J Breast Cancer.  2011 Sep;14(3):175-180.

Can CD44+/CD24- Tumor Cells Be Used to Determine the Extent of Breast Cancer Invasion Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Affiliations
  • 1The Second Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
  • 2The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. angel-s205@163.com
  • 3Jilin Medical College, Changchun, China.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To investigate the distribution of CD44+/CD24- cells in breast cancers in relation to tumor size before and after the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS
CD44+/CD24- tumor cells obtained from breast cancer specimens were characterized in vivo and in vitro using tumor formation assays and mammosphere generation assays, respectively. The distribution of CD44+/CD24- tumor cells in 78 breast cancer specimens following administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was also evaluated using immunofluorescence assays, and this distribution was compared with the extent of tumor invasion predicted by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST).
RESULTS
In 27/78 cases, complete remission (CR) was identified using RECIST. However, 18 of these CR cases were associated with a scattered distribution of tumor stem cells in the outline of the original tumor prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 24 cases involved cancer cells that were confined to the tumor outline, and 21 cases had tumor cells or tumor stem cells overlapping the tumor outline. In addition, there were 6 patients who were insensitive to chemotherapy, and in these cases, both cancer cells and stem cells were detected outside the contours of the tumor volume imaged prior to chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION
CD44+/CD24- tumor cells may be an additional parameter to evaluate when determining the extent of breast cancer invasion.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Neoplasm invasion; Stem cells

MeSH Terms

Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Humans
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplastic Stem Cells
Stem Cells
Tumor Burden

Figure

  • Figure 1 CD44+/CD24- cells (5×103) were combined with Matrigel and injected into the mammary fat pad of NOD/SCID mice. An example of a successfully established solid tumor is indicated with an arrow.

  • Figure 2 CD44+/CD24- cells were observed to form mammospheres one week after being cultured in serum-free medium (A: ×20), while control cells did not (B: ×20).

  • Figure 3 Various distributions of stem cells were observed following the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For example, few CD44+/CD24- tumor cells were observed in specimens from case no. 17 (A: ×10), while CD44+/CD24- tumor cells were observed to be distributed at the edge of the tumor in case no. 4 (B: ×10). Staining was performed with: mouse anti-human CD44 antibody and APC conjugated secondary (1); rabbit anti-human CD24 antibody with FITC conjugated secondary (2), and DAPI for the detection of nuclei (3). An overlay of panels (1), (2), and (3) is presented in (4).

  • Figure 4 Proposed tumor invasion classification criteria. Turquoise and magenta regions represent the tumor size identified before and after chemotherapy, respectively, while the red and blue circles represent the distribution of CD44+/CD24- and non-CD44+/CD24- tumor cells, respectively, associated with each type of tumor invasion.

  • Figure 5 For case no.12, tumor stem cells were observed to localize to the outline of the tumor following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (A: ×10). For case no. 25, cancer stem cells were detected in the vascular system of paracancerous tissues (B: ×10) and this was consistent with the results of immunofluorescence assays.


Reference

1. Lyall D, Schwartz M, Herter FP, Hudson PB, Wright JC, Findlay CW, et al. Treatment of cancer by the method of Revici. JAMA. 1965. 194:279–280.
Article
2. Chong HY, Taib NA, Rampal S, Saad M, Bustam AZ, Yip CH. Treatment options for locally advanced breast cancer--experience in an Asian tertiary hospital. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010. 11:913–917.
3. Siponen ET, Vaalavirta L, Joensuu H, Vironen J, Heikkilä P, Leidenius MH. Ipsilateral breast recurrence after breast conserving surgery in patients with small (≤ 2 cm) breast cancer treated with modern adjuvant therapies. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011. 37:25–31.
Article
4. Smith BD, Buchholz TA, Kuerer HM. Intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Lancet. 2010. 376:1141.
Article
5. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009. 45:228–247.
Article
6. Linton KM, Taylor MB, Radford JA. Response evaluation in gastrointestinal stromal tumours treated with imatinib: misdiagnosis of disease progression on CT due to cystic change in liver metastases. Br J Radiol. 2006. 79:e40–e44.
Article
7. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003. 100:3983–3988.
Article
8. Pece S, Tosoni D, Confalonieri S, Mazzarol G, Vecchi M, Ronzoni S, et al. Biological and molecular heterogeneity of breast cancers correlates with their cancer stem cell content. Cell. 2010. 140:62–73.
Article
9. Tanei T, Morimoto K, Shimazu K, Kim SJ, Tanji Y, Taguchi T, et al. Association of breast cancer stem cells identified by aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression with resistance to sequential paclitaxel and epirubicin-based chemotherapy for breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2009. 15:4234–4241.
Article
10. Liu S, Wicha MS. Targeting breast cancer stem cells. J Clin Oncol. 2010. 28:4006–4012.
Article
11. Yi M, Buchholz TA, Meric-Bernstam F, Bedrosian I, Hwang RF, Ross MI, et al. Classification of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast conservation therapy can predict patient prognosis and facilitate treatment planning. Ann Surg. 2011. 253:572–579.
Article
12. Shin HJ, Kim HH, Ahn JH, Kim SB, Jung KH, Gong G, et al. Comparison of mammography, sonography, MRI and clinical examination in patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Radiol. 2011. 84:612–620.
Article
13. Nakshatri H. Radiation resistance in breast cancer: are CD44+/CD24-/proteosome low/PKH26+ cells to blame? Breast Cancer Res. 2010. 12:105.
14. Oliveira LR, Jeffrey SS, Ribeiro-Silva A. Stem cells in human breast cancer. Histol Histopathol. 2010. 25:371–385.
15. Kakarala M, Wicha MS. Implications of the cancer stem-cell hypothesis for breast cancer prevention and therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008. 26:2813–2820.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr