Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.  2015 Jun;48(3):164-173. 10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.3.164.

Clinical Results of Different Myocardial Protection Techniques in Aortic Stenosis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Korea. pwpark@skku.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Hypertrophied myocardium is especially vulnerable to ischemic injury. This study aimed to compare the early and late clinical outcomes of three different methods of myocardial protection in patients with aortic stenosis.
METHODS
This retrospective study included 225 consecutive patients (mean age, 65+/-10 years; 123 males) with severe aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement. Patients were excluded if they had coronary artery disease, an ejection fraction <50%, more than mild aortic regurgitation, or endocarditis. The patients were divided into three groups: group A, which was treated with antegrade and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia; group B, which was treated with antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia using histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution; and group C, treated with retrograde cold blood cardioplegia.
RESULTS
Group A contained 70 patients (31.1%), group B contained 74 patients (32.9%), and group C contained 81 patients (36%). The three groups showed significant differences with regard to the proportion of patients with a New York Heart Association functional classification > or =III (p=0.035), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels (p=0.042), ejection fraction (p=0.035), left ventricular dimensions (p<0.001), left ventricular mass index (p<0.001), and right ventricular systolic pressure (p<0.001). Differences in cardiopulmonary bypass time (p=0.532) and aortic cross-clamp time (p=0.48) among the three groups were not statistically significant. During postoperative recovery, no significant differences were found regarding the use of inotropes (p=0.328), mechanical support (n=0), arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, p=0.347; non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, p=0.1), and ventilator support time (p=0.162). No operative mortality occurred. Similarly, no significant differences were found in long-term outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Although the three groups showed some significant differences with regard to patient characteristics, both antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia with HTK solution and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia led to early and late clinical results similar to those achieved with combined antegrade and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia.

Keyword

Aortic valve; Replacement; Myocardial reperfusion injury; Cardioplegic solutions; Retrograde

MeSH Terms

Aortic Valve
Aortic Valve Insufficiency
Aortic Valve Stenosis*
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Blood Pressure
Cardioplegic Solutions
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Classification
Coronary Artery Disease
Endocarditis
Heart
Heart Arrest, Induced
Humans
Mortality
Myocardial Reperfusion Injury
Myocardium
Retrospective Studies
Tachycardia, Ventricular
Ventilators, Mechanical
Cardioplegic Solutions
Full Text Links
  • KJTCS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr