J Korean Med Sci.  2020 Nov;35(45):e395. 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e395.

Fundamental Shifts in Research, Ethics and Peer Review in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic

• Barroga E
• Matanguihan GJ

• KMID: 2508804
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e395

Abstract

The era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to fundamental shifts in research, ethics, and peer review including reframing of the research design, adapting methodologies to the study type, transitioning of research mechanics, changing research methodologies, overcoming data collection and standardization constraints, upholding research standards and ethics, maintaining informativeness and social value, and providing guarded peer review flexibility. Indeed, the COVID-19 crisis, despite disrupting research worldwide to an unprecedented degree, has also become a catalyst to develop strategies of adaptation to this disruption. As the COVID-19 pandemic continuous to evolve, new, cost-effective, and highly flexible research models need to be developed. Planning is crucial for ensuring short-term and long-term contingency funds to support research logistics and personnel. A mental shift must accompany changes in methodologies to mentor and support researchers who are vital to the continuity of high-caliber research in the long term. A global research perspective through interinstitutional and interprofessional collaboration will sustain adherence to the highest standards of data collection and research reporting.

Keyword

COVID-19; Data Collection; Ethics; Peer Review; Research Design; Research Methodology

Reference

1. Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): the epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020; 55(3):105924. PMID: 32081636.

2. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020; 395(10223):470–473. PMID: 31986257.

3. Witze A. Universities will never be the same after the coronavirus crisis. Nature. 2020; 582(7811):162–164. PMID: 32504014.

4. Weiner DL, Balasubramaniam V, Shah SI, Javier JR. Pediatric Policy Council. COVID-19 impact on research, lessons learned from COVID-19 research, implications for pediatric research. Pediatr Res. 2020; 88(2):148–150. PMID: 32544922.

5. Clay RA. Conducting research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Updated 2020. Accessed October 3, 2020. https://www.apa.org/news/apa/2020/03/conducting-research-covid-19.

6. Ahmed S, Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Moving towards online rheumatology education in the era of COVID-19. Clin Rheumatol. 2020; 39(11):3215–3222. PMID: 32939569.

7. Saberi P. Research in the time of coronavirus: continuing ongoing studies in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. AIDS Behav. 2020; 24(8):2232–2235. PMID: 32303924.

8. Hussain Z. Field research in lockdown: revisiting slow science in the time of COVID-19. Updated 2020. Accessed October 4, 2020. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/wps/2020/04/29/field-research-in-lockdown-revisiting-slow-science-in-the-time-of-covid-19/.

9. Hawkins K, Amegee J, Steege R. Remote research methods to use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Updated 2020. Accessed October 3, 2020. http://www.ariseconsortium.org/remote-research-methods-to-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/.

10. Barroga E. Enhancing clear expression of research questions, hypotheses, and objectives through effective use of scientific English. Cent Asian J Med Hypotheses Ethics. 2020; 1(1):63–65.

11. Yakhontova T. Conventions of English research discourse and the writing of non-Anglophone authors. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(40):e331. PMID: 33075853.

12. University of Technology Sydney (UTS). Nippon Foundation Ocean Nexus Center. Adapting research methodologies in the COVID-19 pandemic. Updated 2020. Accessed October 6, 2020. https://earthlab.uw.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2020/07/uts-adapting-research-methodologies-covid-19-pandemic-resources-researchers-1.pdf.

13. Shehata MH, Abouzeid E, Wasfy NF, Abdelaziz A, Wells RL, Ahmed SA. Medical education adaptations post COVID-19: an Egyptian reflection. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020; 7:1–9.

14. Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Casey MG, Lawless M. Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int J Qual Methods. 2019; 18:1–8.

15. Raimondo E, Vaessen J, Branco M. Adapting evaluation designs in times of COVID-19 (coronavirus): four questions to guide decisions. Updated 2020. Accessed October 1, 2020. https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/blog/adapting-evaluation-designs-times-covid-19-coronavirus-four-questions-guide-decisions.

16. Zimba O, Radchenko O, Strilchuk L. Social media for research, education and practice in rheumatology. Rheumatol Int. 2020; 40(2):183–190. PMID: 31863133.

17. Omary MB, Eswaraka J, Kimball SD, Moghe PV, Panettieri RA Jr, Scotto KW. The COVID-19 pandemic and research shutdown: staying safe and productive. J Clin Invest. 2020; 130(6):2745–2748. PMID: 32243259.

18. Ansoms A. Research in times of crisis: caring for researchers' mental health in the COVID-19 era. Updated 2020. Accessed October 6, 2020. https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/social-research-and-insecurity/research-in-times-of-crisis-caring-for-researchers-mental-health-in-the-covid-19-era/.

19. Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(6):510–512. PMID: 32283003.

20. Samuels F. Tips for collecting primary data in a COVID-19 era (Toolkits June 2020). Updated 2020. Accessed October 5, 2020. https://www.odi.org/publications/16977-primary-data-collection-covid-19-era.

21. Samuels F. Tips for collecting primary data in a COVID-19 era. Updated 2020. Accessed October 5, 2020. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/primary_data_collection_emerging_analysis_and_ideas_1.pdf.

22. Gupta L, Gasparyan AY, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Zimba O, Yessirkepov M. Information and misinformation on COVID-19: a cross-sectional survey study. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(27):e256. PMID: 32657090.

23. Arts D, McGill L. Leveraging standardised data in response to the novel coronavirus outbreak. Med Writ. 2020; 29(2):32–35.

24. London AJ, Kimmelman J. Against pandemic research exceptionalism. Science. 2020; 368(6490):476–477. PMID: 32327600.

25. Piller C, Servick K. Two elite medical journals retract coronavirus papers over data integrity questions. Science. Forthcoming. 2020; DOI: 10.1126/science.abd1697.

26. Campbell M. Is research quality being compromised during the COVID-19 pandemic? Updated 2020. Accessed October 4, 2020. https://www.technologynetworks.com/tn/articles/is-research-quality-being-compromised-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-333849.

27. Gianola S, Jesus TS, Bargeri S, Castellini G. Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0240123. PMID: 33022014.

28. Wehner MR, Li Y, Nead KT. Comparison of the proportions of female and male corresponding authors in preprint research repositories before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(9):e2020335. PMID: 32940678.

29. Servick K. COVID-19 data scandal prompts tweaks to elite journal's review process. Science. 2020.

30. Hopkins JS. Lancet medical journal changes peer-review process amid flurry of COVID-19 research. Updated 2020. Accessed on October 13, 2020. https://www.wsj.com/articles/lancet-medical-journal-changes-peer-review-process-amid-flurry-of-covid-19-research-11600451859.

31. Barroga E. Innovative strategies for peer review. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(20):e138. PMID: 32449322.

32. Gertel A. Rush to publication – What do we have to lose? Med Writ. 2020; 29(2):14–15.

33. Gupta L, Gasparyan AY, Zimba O, Misra DP. Scholarly publishing and journal targeting in the time of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of rheumatologists and other specialists. Rheumatol Int. 2020; 40(12):2023–2030. PMID: 33048199.