Transl Clin Pharmacol.  2018 Mar;26(1):25-31. 10.12793/tcp.2018.26.1.25.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of metformin administered as fixed-dose combination in Korean healthy adults

Affiliations
  • 1PIPET (Pharmacometrics Institute for Practical Education and Training), College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea. waystolove@catholic.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul 06591, Korea.
  • 3Q-fitter, Inc., Seoul 06591, Korea.
  • 4Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.

Abstract

Metformin, an oral antihyperglycemic agent, is widely used as the first-line pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It has been in use for several decades as numerous different formulations. However, despite its use, population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling of metformin is not well developed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of formulation on PK parameters by developing a population PK model of metformin in Koreans and using this model to assess bioequivalence. We used a comparative PK study of a single agent and a fixed-dose combination of metformin in 36 healthy volunteers. The population PK model of metformin was developed using NONMEM (version 7.3). Visual predictive checks and bootstrap methods were performed to determine the adequacy of the model. The plasma concentration-time profile was best described by a two-compartment, first-order elimination model with first-order absorption followed by zeroorder absorption with lag time. From the covariate analysis, formulation had significant effect (p < 0.01) on relative bioavailability (F = 0.94) and first-order absorption constant (Ka = 0.83), but the difference was within the range of bioequivalence criteria. No other covariate was shown to have significant effect on PK parameters. The PK profile of the disposition phase was consistent with the published literature. However, in the present study, the multiple peaks found during the absorption phase implied the possible diversity of absorption PK profile depending on formulation or population. Unlike traditional bioequivalence analysis, the population PK model reflects formulation differences on specific parameters and reflected simulation can be performed.

Keyword

Metformin; NONMEM; Korean; Pharmacokinetics

MeSH Terms

Absorption
Adult*
Biological Availability
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Drug Therapy
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Metformin*
Pharmacokinetics
Plasma
Therapeutic Equivalency
Metformin

Figure

  • Figure 1 Individual plasma concentration versus time plots of metformin. The bold red line is the median value; (A) single agent (B) FDC agent.

  • Figure 2 Metformin PK model. Ka, first-order absorption rate constant; F1, fraction of the dose absorbed through first-order absorption; D2, duration of zero-order absorption; ALAG2, lag time of zero-order absorption; CL/F, apparent clearance; Q/F, apparent intercompartmental clearance.

  • Figure 3 Basic goodness-of-fit plots of the final model. The black solid y=x or y=0 lines are included for reference. The bold red lines are the loess (local regression smoothing) trend lines.

  • Figure 4 Visual predictive checks (A) Metformin single agent (B) FDC agent; The circles represent the observed metformin concentrations. The dashed line and grey area represent the median and 90% prediction intervals of simulation, respectively.


Reference

1. Graham GG, Punt J, Arora M, Day RO, Doogue MP, Duong JK, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011; 50:81–98. DOI: 10.2165/11534750-000000000-00000. PMID: 21241070.
Article
2. Scheen AJ. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996; 30:359–371. PMID: 8743335.
Article
3. Tucker GT, Casey C, Phillips PJ, Connor H, Ward JD, Woods HF. Metformin kinetics in healthy subjects and in patients with diabetes mellitus. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1981; 12:235–246. PMID: 7306436.
Article
4. Gong L, Goswami S, Giacomini KM, Altman RB, Klein TE. Metformin pathways: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012; 22:820–827. PMID: 22722338.
5. Chitnis SD, Han Y, Yamaguchi M, Mita S, Zhao R, Sunkara G, et al. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and noncompartment analysis demonstrated bioequivalence between metformin component of metformin/vildagliptin fixed-dose combination products and metformin immediate-release tablet source from various countries. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2016; 5:40–51. PMID: 27119577.
6. Davies NM, Takemoto JK, Brocks DR, Yanez JA. Multiple peaking phnomena in pharmacokinetic disposition. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010; 49:351–377. PMID: 20481648.
7. Pentikäinen PJ, Neuvonen PJ, Penttilä A. Pharmacokinetics of metformin after intravenous and oral administration to man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1979; 16:195–202. PMID: 499320.
Article
8. Vidon N, Chaussade S, Noel M, Franchisseur C, Huchet B, Bernier JJ. Metformin in the digestive tract. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1988; 4:223–229. PMID: 3359923.
Article
Full Text Links
  • TCP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr