Cancer Res Treat.  2016 Apr;48(2):727-737. 10.4143/crt.2014.350.

Altered Biological Potential and Radioresponse of Murine Tumors in Different Microenvironments

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jsseong@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Biochemistry, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiation Treatment Research, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Cancer Metastasis Research Center, Yonsei Institute for Cancer Research, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study was conducted to evaluate the biological features of murine hepatocarcinoma according to different tumor microenvironmental models and to determine the change in molecular and immunologic responses after radiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tumor models were established in the liver (orthotopic) and thigh (heterotopic) of male C3H/HeN mice. Tumor growth and lung metastasis were assessed in these models. To evaluate the radiation effect, the tumors were irradiated with 10 Gy. Factors associated with tumor microenvironment including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1), CD31, and serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) were evaluated. Tumor-infiltrating regulatory immune cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) were also analyzed.
RESULTS
A higher number of lung metastases were observed in the orthotopic tumor model than in the heterotopic tumor model. VEGF, CD31, COX-2, and TGF-β1 expression was more prominent in the orthotopic tumor model than in the heterotopic tumor model. Expression of the angiogenic factor VEGF and key regulatory molecules (TGF-β1 and COX-2) decreased following radiation in the orthotopic tumor model, while the serum IL-6 level increased after radiation. In the orthotopic tumor model, the number of both Tregs and MDSCs in the tumor burden decreased after radiation.
CONCLUSION
The orthotopic tumor model showed higher metastatic potential and more aggressive molecular features than the heterotopic tumor model. These findings suggest that the orthotopic tumor mouse model may be more reflective of the tumor microenvironment and suitable for use in the translational research of radiation treatment.

Keyword

Tumor microenvironment; Hepatocarcinoma; Radiation

MeSH Terms

Angiogenesis Inducing Agents
Animals
Cyclooxygenase 2
Humans
Interleukin-6
Liver
Lung
Male
Mice
Neoplasm Metastasis
Radiation Effects
T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory
Thigh
Transforming Growth Factor beta1
Translational Medical Research
Tumor Burden
Tumor Microenvironment
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
Angiogenesis Inducing Agents
Cyclooxygenase 2
Interleukin-6
Transforming Growth Factor beta1
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Tumor cells were implanted in the thigh muscle (arrow) in the heterotopic tumor model (A) and at a subcapsular site (arrow) in the liver in the orthotopic tumor model (B). The frequency of lung metastases (arrows) was determined after fixation with Bouin’s solution (C) under a light microscope. The number of metastatic lung nodules was higher in the orthotopic tumor model than in the heterotopic tumor model (D). The number of metastatic lung nodules was found to significantly increase in the orthotopic tumor model at 6 (p=0.03), 9 (p=0.02), 12 (p=0.01), and 15 days (p=0.01) after tumor implantation. Groups consisted of six mice each.

  • Fig. 2. (A) The orthotopic tumor model showed intense cytoplasmic immunoreactivity (×400). N, peritumor normal liver; T, tumor tissue. (B) The immunohistochemical stains of CD31 (arrows) for heterotopic and orthotopic tumor model (×400). (C) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein levels were elevated in the orthotopic tumor model (O) compared with the heterotopic tumor model (H). CD31 expression was also higher in the orthotopic model than in the heterotopic tumor model. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. (D) Microvessel density using CD31 increased significantly in the orthotopic tumor model (**p < 0.01). Arrows indicate the microvessels of positive CD31 immunohistochemical staining. The number of mice was six per group.

  • Fig. 3. (A) Orthotopic and heterotopic tumor models demonstrated intense transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1) immunoreactivity (×400). N, peritumor normal liver; T, tumor tissue. (B) The orthotopic tumor model showed predominant expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in the cytoplasm of peripheral tumor tissue (×400). (C) Western blot assays using antibodies against TGF-β1 and COX-2 in the orthotopic (O) and heterotopic (H) tumor models showed higher TGF-β1 and COX-2 expression in the orthotopic model than in the heterotopic tumor model. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

  • Fig. 4. Immunohistochemical staining with antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in the heterotopic and orthotopic tumor models (A-C). After radiation, staining for VEGF, TGF-β1, and COX-2 decreased in the orthotopic tumor model (×400), while the tumor compartment in the heterotopic tumor model showed no significant responses after radiation (3 days after radiation). (D) These findings were confirmed in the orthotopic tumor model by western blot assay. Expression of VEGF, TGF-β1, and COX-2 in tumor tissues decreased after radiation, not in peritumoral normal tissue. (E) Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) increased after irradiation in heterotopic and orthotopic tumor models (p=0.01 and p=0.01), and the orthotopic tumor model showed a significantly higher level of IL-6 than the heterotopic tumor model (p < 0.01). Increased serum VEGF levels were also measured in the orthotopic tumor model and this level was reduced after irradiation in the orthotopic tumor model, but the difference was not significant (F). The sampling number was six per group. N/L, normal liver of naive mouse; N, normal peritumor liver; T, tumor; RT, radiation treatment; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

  • Fig. 5. Immune cell expression after radiation (n=4 mice per each group). Irradiated orthotopic tumor samples were obtained on the third day after radiation. (A) The frequency of total CD4 and CD8 T cells in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are shown in the irradiated and non-irradiated orthotopic tumor model. In tumor bearing mice (TM-bearing) mice, the frequency of CD4 and CD8 T cells showed no significant difference after radiation. (B) The number of CD25+Foxp3 Treg cells in the tumor was significantly decreased after radiation (p < 0.05). (C) Myeloid-derived suppressor cell CD11b+Gr-1+ expression was also significantly decreased after radiation (p < 0.05). Treg, regulatory T cell; RT, radiation treatment; ns, not significant.


Reference

References

1. Weinberg RA. The biology of cancer. New York: Garland Science;2007.
2. Oppenheimer SB. Cellular basis of cancer metastasis: a review of fundamentals and new advances. Acta Histochem. 2006; 108:327–34.
Article
3. Cretu A, Brooks PC. Impact of the non-cellular tumor microenvironment on metastasis: potential therapeutic and imaging opportunities. J Cell Physiol. 2007; 213:391–402.
Article
4. Tofilon PJ, Basic I, Milas L. Prediction of in vivo tumor response to chemotherapeutic agents by the in vitro sister chromatid exchange assay. Cancer Res. 1985; 45:2025–30.
5. Meyn RE, Stephens LC, Ang KK, Hunter NR, Brock WA, Milas L, et al. Heterogeneity in the development of apoptosis in irradiated murine tumours of different histologies. Int J Radiat Biol. 1993; 64:583–91.
Article
6. Lee EJ, Park HJ, Lee IJ, Kim WW, Ha SJ, Suh YG, et al. Inhibition of IL-17A suppresses enhanced-tumor growth in low dose pre-irradiated tumor beds. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e106423.
Article
7. Kim W, Seong J, An JH, Oh HJ. Enhancement of tumor radioresponse by wortmannin in C3H/HeJ hepatocarcinoma. J Radiat Res. 2007; 48:187–95.
Article
8. Weidner N. Current pathologic methods for measuring intratumoral microvessel density within breast carcinoma and other solid tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995; 36:169–80.
Article
9. Park HJ, Kusnadi A, Lee EJ, Kim WW, Cho BC, Lee IJ, et al. Tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells delineated by upregulation of PD-1 and inhibitory receptors. Cell Immunol. 2012; 278:76–83.
Article
10. Gao YS, Chen XP, Li KY, Wu ZD. Nude mice model of human hepatocellular carcinoma via orthotopic implantation of histologically intact tissue. World J Gastroenterol. 2004; 10:3107–11.
Article
11. Morikawa K, Walker SM, Jessup JM, Fidler IJ. In vivo selection of highly metastatic cells from surgical specimens of different primary human colon carcinomas implanted into nude mice. Cancer Res. 1988; 48:1943–8.
12. Onogawa S, Kitadai Y, Tanaka S, Kuwai T, Kuroda T, Chayama K. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C and VEGF-D expression by the organ microenvironment in human colon carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2004; 40:1604–9.
Article
13. Benoy IH, Salgado R, Elst H, Van Dam P, Weyler J, Van Marck E, et al. Relative microvessel area of the primary tumour, and not lymph node status, predicts the presence of bone marrow micrometastases detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in patients with clinically non-metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2005; 7:R210–9.
Article
14. Guang-Wu H, Sunagawa M, Jie-En L, Shimada S, Gang Z, Tokeshi Y, et al. The relationship between microvessel density, the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and the extension of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2000; 110:2066–9.
Article
15. Huang SP, Wu MS, Wang HP, Yang CS, Kuo ML, Lin JT. Correlation between serum levels of interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor in gastric carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002; 17:1165–9.
Article
16. Mouthon MA, Vandamme M, van der Meeren A, Gourmelon P, Gaugler MH. Inflammatory response to abdominal irradiation stimulates hemopoiesis. Int J Radiat Biol. 2001; 77:95–103.
17. Chou CH, Chen PJ, Jeng YM, Cheng AL, Huang LR, Cheng JC. Synergistic effect of radiation and interleukin-6 on hepatitis B virus reactivation in liver through STAT3 signaling pathway. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75:1545–52.
Article
18. Wei LH, Kuo ML, Chen CA, Chou CH, Lai KB, Lee CN, et al. Interleukin-6 promotes cervical tumor growth by VEGF-dependent angiogenesis via a STAT3 pathway. Oncogene. 2003; 22:1517–27.
Article
19. Pang YL, Zhang HG, Peng JR, Pang XW, Yu S, Xing Q, et al. The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009; 58:877–86.
Article
20. Saraiva M, O'Garra A. The regulation of IL-10 production by immune cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010; 10:170–81.
Article
21. Komatsu N, Hori S. Full restoration of peripheral Foxp3+ regulatory T cell pool by radioresistant host cells in scurfy bone marrow chimeras. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104:8959–64.
Article
22. Bos PD, Plitas G, Rudra D, Lee SY, Rudensky AY. Transient regulatory T cell ablation deters oncogene-driven breast cancer and enhances radiotherapy. J Exp Med. 2013; 210:2435–66.
Article
23. Rech AJ, Vonderheide RH. Clinical use of anti-CD25 antibody daclizumab to enhance immune responses to tumor antigen vaccination by targeting regulatory T cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1174:99–106.
Article
24. Saha A, Chatterjee SK. Combination of CTL-associated antigen-4 blockade and depletion of CD25 regulatory T cells enhance tumour immunity of dendritic cell-based vaccine in a mouse model of colon cancer. Scand J Immunol. 2010; 71:70–82.
25. Deng L, Liang H, Burnette B, Beckett M, Darga T, Weichselbaum RR, et al. Irradiation and anti-PD-L1 treatment synergistically promote antitumor immunity in mice. J Clin Invest. 2014; 124:687–95.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr