Healthc Inform Res.  2024 Jul;30(3):277-285. 10.4258/hir.2024.30.3.277.

Scientific Publication Speed of Korean Medical Journals during the COVID-19 Era

• Seo H
• Kim Y
• Kim D
• Kang H
• Park C
• Park S
• Kang J
• Oh J
• Kang H
• Han MA

• KMID: 2558323
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2024.30.3.277

Abstract

Objectives
This study compared the scientific publication speeds of Korean medical journals before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era.
Methods
We analyzed 2,064 papers from 43 international Korean medical journals, selecting 12 papers annually from 2019 to 2022. We assessed publication speed indicators, including the time from submission to revision and from submission to publication. Additionally, we examined variations in publication speed based on journal and paper characteristics, including whether the studies were related to COVID-19.
Results
Among the 43 journals analyzed, 39.5% disclosed the peer review duration from submission to the first decision, and 11.6% reported their acceptance rates. The average time from submission to acceptance was 127.0 days in 2019, 126.1 days in 2020, 124.6 days in 2021, and 126.4 days in 2022. For COVID-19-related studies, the average time from submission to revision was 61.4 days, compared to 105.1 days for non-COVID-19 studies; from submission to acceptance, it was 87.4 days for COVID-19-related studies and 127.1 days for non-COVID-19 studies. All indicators for COVID-19-related studies showed shorter durations than those for non-COVID-19 studies, and the proportion of studies accepted within 30 or 60 days was significantly higher for COVID-19-related studies.
Conclusions
This study investigated the publication speed of Korean international medical journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic influenced journals’ review and publication processes, potentially impacting the quality of academic papers. These findings provide insights into publication speeds during the COVID-19 era, suggesting that journals should focus on maintaining the integrity of their publication and review processes.

Keyword

COVID-19, Editorial Policies, Journal Article, Peer Review, Publications

Reference

References

1. Horbach SP. Pandemic publishing: medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19. Quant Sci Stud. 2020; 1(3):1056–67. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00076.

2. Raynaud M, Goutaudier V, Louis K, Al-Awadhi S, Dubourg Q, Truchot A, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on publication dynamics and non-COVID-19 research production. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021; 21(1):255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01404-9.

3. Schonhaut L, Costa-Roldan I, Oppenheimer I, Pizarro V, Han D, Diaz F. Scientific publication speed and retractions of COVID-19 pandemic original articles. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022; 46:e25. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.25.

4. Park C, Park S, Seo H, Oh J, Kim D, Kang J, et al. Impact factor surge in Korean medical journals during the COVID-19 era: a bibliometric study. Sci Ed. 2023; 11(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.320.

5. Perlis RH, Kendall-Taylor J, Hart K, Ganguli I, Berlin JA, Bradley SM, et al. Peer review in a general medical research journal before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(1):e2253296. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53296.

6. Paul RA, Brody J, Geppert CMA. The peer review process during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fed Pract. 2021; 38(7):298–9. https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0157.

7. Behera BK, Radhakrishnan RV, Mohanty CR, Bellapukonda S. COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on peer review speed of anesthesiology journals: an observational study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021; 37(1):57–62. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_652_20.

8. Chawla S, Shelly S, Phord-Toy R, Khosa F. Need for speed: investigating publication times and impact factors of plastic surgery journals. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9(10):e3838. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003838.

9. Wicherts JM. Peer review quality and transparency of the peer-review process in open access and subscription journals. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0147913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147913.

10. Superchi C, Gonzalez JA, Sola I, Cobo E, Hren D, Boutron I. Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0688-x.