Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2019 May;12(2):181-189. 10.21053/ceo.2018.00493.

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Induces MUC5AC and MUC5B Expression in Human Nasal Airway Epithelial Cells

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck surgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea. ydkim@med.yu.ac.kr
  • 2Regional Center for Respiratory Diseases, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is known to be associated with inflammatory airway diseases, and three major transmembrane receptors: double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase-like ER kinase, inositol requiring enzyme 1, and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) play important roles in ER stress-related proinflammatory signaling. However, the effects of ER stress and these three major signaling pathways on the regulation of the production of airway mucins in human nasal airway epithelial cells have not been elucidated.
METHODS
In primary human nasal epithelial cells, the effect of tunicamycin (an ER stress inducer) and 4-phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA, ER stress inhibitor) on the expression of MUC5AC and MUC5B was investigated by reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction, real-time polymerase chain reaction, enzyme immunoassay, and immunoblot analysis. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection was used to identify the mechanisms involved.
RESULTS
Tunicamycin increased the expressions of MUC5AC and MUC5B and the mRNA expressions of ER stress-related signaling molecules, including spliced X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1), transcription factor CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP), and ATF6. In addition, 4-PBA attenuated the tunicamycin-induced expressions of MUC5AC and MUC5B and the mRNA expressions of ER stress-related signaling molecules. Furthermore, siRNA knockdowns of XBP-1, CHOP, and ATF6 blocked the tunicamycin-induced mRNA expressions and glycoprotein productions of MUC5AC and MUC5B.
CONCLUSION
.: These results demonstrate that ER stress plays an important role in the regulation of MUC5AC and MUC5B via the activations of XBP-1, CHOP, and ATF6 in human nasal airway epithelial cells.

Keyword

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress; X-Box Binding Protein 1; Transcription Factor CHOP; Activating Transcription Factor 6; Mucins

MeSH Terms

Activating Transcription Factor 6
Carrier Proteins
CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins
Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress*
Endoplasmic Reticulum*
Epithelial Cells*
Glycoproteins
Humans*
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Inositol
Mucins
Phosphotransferases
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA, Messenger
RNA, Small Interfering
Transcription Factor CHOP
Transcription Factors
Transfection
Tunicamycin
Activating Transcription Factor 6
CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins
Carrier Proteins
Glycoproteins
Inositol
Mucins
Phosphotransferases
RNA, Messenger
RNA, Small Interfering
Transcription Factor CHOP
Transcription Factors
Tunicamycin

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Effects of tunicamycin (TM; an endoplasmic reticulum stress inducer) on the expressions of MUC5AC and MUC5B in human nasal epithelial cells. (A, B) Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and real-time PCR showed that TM significantly increased the mRNA expressions of MUC5AC and MUC5B at all concentrations examined. (C) Time-dependent changes, real-time PCR showed that TM induced the expressions of MUC5AC and MUC5B mRNA at all times. However, peak times differed; MUC5AC peaked after 4 hours of exposure to TM, whereas MUC5B peaked after 8 hours of exposure. (D) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) showed TM induced the productions of MUC5AC and MUC5B glycoproteins. Effects of 4-phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA; an endoplasmic reticulum stress inhibitor) on the TM-induced expressions of MUC5AC and MUC5B in human nasal epithelial cells. (E-G) RT-PCR and real-time PCR showed that 4-PBA significantly attenuated the TM-induced expressions of MUC5AC and MUC5B mRNA. (H) ELISA also showed that 4-PBA significantly attenuated TM-induced the productions of MUC5AC and MUC5B glycoprotein. The images shown are representative of three separate experiments performed in triplicate. Bars represent the averages±standard deviation of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. a)P<0.05 vs. baseline. b)P<0.05 vs. TM (0.5 µg/mL) alone.

  • Fig. 2. The roles of the three major endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated signaling pathways (IRE1/XBP-1, PERK/ATF4/CHOP, and ATF6) on the expressions of MUC5AC and MUC5B in human nasal epithelial cells. (A-D) Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and real-time PCR showed that the mRNA expressions of sXBP-1, CHOP, or ATF6 were significantly increased at all doses of tunicamycin (TM; 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5 µg/mL) administered and that these increases were attenuated by 4-phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA). (E-G) Western blot also showed that TM induced XBP-1, CHOP and ATF6 and attenuated by 4-PBA. The images shown are representative of three separate experiments performed in triplicate. Bars represent the averages±standard deviation of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. sXBP-1, spliced X-box binding protein 1; CHOP, CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; XBP-1, X-box binding protein 1; IRE1, inositol requiring enzyme 1; PERK, RNA-activated protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; ATF4, activating transcription factor 4. a)P<0.05 vs. baseline. b)P<0.05 vs. TM (0.5 µg/mL) alone.

  • Fig. 3. Contributions of the three major pathways to the upregulation of MUC5AC expression by endoplasmic reticulum stress in human nasal epithelial cells. (A-I) Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), real-time PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay showed that small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdowns of XBP-1, CHOP, or ATF6 significantly blocked the endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced MUC5AC mRNA expression and glycoprotein production. (A-C) Inhibition by XBP-1 siRNA was greatest. (D-I) Inhibitions by CHOP and ATF6 siRNA were limited, and inhibition by CHOP siRNA was weakest. The images shown are representative of three separate experiments performed in triplicate. Bars represent the averages±standard deviation of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; TM, tunicamycin; XBP-1, X-box binding protein 1; Con, control; CHOP, CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6. a)P<0.05 vs. control siRNA. b)P<0.05 vs. TM (0.5 µg/mL) with control siRNA.

  • Fig. 4. Contributions of the three major pathways to the upregulation of MUC5B expression by endoplasmic reticulum stress in human nasal epithelial cells. (A-I) Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), real-time PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay showed that small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdowns of XBP-1, CHOP, or ATF6 significantly blocked the endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced MUC5B mRNA expression and glycoprotein production. (D-F) Inhibition by CHOP siRNA was greatest. (A-C, G-I) Inhibitions by XBP-1 and ATF6 siRNA were limited, and inhibition by XBP-1 siRNA was weakest. The images shown are representative of three separate experiments performed in triplicate. Bars represent the averages±standard deviation of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; TM, tunicamycin; Con, control; XBP-1, X-box binding protein 1; CHOP, CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6. a)P<0.05 vs. control siRNA. b)P<0.05 vs. TM (0.5 µg/mL) with control siRNA.


Reference

1. Cao SS, Luo KL, Shi L. Endoplasmic reticulum stress interacts with inflammation in human diseases. J Cell Physiol. 2016; Feb. 231(2):288–94.
Article
2. Hasnain SZ, Lourie R, Das I, Chen AC, McGuckin MA. The interplay between endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammation. Immunol Cell Biol. 2012; Mar. 90(3):260–70.
Article
3. Kim SR, Lee YC. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the related signaling networks in severe asthma. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2015; Mar. 7(2):106–17.
Article
4. Wei J, Rahman S, Ayaub EA, Dickhout JG, Ask K. Protein misfolding and endoplasmic reticulum stress in chronic lung disease. Chest. 2013; Apr. 143(4):1098–105.
Article
5. Martino MB, Jones L, Brighton B, Ehre C, Abdulah L, Davis CW, et al. The ER stress transducer IRE1β is required for airway epithelial mucin production. Mucosal Immunol. 2013; May. 6(3):639–54.
Article
6. Mijosek V, Lasitschka F, Warth A, Zabeck H, Dalpke AH, Weitnauer M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress is a danger signal promoting innate inflammatory responses in bronchial epithelial cells. J Innate Immun. 2016; Aug. 8(5):464–78.
Article
7. Delmotte P, Sieck GC. Interaction between endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticulum stress (ER/SR stress), mitochondrial signaling and Ca(2+) regulation in airway smooth muscle (ASM). Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2015; Feb. 93(2):97–110.
Article
8. Ali MS, Pearson JP. Upper airway mucin gene expression: a review. Laryngoscope. 2007; May. 117(5):932–8.
Article
9. Rose MC, Voynow JA. Respiratory tract mucin genes and mucin glycoproteins in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2006; Jan. 86(1):245–78.
Article
10. Roy MG, Livraghi-Butrico A, Fletcher AA, McElwee MM, Evans SE, Boerner RM, et al. Muc5b is required for airway defence. Nature. 2014; Jan. 505(7483):412–6.
Article
11. Ha EV, Rogers DF. Novel therapies to inhibit mucus synthesis and secretion in airway hypersecretory diseases. Pharmacology. 2016; Jan. 97(1-2):84–100.
Article
12. Voynow JA, Rubin BK. Mucins, mucus, and sputum. Chest. 2009; Feb. 135(2):505–12.
Article
13. Song SY, Woo HJ, Bae CH, Kim YW, Kim YD. Expression of leptin receptor in nasal polyps: leptin as a mucosecretagogue. Laryngoscope. 2010; May. 120(5):1046–50.
Article
14. Kim YD, Bae CH, Song SY, Choi YS. Effect of beta-glucan on MUC4 and MUC5B expression in human airway epithelial cells. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015; Aug. 5(8):708–15.
15. Ron D, Walter P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007; Jul. 8(7):519–29.
Article
16. Oyadomari S, Mori M. Roles of CHOP/GADD153 in endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Death Differ. 2004; Apr. 11(4):381–9.
Article
17. Garg AD, Kaczmarek A, Krysko O, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV, Agostinis P. ER stress-induced inflammation: does it aid or impede disease progression. Trends Mol Med. 2012; Oct. 18(10):589–98.
Article
18. Jorgensen E, Stinson A, Shan L, Yang J, Gietl D, Albino AP. Cigarette smoke induces ndoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response in normal and malignant human lung cells. BMC Cancer. 2008; Aug. 8:229.
Article
19. Kim SR, Kim DI, Kang MR, Lee KS, Park SY, Jeong JS, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress influences bronchial asthma pathogenesis by modulating nuclear factor kappaB activation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; Dec. 132(6):1397–408.
20. Martino ME, Olsen JC, Fulcher NB, Wolfgang MC, O’Neal WK, Ribeiro CM. Airway epithelial inflammation-induced endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ store expansion is mediated by X-box binding protein-1. J Biol Chem. 2009; May. 284(22):14904–13.
Article
21. Kim YM, Jin J, Choi JA, Cho SN, Lim YJ, Lee JH, et al. Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress response is associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Clin Biochem. 2014; Jan. 47(1-2):96–103.
Article
22. Schroeder BW, Verhaeghe C, Park SW, Nguyenvu LT, Huang X, Zhen G, et al. AGR2 is induced in asthma and promotes allergen-induced mucin overproduction. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012; Aug. 47(2):178–85.
Article
23. Kirkham S, Sheehan JK, Knight D, Richardson PS, Thornton DJ. Heterogeneity of airways mucus: variations in the amounts and glycoforms of the major oligomeric mucins MUC5AC and MUC5B. Biochem J. 2002; Feb. 361(Pt 3):537–46.
Article
24. Morcillo EJ, Cortijo J. Mucus and MUC in asthma. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2006; Jan. 12(1):1–6.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr