J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2019;16:29. 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.29.

Peer-assisted feedback: a successful approach for providing feedback on United States Medical Licensing Exam-style clinical skills exam notes in the United States

• Nagoshi K
• Zaidi Z
• Wright A
• Stalvey C

• KMID: 2502169
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.29

Abstract

Purpose
Peer-assisted learning (PAL) promotes the development of communication, facilitates improvements in clinical skills, and is a way to provide feedback to learners. We utilized PAL as a conceptual framework to explore the feasibility of peer-assisted feedback (PAF) to improve note-writing skills without requiring faculty time. The aim was to assess whether PAL was a successful method to provide feedback on the United States Medical Licensing Exams (USMLE)-style clinical skills exam notes by using student feedback on a survey in the United States.
Methods
The University of Florida College of Medicine administers clinical skills examination (CSEs) that include USMLE-like note-writing. PAL, in which students support the learning of their peers, was utilized as an alternative to faculty feedback. Second-year (MS2) and third-year (MS3) medical students taking CSEs participated in faculty-run note-grading sessions immediately after testing, which included explanations of grading rubrics and the feedback process. Students graded an anonymized peer’s notes. The graded material was then forwarded anonymously to its student author to review. Students were surveyed on their perceived ability to provide feedback and the benefits derived from PAF using a Likert scale (1–6) and open-ended comments during the 2017–2018 academic year.
Results
Students felt generally positively about the activity, with mean scores for items related to educational value of 4.49 for MS2s and 5.11 for MS3s (out of 6). MS3s perceived peer feedback as constructive, felt that evaluating each other’s notes was beneficial, and felt that the exercise would improve their future notes. While still positive, MS2 students gave lower scores than the MS3 students.
Conclusion
PAF was a successful method of providing feedback on student CSE notes, especially for MS3s. MS2s commented that although they learned during the process, they might be more invested in improving their note-writing as they approach their own USMLE exam.

Keyword

Clinical competence; Feedback; Medical students; Peer group; United States

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Students’ perception of peer-assisted learning sessions: CSE 2 versus CSE 3. CSE, clinical skills examination.

Reference

References

1. Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) and National Board of Medical Examine. The United States Medical Licensing Examination: USMLE Step 2 CS [Internet]. Philadelphia (PA): United States Medical Licensing Examination;2019. [cited 2019 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.usmle.org/step-2-cs/.

2. Da Dalt L, Callegaro S, Mazzi A, Scipioni A, Lago P, Chiozza ML, Zacchello F, Perilongo G. A model of quality assurance and quality improvement for post-graduate medical education in Europe. Med Teach. 2010; 32:e57–e64. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903199734.

3. Yu TC, Wilson NC, Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Hawken SJ, Hill AG. Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011; 2:157–172. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14383.

4. Tai J, Molloy E, Haines T, Canny B. Same-level peer-assisted learning in medical clinical placements: a narrative systematic review. Med Educ. 2016; 50:469–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12898.

5. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

6. Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1035. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1035.

7. Burgess A, Oates K, Goulston K. Role modelling in medical education: the importance of teaching skills. Clin Teach. 2016; 13:134–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12397.

8. Henderson P, Ferguson-Smith AC, Johnson MH. Developing essential professional skills: a framework for teaching and learning about feedback. BMC Med Educ. 2005; 5:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-11.

9. Henderson P, Johnson MH, Barnett M, Weaver S. Supporting medical students to take responsibility for developing their communication skills. Med Teach. 2001; 23:86–87. https://doi.org/10:1080/0142159002005686.

10. Ross MT, Cameron HS. Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE guide no. 30. Med Teach. 2007; 29:527–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701665886.