Korean J Physiol Pharmacol.  2018 Sep;22(5):577-584. 10.4196/kjpp.2018.22.5.577.

The change of signaling pathway on the electrical stimulated contraction in streptozotocin-induced bladder dysfunction of rats

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea. udsohn@cau.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, College of Convergence Science and Technology, Jung Won University, Goesan 28054, Korea.
  • 3Pharmaceutical Formulation Design Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University , Seoul 06974, Korea.
  • 4Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea.

Abstract

Bladder dysfunction is a common complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). However, there have been a few studies evaluating bladder smooth muscle contraction in DM in the presence of pharmacological inhibitors. In the present study, we compared the contractility of bladder smooth muscle from normal rats and DM rats. Furthermore, we utilized pharmacological inhibitors to delineate the mechanisms underlying bladder muscle differences between normal and DM rats. DM was established in 14 days after using a single injection of streptozotocin (65 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) in Sprague-Dawley rats. Bladder smooth muscle contraction was induced electrically using electrical field stimulation consisting of pulse trains at an amplitude of 40 V and pulse duration of 1 ms at frequencies of 2-10 Hz. In this study, the pharmacological inhibitors atropine (muscarinic receptor antagonist), U73122 (phospholipase C inhibitor), DPCPX (adenosine A₁ receptor antagonist), udenafil (PDE5 inhibitor), prazosin (α₁-receptor antagonist), verapamil (calcium channel blocker), and chelerythrine (protein kinase C inhibitor) were used to pretreat bladder smooth muscles. It was found that the contractility of bladder smooth muscles from DM rats was lower than that of normal rats. In addition, there were significant differences in percent change of contractility between normal and DM rats following pretreatment with prazosin, udenafil, verapamil, and U73122. In conclusion, we suggest that the decreased bladder muscle contractility in DM rats was a result of perturbations in PLC/IP₃-mediated intracellular Ca²âº release and PDE5 activity.

Keyword

Bladder; Contractility; Diabetes; Phospholipase C; Smooth muscle

MeSH Terms

Animals
Atropine
Diabetes Mellitus
Muscle, Smooth
Phosphotransferases
Prazosin
Rats*
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Streptozocin
Type C Phospholipases
Urinary Bladder*
Verapamil
Atropine
Phosphotransferases
Prazosin
Streptozocin
Type C Phospholipases
Verapamil

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Representative traces and tension comparison for electrical field stimulation-induced contraction of bladder smooth muscle from normal and diabetic rats. (A) Electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced contraction. The left and right sides are NM and DM rats, respectively. (B) Average tension of EFS contraction for muscles from normal (NM) and rats with diabetes mellitus (DM rats). (A, B) EFS stimulation was administered at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Hz. Each point represents the mean±standard error of the mean (SEM), where n=13. *Indicates statistically significant (p<0.05) when evaluated by Student's t-test and ### indicates statistically significant (p<0.001) when evaluated by two-way ANOVA.

  • Fig. 2 Changes in contraction of smooth bladder muscles from normal and DM rats following atropine treatment. EFS-induced contractions of muscles from normal and DM rats. Atropine was added at 10−6 M. EFS was administered using 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Hz. Each point represents the mean±SEM, where n=6.

  • Fig. 3 Changes in contraction of bladder smooth muscles from normal and DM rats following prazosin treatment. EFS-induced contractions of muscles from normal and DM rats. Prazosin was added at 10−6 M. EFS was administered at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Hz. Each point represents the mean±SEM, where n=6. ### indicates statistically significant (p<0.001) based on two-way ANOVA.

  • Fig. 4 Changes in contraction of bladder smooth muscles from normal and DM rats following DPCPX treatment. EFS-induced contractions in muscles from normal and DM rats. DPCPX was added at 10−6 M. EFS was administered at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Hz. Each point represents the mean±SEM, where n=6.

  • Fig. 5 Changes in contractions of bladder smooth muscles from normal and DM rats following verapamil and U73122 treatment. (A) EFS-induced contractions following 10−6 M verapamil treatment. (B) EFS-induced contractions following 10−6 M U73122 treatment. EFS was administered at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Hz. Each point represents the mean±SEM, where n=6. ## and ### indicate statistical significance (p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively) based on two-way ANOVA.

  • Fig. 6 Changes in contractions of bladder smooth muscles from normal and DM rats following udenafil and NaHS treatment. (A) EFS-induced contractions following 10−6 M udenafil treatment. (B) EFS-induced contractions following 10−6 M NaHS treatment. EFS was administered at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Hz. Each point represents the mean±SEM, where n=6. ### indicates statistically significant (p<0.001) based on two-way ANOVA.

  • Fig. 7 Changes in contractions of bladder smooth muscles from normal and DM rats following chelerythrine treatment. EFS-induced contractions following addition of 10−6 M chelerythrine. EFS was administered at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Hz. Each point represents the mean±SEM, where n=6.

  • Fig. 8 Summary of mechanistic changes in smooth muscle bladder contraction in DM rats. Both G protein-coupled receptor- and nitric oxide-mediated intracellular signaling pathways are involved in changes in the contraction or relaxation of bladder smooth muscle. Grey symbols () indicate signaling pathway differences between normal and DM rats. Phospholipase C generates the intracellular second messenger IP3 from the membrane lipid PIP2. IP3 then induces Ca2+ release and the released Ca2+ binds to calmodulin. Ca2+/calmodulin activates MLCK, which phosphorylates myosin light chain, thus leading to contraction. In bladder smooth muscles from DM rats, changes in G protein-coupled receptor-mediated phospholipase C signaling affects IP3-dependent Ca2+ release and changes in PDE5 affect contraction or relaxation. These factors are expected to result in a decrease in bladder contractility. DM, diabetes mellitus; EFS, electrical field stimulation; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; PLC, phospholipase C; DAG, diacylglycerol; IP3, inositol trisphosphate; CaM, calmodulin; MLCK, myosin light chain kinase; MLC-P, myosin light chain phosphatase; NO, nitric oxide; PKG, protein kinase G; PDE5, phosphodiesterase 5.


Reference

1. Pecoits-Filho R, Abensur H, Betônico CC, Machado AD, Parente EB, Queiroz M, Salles JE, Titan S, Vencio S. Interactions between kidney disease and diabetes: dangerous liaisons. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016; 8:50.
Article
2. Weissman AJ. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354:1751–1752. author reply 1751-1752.
Article
3. Amaral N, Okonko DO. Metabolic abnormalities of the heart in type II diabetes. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2015; 12:239–248.
Article
4. Tuttle KR, Bakris GL, Bilous RW, Chiang JL, de Boer IH, Goldstein-Fuchs J, Hirsch IB, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Narva AS, Navaneethan SD, Neumiller JJ, Patel UD, Ratner RE, Whaley-Connell AT, Molitch ME. Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014; 64:510–533.
Article
5. Van Den Eeden SK, Sarma AV, Rutledge BN, Cleary PA, Kusek JW, Nyberg LM, McVary KT, Wessells H. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Research Group. Effect of intensive glycemic control and diabetes complications on lower urinary tract symptoms in men with type 1 diabetes: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32:664–670.
Article
6. Ioanid CP, Noica N, Pop T. Incidence and diagnostic aspects of the bladder disorders in diabetics. Eur Urol. 1981; 7:211–214.
Article
7. Bradley WE. Diagnosis of urinary bladder dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1980; 92:323–326.
Article
8. Kaplan SA, Te AE, Blaivas JG. Urodynamic findings in patients with diabetic cystopathy. J Urol. 1995; 153:342–344.
Article
9. Todd JK, Mack AJ. A study of human bladder detrusor muscle. Br J Urol. 1969; 41:448–454.
Article
10. Andersson KE, Arner A. Urinary bladder contraction and relaxation: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2004; 84:935–986.
Article
11. Wang P, Luthin GR, Ruggieri MR. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes mediating urinary bladder contractility and coupling to GTP binding proteins. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995; 273:959–966.
12. Park SY, Je HD, Shim JH, Sohn UD. Characteristics of spontaneous contraction in the circular smooth muscles of cat ileum. Arch Pharm Res. 2010; 33:159–165.
Article
13. Sjögren C, Andersson KE, Husted S, Mattiasson A, Moller-Madsen B. Atropine resistance of transmurally stimulated isolated human bladder muscle. J Urol. 1982; 128:1368–1371.
Article
14. Min CH, Min YS, Lee SJ, Sohn UD. The comparative effects of aminoglycoside antibiotics and muscle relaxants on electrical field stimulation response in rat bladder smooth muscle. Arch Pharm Res. 2016; 39:863–870.
Article
15. Min CH, Wang Y, Bae J, Han JH, Sohn UD. The inhibitory mechanism of gentamicin on electrical field stimulation response in rat bladder smooth muscle. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2015; 19:473–478.
Article
16. Braverman AS, Tibb AS, Ruggieri MR Sr. M2 and M3 muscarinic receptor activation of urinary bladder contractile signal transduction. I. Normal rat bladder. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006; 316:869–874.
Article
17. Kullmann FA, Downs TR, Artim DE, Limberg BJ, Shah M, Contract D, de Groat WC, Rosenbaum JS. Urothelial beta-3 adrenergic receptors in the rat bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011; 30:144–150.
Article
18. Vesela R, Aronsson P, Tobin G. Functional and morphological examinations of P1A1 purinoceptors in the normal and inflamed urinary bladder of the rat. Auton Neurosci. 2011; 159:26–31.
Article
19. Johansson R, Pandita RK, Poljakovic M, Garcia-Pascual A, De Vente J, Persson K. Activity and expression of nitric oxide synthase in the hypertrophied rat bladder and the effect of nitric oxide on bladder smooth muscle growth. J Urol. 2002; 168:2689–2694.
Article
20. Matsumoto S, Hanai T, Uemura H. Chronic treatment with a PDE5 inhibitor increases contractile force of normal bladder in rats. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010; 42:53–56.
Article
21. Dombkowski RA, Doellman MM, Head SK, Olson KR. Hydrogen sulfide mediates hypoxia-induced relaxation of trout urinary bladder smooth muscle. J Exp Biol. 2006; 209:3234–3240.
Article
22. Patacchini R, Santicioli P, Giuliani S, Maggi CA. Pharmacological investigation of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) contractile activity in rat detrusor muscle. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005; 509:171–177.
Article
23. Patacchini R, Santicioli P, Giuliani S, Maggi CA. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) stimulates capsaicin-sensitive primary afferent neurons in the rat urinary bladder. Br J Pharmacol. 2004; 142:31–34.
Article
24. Mustafa S, Ismael HN. Reactivity of diabetic urinary bladder to the cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine. Urology. 2014; 84:1549.e1–1549.e5.
Article
25. Daneshgari F, Liu G, Imrey PB. Time dependent changes in diabetic cystopathy in rats include compensated and decompensated bladder function. J Urol. 2006; 176:380–386.
Article
26. Longhurst PA, Belis JA. Abnormalities of rat bladder contractility in streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1986; 238:773–777.
27. Je HD, Park SY, Barber AL, Sohn UD. The inhibitory effect of rosiglitazone on agonist-induced or spontaneous regulation of contractility. Arch Pharm Res. 2007; 30:461–468.
Article
28. Waring JV, Wendt IR. Effects of streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus on intracellular calcium and contraction of longitudinal smooth muscle from rat urinary bladder. J Urol. 2000; 163:323–330.
Article
29. Belis JA, Curley RM, Wagner CH, Murty VN, Winter SJ, Rohner TJ Jr. Neurogenic function of the diabetic rat bladder: alteration by calcium channel effectors. Pharmacology. 1991; 43:273–281.
Article
30. Poladia DP, Bauer JA. Early cell-specific changes in nitric oxide synthases, reactive nitrogen species formation, and ubiquitinylation during diabetes-related bladder remodeling. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2003; 19:313–319.
Article
31. Adela R, Nethi SK, Bagul PK, Barui AK, Mattapally S, Kuncha M, Patra CR, Reddy PN, Banerjee SK. Hyperglycaemia enhances nitric oxide production in diabetes: a study from South Indian patients. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0125270.
Article
32. Golbidi S, Laher I. Bladder dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Front Pharmacol. 2010; 1:136.
Article
33. Huang L, Chen D, Li S. Streptozotocin diabetes attenuates the effects of nondepolarizing neuromuscular relaxants on rat muscles. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014; 18:461–467.
Article
34. Michel MC, Vrydag W. Alpha1-, alpha2- and beta-adrenoceptors in the urinary bladder, urethra and prostate. Br J Pharmacol. 2006; 147:Suppl 2. S88–S119.
35. Kudlacz EM, Gerald MC, Wallace LJ. Effects of diabetes and diuresis on contraction and relaxation mechanisms in rat urinary bladder. Diabetes. 1989; 38:278–284.
Article
36. Yu W, Zacharia LC, Jackson EK, Apodaca G. Adenosine receptor expression and function in bladder uroepithelium. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006; 291:C254–C265.
Article
37. Martinson EA, Johnson RA, Wells JN. Potent adenosine receptor antagonists that are selective for the A1 receptor subtype. Mol Pharmacol. 1987; 31:247–252.
38. Lohse MJ, Klotz KN, Lindenborn-Fotinos J, Reddington M, Schwabe U, Olsson RA. 8-Cyclopentyl-,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX)--a selective high affinity antagonist radioligand for A1 adenosine receptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1987; 336:204–210.
39. Schulte G, Fredholm BB. Signalling from adenosine receptors to mitogen-activated protein kinases. Cell Signal. 2003; 15:813–827.
Article
40. Bucheimer RE, Linden J. Purinergic regulation of epithelial transport. J Physiol. 2004; 555:311–321.
Article
41. Inoue R, Brading AF. The properties of the ATP-induced depolarization and current in single cells isolated from the guinea-pig urinary bladder. Br J Pharmacol. 1990; 100:619–625.
Article
42. Zhu X, Zhai K, Mi Y, Ji G. Expression and function of phosphodiesterases (PDEs) in the rat urinary bladder. BMC Urol. 2017; 17:54.
Article
43. Rybalkin SD, Yan C, Bornfeldt KE, Beavo JA. Cyclic GMP phosphodiesterases and regulation of smooth muscle function. Circ Res. 2003; 93:280–291.
Article
44. Tong YC, Chin WT, Cheng JT. Alterations in urinary bladder M2-muscarinic receptor protein and mRNA in 2-week streptozotocininduced diabetic rats. Neurosci Lett. 1999; 277:173–176.
Article
45. Sand C, Michel MC. Bradykinin contracts rat urinary bladder largely independently of phospholipase C. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014; 348:25–31.
Article
46. Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV. Ca2+ sensitivity of smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin II: modulated by G proteins, kinases, and myosin phosphatase. Physiol Rev. 2003; 83:1325–1358.
Article
47. Levy J, Gavin JR 3rd, Sowers JR. Diabetes mellitus: a disease of abnormal cellular calcium metabolism. Am J Med. 1994; 96:260–273.
Article
48. Kim SJ, Park JH, Song DK, Park KS, Lee JE, Kim ES, Cho KB, Jang BK, Chung WJ, Hwang JS, Kwon JG, Kim TW. Alterations of colonic contractility in long-term diabetic rat model. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011; 17:372–380.
Article
49. Iltis I, Kober F, Desrois M, Dalmasso C, Lan C, Portha B, Cozzone PJ, Bernard M. Defective myocardial blood flow and altered function of the left ventricle in type 2 diabetic rats: a noninvasive in vivo study using perfusion and cine magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2005; 40:19–26.
Full Text Links
  • KJPP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr