Tuberc Respir Dis.  2016 Oct;79(4):282-288. 10.4046/trd.2016.79.4.282.

Performance of the BacT Alert 3D System Versus Solid Media for Recovery and Drug Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a Tertiary Hospital in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Microbiology, Institute for Immunology and Immunological Disease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea. bojeon@yonsei.ac.kr
  • 3Food & Drug Administration, Cheongju, Korea.
  • 4National Masan Tuberculosis Hospital, Changwon, Korea.
  • 5International Tuberculosis Research Center, Masan, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Tuberculosis (TB) is a major health problem, and accurate and rapid diagnosis of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extended drug-resistant (XDR) TB is important for appropriate treatment. In this study, performances of solid and liquid culture methods were compared with respect to MDR- and XDR-TB isolate recovery and drug susceptibility testing.
METHODS
Sputum specimens from 304 patients were stained with Ziehl-Neelsen method. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) isolates were tested for recovery on Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium and the BacT Alert 3D system. For drug susceptibility testing of Mtb, isolates were evaluated on M-KIT plates and the BacT Alert 3D system.
RESULTS
The recovery rates were 94.9% (206/217) and 98.2% (213/217) for LJ medium and the BacT Alert 3D system, respectively (kappa coefficient, 0.884). The rate of drug resistance was 13.4% for at least one or more drugs, 6.0% for MDR-TB and 2.3% for XDR-TB. M-KIT plate and BacT 3D Alert 3D system were comparable in drug susceptibility testing for isoniazid (97.7%; kappa coefficient, 0.905) and rifampin (98.6%; kappa coefficient, 0.907). Antibiotic resistance was observed using M-KIT plates for 24 of the total 29 Mtb isolates (82.8%).
CONCLUSION
The liquid culture system showed greater reduction in the culture period, as compared with LJ medium; however, drug susceptibility testing using M-KIT plates was advantageous for simultaneous testing against multiple drug targets.

Keyword

Tuberculosis; Drug Susceptibility; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Tertiary Care Center; Korea

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis
Drug Resistance
Drug Resistance, Microbial
Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis
Humans
Isoniazid
Korea*
Methods
Mycobacterium tuberculosis*
Mycobacterium*
Rifampin
Sputum
Tertiary Care Centers*
Tuberculosis
Isoniazid
Rifampin

Reference

1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2013. Geneva: World Health Organization;2013.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: United States, 1993-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007; 56:250–253.
3. Gandhi NR, Moll A, Sturm AW, Pawinski R, Govender T, Lalloo U, et al. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. Lancet. 2006; 368:1575–1580.
4. Skrahina A, Hurevich H, Zalutskaya A, Sahalchyk E, Astrauko A, Hoffner S, et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Belarus: the size of the problem and associated risk factors. Bull World Health Organ. 2013; 91:36–45.
5. Steingart KR, Ng V, Henry M, Hopewell PC, Ramsay A, Cunningham J, et al. Sputum processing methods to improve the sensitivity of smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006; 6:664–674.
6. Cattamanchi A, Davis JL, Pai M, Huang L, Hopewell PC, Steingart KR. Does bleach processing increase the accuracy of sputum smear microscopy for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis? J Clin Microbiol. 2010; 48:2433–2439.
7. Wright A, Zignol M, Van Deun A, Falzon D, Gerdes SR, Feldman K, et al. Epidemiology of antituberculosis drug resistance 2002-07: an updated analysis of the Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance. Lancet. 2009; 373:1861–1873.
8. Schaberg T, Reichert B, Schulin T, Lode H, Mauch H. Rapid drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using conventional solid media. Eur Respir J. 1995; 8:1688–1693.
9. Cruciani M, Scarparo C, Malena M, Bosco O, Serpelloni G, Mengoli C. Meta-analysis of BACTEC MGIT 960 and BACTEC 460 TB, with or without solid media, for detection of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42:2321–2325.
10. World Health Organization. Use of liquid TB culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) in low and medium income settings. Summary report of the Expert Group Meeting on the Use of Liquid Culture Media. Geneva: World Health Organization;2007.
11. O'Grady J, Maeurer M, Mwaba P, Kapata N, Bates M, Hoelscher M, et al. New and improved diagnostics for detection of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011; 17:134–141.
12. Choi JC, Lim SY, Suh GY, Chung MP, Kim H, Kwon OJ, et al. Drug resistance rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis at a private referral center in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2007; 22:677–681.
13. Diagnostic Standards and Classification of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. This statement was endorsed by the Council of the Infectious Disease Society of America, September 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161(4 Pt 1):1376–1395.
14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Suceptibility testing of mycobacteria, Norcardiae, and other aerobic Actinomycetes: approved standard. CLIS document M24-A. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;2003.
15. Bang H, Park S, Hwang J, Jin H, Cho E, Kim DY, et al. Improved rapid molecular diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis using a new reverse hybridization assay, REBA MTB-MDR. J Med Microbiol. 2011; 60(Pt 10):1447–1454.
16. Bai GH, Park YK, Choi YW, Bai JI, Kim HJ, Chang CL, et al. Trend of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in Korea, 1994-2004. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007; 11:571–576.
17. Hanna BA, Ebrahimzadeh A, Elliott LB, Morgan MA, Novak SM, Rusch-Gerdes S, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system for recovery of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37:748–752.
18. Srisuwanvilai LO, Monkongdee P, Podewils LJ, Ngamlert K, Pobkeeree V, Puripokai P, et al. Performance of the BACTEC MGIT 960 compared with solid media for detection of Mycobacterium in Bangkok, Thailand. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 61:402–407.
19. Idigoras P, Beristain X, Iturzaeta A, Vicente D, Perez-Trallero E. Comparison of the automated nonradiometric Bactec MGIT 960 system with Lowenstein-Jensen, Coletsos, and Middlebrook 7H11 solid media for recovery of mycobacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000; 19:350–354.
20. Lee JJ, Suo J, Lin CB, Wang JD, Lin TY, Tsai YC. Comparative evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system with solid medium for isolation of mycobacteria. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003; 7:569–574.
21. Koh WJ, Ko Y, Kim CK, Park KS, Lee NY. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance using a MGIT 960 system. Ann Lab Med. 2012; 32:264–269.
22. Espasa M, Salvado M, Vicente E, Tudo G, Alcaide F, Coll P, et al. Evaluation of the VersaTREK system compared to the Bactec MGIT 960 system for first-line drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50:488–491.
Full Text Links
  • TRD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr