Intest Res.  2018 Jan;16(1):142-146. 10.5217/ir.2018.16.1.142.

Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in a patient with ulcerative colitis

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. takagast@keio.jp
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • 3Department of Bacteriology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
  • 4Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan.
  • 5Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been reported as a safe and effective therapy in patients with refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). FMT has also been reported as a promising therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Both, CDI and UC, are believed to be caused by dysbiosis, such as altered compositions or decreased diversity of the intestinal microbiota. This report describes a patient with UC in remission with a second recurrent episode of CDI, who was treated with FMT. A single FMT performed via colonoscopy completely resolved the patient's diarrhea and eradicated C. difficile bacteriologically without any severe complications. Molecular biological analysis of the patient's fecal microbiota showed that FMT could dramatically change the altered composition of intestinal microbiota and restore its diversity. Despite the restoration of the intestinal microbiota, FMT could not prevent a relapse of UC in this patient. However, it improved the intestinal symptoms of CDI and could prevent further recurrences of CDI.

Keyword

Fecal microbiota transplantation; Clostridium difficile; Colitis, ulcerative

MeSH Terms

Clostridium difficile*
Clostridium*
Colitis, Ulcerative*
Colonoscopy
Diarrhea
Dysbiosis
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation*
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Humans
Microbiota
Recurrence
Ulcer*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Colonoscopic images before fecal microbiota transplantation. (A) Descending A B colon and (B) sigmoid colon.

  • Fig. 2 The clinical course of the patient. C. difficile, Clostridium difficile; FMT, fecal microbiota transplantation.

  • Fig. 3 PCR ribotyping patterns of Clostridium difficile isolated from the present patient and 4 ribotype strains (toxin A-positive, toxin B-positive, and binary toxin-negative) endemic in Japan. Lane M, molecular size marker (100 bp ladder); lane 1, C. difficile isolated from the present patient; lane 2, PCR-ribotype 001; lane 3, PCR-ribotype 002; lane 4, PCR-ribotype 014; lane 5, PCR-ribotype 018.

  • Fig. 4 Composition and diversity of the gut microbiome. (A) Phylum level taxonomic profiles of the donor and recipient, before and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). (B) Microbiota diversity (Shannon index, circle) and total number of operational taxonomic unit (OTUs, bar) of the donor and recipient, before and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after FMT.


Cited by  1 articles

Management of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Sahil Khanna
Intest Res. 2021;19(3):265-274.    doi: 10.5217/ir.2020.00045.


Reference

1. Sinh P, Barrett TA, Yun L. Clostridium difficile infection and inflammatory bowel disease: a review. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2011; 2011:136064. PMID: 21915178.
2. van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:407–415. PMID: 23323867.
Article
3. Brandt LJ. American Journal of Gastroenterology Lecture: intestinal microbiota and the role of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in treatment of C. difficile infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108:177–185. PMID: 23318479.
Article
4. Surawicz CM, Brandt LJ, Binion DG, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108:478–498. PMID: 23439232.
Article
5. Debast SB, Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014; 20(Suppl 2):1–26.
Article
6. Lessa FC, Mu Y, Bamberg WM, et al. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:825–834. PMID: 25714160.
Article
7. Tanaka T, Kato H, Fujimoto T. Successful fecal microbiota trans-plantation as an initial therapy for Clostridium difficile infection on an outpatient basis. Intern Med. 2016; 55:999–1000. PMID: 27086820.
Article
8. Matsuoka K, Mizuno S, Hayashi A, Hisamatsu T, Naganuma M, Kanai T. Fecal microbiota transplantation for gastrointestinal diseases. Keio J Med. 2014; 63:69–74. PMID: 25500625.
Article
9. Brace C, Gloor GB, Ropeleski M, Allen-Vercoe E, Petrof EO. Microbial composition analysis of Clostridium difficile infections in an ulcerative colitis patient treated with multiple fecal microbiota transplantations. J Crohns Colitis. 2014; 8:1133–1137. PMID: 24529606.
Article
10. Kato H, Kato N, Watanabe K, et al. Identification of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36:2178–2182. PMID: 9665986.
Article
11. Kim SW, Suda W, Kim S, et al. Robustness of gut microbiota of healthy adults in response to probiotic intervention revealed by high-throughput pyrosequencing. DNA Res. 2013; 20:241–253. PMID: 23571675.
Article
12. Lawley TD, Clare S, Walker AW, et al. Targeted restoration of the intestinal microbiota with a simple, defined bacteriotherapy resolves relapsing Clostridium difficile disease in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2012; 8:e1002995. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002995. PMID: 23133377.
Article
13. Mulherin DW, Hutchison AM, Thomas GJ, Hansen RA, Childress DT. Concordance of the SHEA-IDSA severity classification for Clostridium difficile infection and the ATLAS bedside scoring system in hospitalized adult patients. Infection. 2014; 42:999–1005. PMID: 25129565.
Article
14. Khanna S, Shin A, Kelly CP. Management of Clostridium difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: expert review from the clinical practice updates committee of the AGA institute. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15:166–174. PMID: 28093134.
Article
15. Issa M, Vijayapal A, Graham MB, et al. Impact of Clostridium difficile on inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 5:345–351. PMID: 17368234.
Article
16. Kassam Z, Lee CH, Yuan Y, Hunt RH. Fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108:500–508. PMID: 23511459.
Article
17. Frank DN, St Amand AL, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Pace NR. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104:13780–13785. PMID: 17699621.
Article
18. Garrett WS, Lord GM, Punit S, et al. Communicable ulcerative colitis induced by T-bet deficiency in the innate immune system. Cell. 2007; 131:33–45. PMID: 17923086.
Article
19. Rossen NG, Fuentes S, van der, et al. Findings from a randomized controlled trial of fecal transplantation for patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2015; 149:110–118.e4. PMID: 25836986.
Article
20. Moayyedi P, Surette MG, Kim PT, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation induces remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis in a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2015; 149:102–109.e6. PMID: 25857665.
Article
Full Text Links
  • IR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr