illustrating the distribution of total score of each histologic feature assessed by six pathologists selected (D–I) for 16 encapsulated follicular-patterned thyroid tumors. The number in each cell means the sum of points grading with each histologic feature interpreted by six pathologists.

  • Fig. 6 Nuclear pseudoinclusions and nuclear vacuoles mimicking nuclear pseudoinclusions. (A) An intranuclear cytoplasmic pesudoinclusion found in case A01 contains a round eosinophilic intranuclear body well demarcated by a rim of dense nuclear membrane. The color and texture are the same as the surrounding cytoplasm. Mimics of nuclear pseudoinclusions in case 12 (B) and case 04 (C) showed pale chromatin and irregularly shaped empty-looking nuclear vacuoles that lacked color and texture of the cytoplasm (arrows). Nucleoli were found within the nuclear vacuoles (H&E stain, ×1,000).


Cited by  4 articles

Update from the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Thyroid Tumors: A Standardized Diagnostic Approach
Chan Kwon Jung, Andrey Bychkov, Kennichi Kakudo
Endocrinol Metab. 2022;37(5):703-718.    doi: 10.3803/EnM.2022.1553.

The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023
Kennichi Kakudo, Chan Kwon Jung, Zhiyan Liu, Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa, Andrey Bychkov, Huy Gia Vuong, Somboon Keelawat, Radhika Srinivasan, Jen-Fan Hang, Chiung-Ru Lai
J Pathol Transl Med. 2023;57(6):289-304.    doi: 10.4132/jptm.2023.10.04.

Small Multi-Gene DNA Panel Can Aid in Reducing the Surgical Resection Rate and Predicting the Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules
Moon Young Oh, Hye-Mi Choi, Jinsun Jang, Heejun Son, Seung Shin Park, Minchul Song, Yoo Hyung Kim, Sun Wook Cho, Young Jun Chai, Woosung Chung, Young Joo Park
Endocrinol Metab. 2024;39(5):777-792.    doi: 10.3803/EnM.2024.2034.

Diagnostic challenges in the assessment of thyroid neoplasms using nuclear features and vascular and capsular invasion: a multi-center interobserver agreement study
Agnes Stephanie Harahap, Mutiah Mutmainnah, Maria Francisca Ham, Dina Khoirunnisa, Abdillah Hasbi Assadyk, Husni Cangara, Aswiyanti Asri, Diah Prabawati Retnani, Fairuz Quzwain, Hasrayati Agustina, Hermawan Istiadi, Indri Windarti, Krisna Murti, Muhammad Takbir, Ni Made Mahastuti, Nila Kurniasari, Nungki Anggorowati, Pamela Abineno, Yulita Pundewi Setyorini, Kennichi Kakudo
J Pathol Transl Med. 2024;58(6):299-309.    doi: 10.4132/jptm.2024.07.25.


Reference

1. Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Kloppel G, Rosai J. WHO classification of tumors of endocrine organs. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);2017. p. 65–91.
2. Zhu Y, Li Y, Jung CK, Song DE, Hang JF, Liu Z, et al. Histopathologic assessment of capsular invasion in follicular thyroid neoplasms-an observer variation study. Endocr Pathol. 2020; 31:132–40.
Article
3. Liu Z, Bychkov A, Jung CK, Hirokawa M, Sui S, Hong S, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the morphological evaluation of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features in Asian practice. Pathol Int. 2019; 69:202–10.
Article
4. Nikiforov YE, Seethala RR, Tallini G, Baloch ZW, Basolo F, Thompson LD, et al. Nomenclature revision for encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a paradigm shift to reduce overtreatment of indolent tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2:1023–9.
Article
5. Nikiforov YE, Baloch ZW, Hodak SP, Giordano TJ, Lloyd RV, Seethala RR, et al. Change in diagnostic criteria for noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillarylike nuclear features. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4:1125–6.
Article
6. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell. 2014; 159:676–90.
7. Fagin JA, Wells SA Jr. Biologic and clinical perspectives on thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:1054–67.
Article
8. Tirro E, Martorana F, Romano C, Vitale SR, Motta G, Di Gregorio S, et al. Molecular alterations in thyroid cancer: from bench to clinical practice. Genes (Basel). 2019; 10:709.
Article
9. Paulson VA, Shivdasani P, Angell TE, Cibas ES, Krane JF, Lindeman NI, et al. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features accounts for more than half of “carcinomas” harboring RAS mutations. Thyroid. 2017; 27:506–11.
Article
10. Kakudo K. Thyroid FNA cytology. 2nd ed. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd;2019. Chapter 21, Nuclear features of papillary thyroid carcinoma (BRAF-like tumors), noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (RAS-like tumors), and follicular adenoma/follicular thyroid carcinoma (RAS-like tumors). p. 173–9.
11. Hirokawa M, Carney JA, Goellner JR, DeLellis RA, Heffess CS, Katoh R, et al. Observer variation of encapsulated follicular lesions of the thyroid gland. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26:1508–14.
Article
12. Rosai J. The encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: back to the drawing board. Endocr Pathol. 2010; 21:7–11.
Article
13. Bychkov A, Jung CK, Liu Z, Kakudo K. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features in Asian practice: perspectives for surgical pathology and cytopathology. Endocr Pathol. 2018; 29:276–88.
Article
14. Bychkov A, Keelawat S, Agarwal S, Jain D, Jung CK, Hong S, et al. Impact of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a multi-institutional study in five Asian countries. Pathology. 2018; 50:411–7.
Article
15. Hirokawa M, Higuchi M, Suzuki A, Hayashi T, Kuma S, Miyauchi A. Prevalence and diagnostic significance of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features among tumors previously diagnosed as follicular adenoma: a single-institutional study in Japan. Endocr J. 2020; 67:1071–5.
Article
16. Zajkowska K, Kopczynski J, Gozdz S, Kowalska A. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features: a problematic entity. Endocr Connect. 2020; 9:R47–58.
Article
17. Cho U, Mete O, Kim MH, Bae JS, Jung CK. Molecular correlates and rate of lymph node metastasis of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features and invasive follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma: the impact of rigid criteria to distinguish non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features. Mod Pathol. 2017; 30:810–25.
Article
18. Jung CK, Kim Y, Jeon S, Jo K, Lee S, Bae JS. Clinical utility of EZH1 mutations in the diagnosis of follicular-patterned thyroid tumors. Hum Pathol. 2018; 81:9–17.
Article
19. Bychkov A, Kakudo K, Hong S. Current practices of thyroid fine-needle aspiration in Asia: a missing voice. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:517–20.
Article
20. Jung CK, Hong S, Bychkov A, Kakudo K. The use of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in patients with thyroid nodules in Asia: a brief overview of studies from the Working Group of Asian Thyroid FNA Cytology. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:571–8.
Article
21. Rossi ED, Bizzarro T, Martini M, Capodimonti S, Fadda G, Larocca LM, et al. Morphological parameters able to predict BRAF(V600E) mutated malignancies on thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: our institutional experience. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014; 122:883–91.
22. Legesse T, Parker L, Heath J, Staats PN. Distinguishing non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) from classic and invasive follicular-variant papillary thyroid carcinomas based on cytologic features. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2019; 8:11–7.
Article
23. Mahajan S, Agarwal S, Kocheri N, Jain D, Mathur SR, Iyer VK. Cytopathology of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features: a comparative study with similar patterned papillary thyroid carcinoma variants. Cytopathology. 2018; 29:233–40.
Article
24. Arora SK, Dey P. Intranuclear peudoinclusions: morphology, pathogenesis, and significance. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012; 40:741–4.
Article
25. Ip YT, Dias Filho MA, Chan JK. Nuclear inclusions and pseudoinclusions: friends or foes of the surgical pathologist? Int J Surg Pathol. 2010; 18:465–81.
Article
26. Das DK. Intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions in fine-needle aspiration smears of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a study of its morphological forms, association with nuclear grooves, and mode of formation. Diagn Cytopathol. 2005; 32:264–8.
Article
27. Alves VA, Kakudo K, LiVolsi V, Lloyd RV, Nikiforov YE, Nose V, et al. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP): achieving better agreement by refining diagnostic criteria. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018; 73:e576.
Article
28. Thompson LD, Poller DN, Kakudo K, Burchette R, Nikiforov YE, Seethala RR. An international interobserver variability reporting of the nuclear scoring criteria to diagnose noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features: a validation study. Endocr Pathol. 2018; 29:242–9.
Article
29. Choi JE, Bae JS, Lim DJ, Jung SL, Jung CK. Atypical histiocytoid cells and multinucleated giant cells in fine-needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid predict lymph node metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11:816.
Article
30. Selvaggi SM. The presence of multinucleated giant cells: noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features vs the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2019; 47:1007–10.
Article
31. Brooks E, Simmons-Arnold L, Naud S, Evans MF, Elhosseiny A. Multinucleated giant cells’ incidence, immune markers, and significance: a study of 172 cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2009; 3:95–9.
Article
32. Dvorak K, Aggeler B, Palting J, McKelvie P, Ruszkiewicz A, Waring P. Immunohistochemistry with the anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody: impact of pre-analytical conditions and concordance with DNA sequencing in colorectal and papillary thyroid carcinoma. Pathology. 2014; 46:509–17.
Article
33. Singarayer R, Mete O, Perrier L, Thabane L, Asa SL, Van Uum S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry in thyroid histopathology. Endocr Pathol. 2019; 30:201–18.
Article
34. Choden S, Keelawat S, Jung CK, Bychkov A. VE1 immunohistochemistry improves the limit of genotyping for detecting BRAFV600E mutation in papillary thyroid cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12:596.
Article
35. Bychkov A, Hirokawa M, Jung CK, Liu Z, Zhu Y, Hong SW, et al. Low rate of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features in Asian practice. Thyroid. 2017; 27:983–4.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ENM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr