Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr.  2018 Apr;21(2):93-100. 10.5223/pghn.2018.21.2.93.

Usefulness of Assessment of Stool Form by the Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale in Primary Care Pediatrics

• Gulati R
• Komuravelly A
• Leb S
• Mhanna MJ
• Ghori A
• Leon J
• Needlman R

• KMID: 2409360
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2018.21.2.93

Abstract

PURPOSE
Rome criteria are considered the gold standard for diagnosing functional constipation. The modified Bristol stool form scale (m-BSFS) was validated to measure stool form in children. However, neither the potential use of the m-BSFS as a tool to facilitate the diagnosis of potential constipation, nor the agreement between m-BSFS and stool consistency by Rome has been studied. Our objective is to determine if m-BSFS is a reliable tool to facilitat detection of constipation; and the agreement between stool form by m-BSFS and hard stool criteria in Rome.
METHODS
A survey tool with the Rome III criteria and the m-BSFS was developed. A Likert-scale addressed frequency of each stool form on the m-BSFS. Responses to Rome III and m-BSFS were compared.
RESULTS
The sensitivity and specificity of the m-BSFS was 79.2% and 66.0% respectively; and in children <4 years. improved to 81.2% and 75.0% respectively. There was poor agreement between hard stools by m-BSFS and the painful or hard bowel movement question of Rome Criteria.
CONCLUSION
The potential utility of m-BSFS as a reasonably good tool to facilitate the diagnosis of potential constipation in children is shown. The poor agreement between painful or hard stool question in Rome III, and ratings for hard stool on the m-BSFS illustrates that one's perception may differ between a question and a picture. A useful pictorial tool to appraise stool form may, thus, be a favorable complement in the process of enquiry about bowel habits in well-child care.

Keyword

Constipation; Rome criteria; Modified Bristol form; Stool consistency

MeSH Terms

Child
Complement System Proteins
Constipation
Diagnosis
Humans
Pediatrics*
Primary Health Care*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Complement System Proteins

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Study flow diagram.

Reference

1. van den Berg MM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of childhood constipation: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:2401–2409.

2. Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011; 25:3–18.

3. Baker SS, Liptak GS, Colletti RB, Croffie JM, Di Lorenzo C, Ector W, et al. Constipation in infants and children: evaluation and treatment. A medical position statement of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999; 29:612–626.

4. Uc A, Hyman PE, Walker LS. Functional gastrointestinal disorders in African American children in primary care. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006; 42:270–274.

5. Burgers R, Bonanno E, Madarena E, Graziano F, Pensabene L, Gardner W, et al. The care of constipated children in primary care in different countries. Acta Paediatr. 2012; 101:677–680.

6. Youssef NN, Langseder AL, Verga BJ, Mones RL, Rosh JR. Chronic childhood constipation is associated with impaired quality of life: a case-controlled study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005; 41:56–60.

7. Rappaport L, Landman G, Fenton T, Levine MD. Locus of control as predictor of compliance and outcome in treatment of encopresis. J Pediatr. 1986; 109:1061–1064.

8. Liem O, Harman J, Benninga M, Kelleher K, Mousa H, Di Lorenzo C. Health utilization and cost impact of childhood constipation in the United States. J Pediatr. 2009; 154:258–262.

9. Sommers T, Corban C, Sengupta N, Jones M, Cheng V, Bollom A, et al. Emergency department burden of constipation in the United States from 2006 to 2011. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110:572–579.

10. Bongers ME, van Wijk MP, Reitsma JB, Benninga MA. Long-term prognosis for childhood constipation: clinical outcomes in adulthood. Pediatrics. 2010; 126:e156–e162.

11. Loening-Baucke V. Constipation in early childhood: patient characteristics, treatment, and longterm follow up. Gut. 1993; 34:1400–1404.

12. Arbuckle RA, Carson RT, Abetz-Webb L, Hyams J, Di Lorenzo C, Lewis BE, et al. Measuring the symptoms of pediatric constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: expert commentary and literature review. Patient. 2014; 7:343–364.

13. Tabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, et al. Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014; 58:258–274.

14. Carmo RL, Oliveira RP, Ribeiro AE, Lima MC, Amorim BJ, Ribeiro AF, et al. Colonic transit in children and adolescents with chronic constipation. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2015; 91:386–391.

15. Zaslavsky C, da Silveira TR, Maguilnik I. Total and segmental colonic transit time with radio-opaque markers in adolescents with functional constipation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998; 27:138–142.

16. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997; 32:920–924.

17. Degen LP, Phillips SF. How well does stool form reflect colonic transit? Gut. 1996; 39:109–113.

18. Chumpitazi BP, Lane MM, Czyzewski DI, Weidler EM, Swank PR, Shulman RJ. Creation and initial evaluation of a Stool Form Scale for children. J Pediatr. 2010; 157:594–597.

19. van Tilburg MA, Rouster A, Silver D, Pellegrini G, Gao J, Hyman PE. Development and validation of a Rome III functional gastrointestinal disorders questionnaire for infants and toddlers. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016; 62:384–386.

20. Lane MM, Czyzewski DI, Chumpitazi BP, Shulman RJ. Reliability and validity of a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for children. J Pediatr. 2011; 159:437–441.

21. Loening-Baucke V. Prevalence rates for constipation and faecal and urinary incontinence. Arch Dis Child. 2007; 92:486–489.

22. Geoffrey RS, Cynthia B, Graham AB 3rd, Brown OW, Hardin A, Lessin HR, et al. 2014 recommendations for pediatric preventive health care. Pediatrics. 2014; 133:568–570.

23. Hagan JF, Shaw JS, Duncan PM. Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents. American Academy of Pediatrics;2007.

24. Wald ER, Jagodzinski TD, Moyer SC, Wald A, Eickhoff JC, Edmonson MB. Validation and clinical utility of a bowel habit questionnaire in school-age children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011; 53:520–523.

25. Loening-Baucke V. Chronic constipation in children. Gastroenterology. 1993; 105:1557–1564.

26. Devanarayana NM, Rajindrajith S. Bowel habits and behaviors related to defecation in 10- to 16-year-olds: impact of socioeconomic characteristics and emotional stress. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011; 52:569–573.

27. Russo M, Martinelli M, Sciorio E, Botta C, Miele E, Vallone G, et al. Stool consistency, but not frequency, correlates with total gastrointestinal transit time in children. J Pediatr. 2013; 162:1188–1192.

28. Saps M, Nichols-Vinueza DX, Mintjens S, Pusatcioglu CK, Velasco-Benítez CA. Construct validity of the pediatric Rome III criteria. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014; 59:577–581.