1. Oertel W, Ross JS, Eggert K, Adler G. Rationale for transdermal drug administration in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2007; 69:4 Suppl 1. S4–S9.
Article
2. Choi SH, Park KW, Na DL, Han HJ, Kim EJ, Shim YS, et al. Tolerability and efficacy of memantine add-on therapy to rivastigmine transdermal patches in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011; 27:1375–1383.
Article
3. Winblad B, Kawata AK, Beusterien KM, Thomas SK, Wimo A, Lane R, et al. Caregiver preference for rivastigmine patch relative to capsules for treatment of probable Alzheimer's disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007; 22:485–491.
Article
4. Lee JH, Sevigny J. Effects of body weight on tolerability of rivastigmine transdermal patch: a post-hoc analysis of a double-blind trial in patients with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2011; 25:58–62.
Article
5. Winblad B, Cummings J, Andreasen N, Grossberg G, Onofrj M, Sadowsky C, et al. A six-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer's disease--rivastigmine patch versus capsule. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007; 22:456–467.
Article
6. Cummings JL, Farlow MR, Meng X, Tekin S, Olin JT. Rivastigmine transdermal patch skin tolerability: results of a 1-year clinical trial in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Clin Drug Investig. 2010; 30:41–49.
7. Widman TJ, Oostman H, Storrs FJ. Allergic contact dermatitis from medical adhesive bandages in patients who report having a reaction to medical bandages. Dermatitis. 2008; 19:32–37.
Article
8. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDSADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984; 34:939–944.
Article
9. Kang Y, Na DL, Hahn S. A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 1997; 15:300–308.
10. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993; 43:2412–2414.
11. Choi SH, Na DL, Lee BH, Hahm DS, Jeong JH, Yoon SJ, et al. Estimating the Validity of the Korean Version of Expanded Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2001; 19:585–591.
12. Bae JN, Cho MJ. Development of the Korean version of the Geriatric Depression Scale and its short form among elderly psychiatric patients. J Psychosom Res. 2004; 57:297–305.
Article
13. Ku HM, Kim JH, Kwon EJ, Kim SH, Lee HS, Ko HJ, et al. A study on the reliability and validity of Seoul-instrumental activities of daily livings (S-IADL). J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2004; 43:189–199.
14. Winblad B, Grossberg G, Frölich L, Farlow M, Zechner S, Nagel J, et al. IDEAL: a 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the first skin patch for Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2007; 69:4 Suppl 1. S14–S22.
Article
15. Choi SH, Kim SY, Na HR, Kim BK, Yang DW, Kwon JC, et al. Effect of ApoE genotype on response to donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008; 25:445–450.
Article
16. Darreh-Shori T, Jelic V. Safety and tolerability of transdermal and oral rivastigmine in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease dementia. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2010; 9:167–176.
Article
17. Nakamura Y, Imai Y, Shigeta M, Graf A, Shirahase T, Kim H, et al. A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the rivastigmine patch in Japanese patients with Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2011; 1:163–179.
Article
18. Articus K, Baier M, Tracik F, Kühn F, Preuss UW, Kurz A. A 24-week, multicentre, open evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of the rivastigmine patch in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease. Int J Clin Pract. 2011; 65:790–796.
Article
19. Pregelj P. Safety and tolerability of rivastigmine transdermal patch formulation in newly diagnosed patients with Alzheimer's dementia in naturalistic conditions. Psychogeriatrics. 2012; 12:165–171.
Article
20. Kulkantrakorn K, Tanyakitpisal P, Towanabut S, Dejthevaporn C, Rangseekajee P, Pongpakdee S, et al. Rivastigmine patch for treatment of Alzheimer's disease in clinical practice in Thailand. Psychogeriatrics. 2013; 13:1–8.
Article
21. Gauthier S, Robillard A, Cohen S, Black S, Sampalis J, Colizza D, et al. Real-life effectiveness and tolerability of the rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: the EMBRACE study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013; 29:989–1000.
Article
22. Segers K, Cytryn E, Surquin M. Do local meteorological conditions influence skin irritation caused by transdermal rivastigmine? A retroprospective, pilot study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012; 32:412–415.
Article
23. Upadhye MR, Maibach HI. Influence of area of application of allergen on sensitization in contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1992; 27:281–286.
Article
24. Hurkmans JF, Boddé HE, Van Driel LM, Van Doorne H, Junginger HE. Skin irritation caused by transdermal drug delivery systems during long-term (5 days) application. Br J Dermatol. 1985; 112:461–467.
Article
25. Ale I, Lachapelle JM, Maibach HI. Skin tolerability associated with transdermal drug delivery systems: an overview. Adv Ther. 2009; 26:920–935.
Article
26. Waller JM, Maibach HI. Age and skin structure and function, a quantitative approach (I): blood flow, pH, thickness, and ultrasound echogenicity. Skin Res Technol. 2005; 11:221–235.
Article
27. Waller JM, Maibach HI. Age and skin structure and function, a quantitative approach (II): protein, glycosaminoglycan, water, and lipid content and structure. Skin Res Technol. 2006; 12:145–154.
Article
28. Fisher AA. Dermatitis due to transdermal therapeutic systems. Cutis. 1984; 34:526–527.
29. Beltrani VS, Beltrani VP. Contact dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997; 78:160–173. quiz 174-176.
Article
30. Di Giampaolo L, Di Donato A, Antonucci A, Paiardini G, Travaglini P, Spagnoli G, et al. Follow up study on the immune response to low frequency electromagnetic fields in men and women working in a museum. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2006; 19:4 Suppl. 37–42.
31. Gangi S, Johansson O. A theoretical model based upon mast cells and histamine to explain the recently proclaimed sensitivity to electric and/or magnetic fields in humans. Med Hypotheses. 2000; 54:663–671.
Article