Clin Exp Vaccine Res.  2017 Jan;6(1):15-21. 10.7774/cevr.2017.6.1.15.

The development of mucosal vaccines for both mucosal and systemic immune induction and the roles played by adjuvants

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Molecular Biology and Institute for Molecular Biology and Genetics, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea. yongsuk@jbnu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Bioactive Material Sciences and Research Center of Bioactive Materials, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.

Abstract

Vaccination is the most successful immunological practice that improves the quality of human life and health. Vaccine materials include antigens of pathogens and adjuvants potentiating the effectiveness of vaccination. Vaccines are categorized using various criteria, including the vaccination material used and the method of administration. Traditionally, vaccines have been injected via needles. However, given that most pathogens first infect mucosal surfaces, there is increasing interest in the establishment of protective mucosal immunity, achieved by vaccination via mucosal routes. This review summarizes recent developments in mucosal vaccines and their associated adjuvants.

Keyword

Adjuvants; Mucosal immunity; Vaccines

MeSH Terms

Humans
Immunity, Mucosal
Methods
Needles
Vaccination
Vaccines*
Vaccines

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of mucosal immune induction. The luminal antigens transcytosed by M cells encounter dendritic cells (DCs) in the subepithelial dome of Peyer's patch. DCs loaded with the antigens move into the interfollicular T cell zone and induce the effector T cells. Antigen-specific effector CD4+ T cells expressing CD40 ligand induce the IgA+ plasmablasts. FDC, follicular dendritic cell; TCR, T-cell receptor; TGF β, transforming growth factor β; IL, interleukin; AID, activation-induced cytidine deaminase; CSR, class switch recombination; CXCL13, CXC chemokine ligand 13; CXCR5, CXC chemokine receptor 5.

  • Fig. 2 The role played by secretory antibodies in the mucosal compartment. Secreted antibodies can protect mucosal surfaces by immune exclusion, antigen excretion, and intracellular neutralization. Immune exclusion is that secretory IgA (SIgA) interact with antigens and block their attachment to epithelial cells. The SIgAs bind to antigen and remove from the lamina propria through antigen excretion. The intracellular pathogen can also be eliminated by intracellular neutralization.

  • Fig. 3 Mucosal immunization routes and the regions affected. The mucosal IgA responses are differentially induced according to the routes of mucosal immunization. Oral vaccination is effective for the immune induction in the gastrointestinal tract, salivary glands, and mammary glands. Intranasal vaccination is effective for the immune induction in respiratory, gastric and genital tracts.


Reference

1. Rappuoli R, Mandl CW, Black S, De Gregorio E. Vaccines for the twenty-first century society. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011; 11:865–872.
Article
2. Kwok R. Vaccines: the real issues in vaccine safety. Nature. 2011; 473:436–438.
Article
3. Gutjahr A, Tiraby G, Perouzel E, Verrier B, Paul S. Triggering intracellular receptors for vaccine adjuvantation. Trends Immunol. 2016; 37:573–587.
Article
4. Bachmann MF, Jennings GT. Vaccine delivery: a matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010; 10:787–796.
Article
5. McGhee JR, Fujihashi K. Inside the mucosal immune system. PLoS Biol. 2012; 10:e1001397.
Article
6. Brandtzaeg P, Kiyono H, Pabst R, Russell MW. Terminology: nomenclature of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. Mucosal Immunol. 2008; 1:31–37.
Article
7. Corr SC, Gahan CC, Hill C. M-cells: origin, morphology and role in mucosal immunity and microbial pathogenesis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008; 52:2–12.
Article
8. Ohno H. Intestinal M cells. J Biochem. 2016; 159:151–160.
Article
9. Schulz O, Pabst O. Antigen sampling in the small intestine. Trends Immunol. 2013; 34:155–161.
Article
10. Cerutti A, Chen K, Chorny A. Immunoglobulin responses at the mucosal interface. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011; 29:273–293.
Article
11. Bemark M, Boysen P, Lycke NY. Induction of gut IgA production through T cell-dependent and T cell-independent pathways. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012; 1247:97–116.
Article
12. Pabst O. New concepts in the generation and functions of IgA. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012; 12:821–832.
Article
13. Strugnell RA, Wijburg OL. The role of secretory antibodies in infection immunity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010; 8:656–667.
Article
14. Lycke N. Recent progress in mucosal vaccine development: potential and limitations. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012; 12:592–605.
Article
15. Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A, Araki K, Ahmed R. From vaccines to memory and back. Immunity. 2010; 33:451–463.
Article
16. Kim SH, Jang YS. Antigen targeting to M cells for enhancing the efficacy of mucosal vaccines. Exp Mol Med. 2014; 46:e85.
Article
17. Pedersen G, Cox R. The mucosal vaccine quandary: intranasal vs. sublingual immunization against influenza. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012; 8:689–693.
Article
18. Lamichhane A, Azegamia T, Kiyonoa H. The mucosal immune system for vaccine development. Vaccine. 2014; 32:6711–6723.
Article
19. Mabbott NA, Donaldson DS, Ohno H, Williams IR, Mahajan A. Microfold (M) cells: important immunosurveillance posts in the intestinal epithelium. Mucosal Immunol. 2013; 6:666–677.
Article
20. Clark MA, Jepson MA, Simmons NL, Hirst BH. Differential surface characteristics of M cells from mouse intestinal Peyer’s and caecal patches. Histochem J. 1994; 26:271–280.
Article
21. Foster N, Clark MA, Jepson MA, Hirst BH. Ulex europaeus 1 lectin targets microspheres to mouse Peyer's patch M-cells in vivo. Vaccine. 1998; 16:536–541.
Article
22. Hirabayashi J, Hashidate T, Arata Y, et al. Oligosaccharide specificity of galectins: a search by frontal affinity chromatography. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002; 1572:232–254.
Article
23. Kim SH, Jung DI, Yang IY, et al. M cells expressing the complement C5a receptor are efficient targets for mucosal vaccine delivery. Eur J Immunol. 2011; 41:3219–3229.
Article
24. Kim SH, Lee HY, Jang YS. Expression of the ATP-gated P2X7 receptor on M cells and its modulating role in the mucosal immune environment. Immune Netw. 2015; 15:44–49.
Article
25. Kim SH, Yang IY, Kim J, Lee KY, Jang YS. Antimicrobial peptide LL-37 promotes antigen-specific immune responses in mice by enhancing Th17-skewed mucosal and systemic immunities. Eur J Immunol. 2015; 45:1402–1413.
Article
26. Clark MA, Hirst BH, Jepson MA. M-cell surface beta1 integrin expression and invasin-mediated targeting of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis to mouse Peyer's patch M cells. Infect Immun. 1998; 66:1237–1243.
Article
27. Hase K, Kawano K, Nochi T, et al. Uptake through glycoprotein 2 of FimH(+) bacteria by M cells initiates mucosal immune response. Nature. 2009; 462:226–230.
Article
28. Keely S, Glover LE, Weissmueller T, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-dependent regulation of platelet-activating factor receptor as a route for gram-positive bacterial translocation across epithelia. Mol Biol Cell. 2010; 21:538–546.
Article
29. Kunisawa J, Kurashima Y, Kiyono H. Gut-associated lymphoid tissues for the development of oral vaccines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012; 64:523–530.
Article
30. Kyd JM, Cripps AW. Functional differences between M cells and enterocytes in sampling luminal antigens. Vaccine. 2008; 26:6221–6224.
31. Lo DD, Ling J, Eckelhoefer AH. M cell targeting by a Claudin 4 targeting peptide can enhance mucosal IgA responses. BMC Biotechnol. 2012; 12:7.
32. Nakato G, Hase K, Suzuki M, et al. Cutting Edge: Brucella abortus exploits a cellular prion protein on intestinal M cells as an invasive receptor. J Immunol. 2012; 189:1540–1544.
Article
33. Nochi T, Yuki Y, Matsumura A, et al. A novel M cell-specific carbohydrate-targeted mucosal vaccine effectively induces antigen-specific immune responses. J Exp Med. 2007; 204:2789–2796.
Article
34. Osanai A, Sashinami H, Asano K, Li SJ, Hu DL, Nakane A. Mouse peptidoglycan recognition protein PGLYRP-1 plays a role in the host innate immune response against Listeria monocytogenes infection. Infect Immun. 2011; 79:858–866.
Article
35. Rand JH, Wu XX, Lin EY, Griffel A, Gialanella P, McKitrick JC. Annexin A5 binds to lipopolysaccharide and reduces its endotoxin activity. MBio. 2012; 3:pii: e00292-11.
Article
36. Sato S, Kaneto S, Shibata N, et al. Transcription factor Spi-B-dependent and -independent pathways for the development of Peyer's patch M cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2013; 6:838–846.
Article
37. Shafique M, Wilschut J, de Haan A. Induction of mucosal and systemic immunity against respiratory syncytial virus by inactivated virus supplemented with TLR9 and NOD2 ligands. Vaccine. 2012; 30:597–606.
Article
38. Tyrer P, Foxwell AR, Cripps AW, Apicella MA, Kyd JM. Microbial pattern recognition receptors mediate M-cell uptake of a gram-negative bacterium. Infect Immun. 2006; 74:625–631.
Article
39. Wolf JL, Kauffman RS, Finberg R, Dambrauskas R, Fields BN, Trier JS. Determinants of reovirus interaction with the intestinal M cells and absorptive cells of murine intestine. Gastroenterology. 1983; 85:291–300.
Article
40. Kim SH, Seo KW, Kim J, Lee KY, Jang YS. The M cell-targeting ligand promotes antigen delivery and induces antigen-specific immune responses in mucosal vaccination. J Immunol. 2010; 185:5787–5795.
Article
41. Agren LC, Ekman L, Lowenadler B, Lycke NY. Genetically engineered nontoxic vaccine adjuvant that combines B cell targeting with immunomodulation by cholera toxin A1 subunit. J Immunol. 1997; 158:3936–3946.
Article
42. Chen K, Cerutti A. Vaccination strategies to promote mucosal antibody responses. Immunity. 2010; 33:479–491.
Article
43. Christensen D, Agger EM, Andreasen LV, Kirby D, Andersen P, Perrie Y. Liposome-based cationic adjuvant formulations (CAF): past, present, and future. J Liposome Res. 2009; 19:2–11.
Article
44. Eliasson DG, Helgeby A, Schon K, et al. A novel non-toxic combined CTA1-DD and ISCOMS adjuvant vector for effective mucosal immunization against influenza virus. Vaccine. 2011; 29:3951–3961.
Article
45. Manicassamy S, Pulendran B. Modulation of adaptive immunity with Toll-like receptors. Semin Immunol. 2009; 21:185–193.
Article
46. Thompson AL, Johnson BT, Sempowski GD, et al. Maximal adjuvant activity of nasally delivered IL-1alpha requires adjuvant-responsive CD11c(+) cells and does not correlate with adjuvant-induced in vivo cytokine production. J Immunol. 2012; 188:2834–2846.
Article
47. Uematsu S, Fujimoto K, Jang MH, et al. Regulation of humoral and cellular gut immunity by lamina propria dendritic cells expressing Toll-like receptor 5. Nat Immunol. 2008; 9:769–776.
Article
48. van der Lubben IM, Verhoef JC, Borchard G, Junginger HE. Chitosan for mucosal vaccination. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001; 52:139–144.
Article
49. Winstone N, Wilson AJ, Morrow G, et al. Enhanced control of pathogenic Simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239 replication in macaques immunized with an interleukin-12 plasmid and a DNA prime-viral vector boost vaccine regimen. J Virol. 2011; 85:9578–9587.
Article
50. Agren L, Sverremark E, Ekman L, et al. The ADP-ribosylating CTA1-DD adjuvant enhances T cell-dependent and independent responses by direct action on B cells involving anti-apoptotic Bcl-2- and germinal center-promoting effects. J Immunol. 2000; 164:6276–6286.
Article
51. Mastelic Gavillet B, Eberhardt CS, Auderset F, et al. MF59 Mediates Its B Cell Adjuvanticity by Promoting T Follicular Helper Cells and Thus Germinal Center Responses in Adult and Early Life. J Immunol. 2015; 194:4836–4845.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEVR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr