J Bacteriol Virol.  2016 Sep;46(3):159-166. 10.4167/jbv.2016.46.3.159.

Antiviral Activity of Corylus heterophylla Fisch Against Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Beauty Science, Kwangju Women's University, Gwangju, Korea. rerived@kwu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Health Administration, Kwangju Women's University, Gwangju, Korea.
  • 3Natural Medicine Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology, Cheong-ju, Chungbuk, Korea.
  • 4Department of Clinical Pathology, Daejeon Health Sciences College, Daejeon, Korea. artemis3993@gmail.com

Abstract

The porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has recently been shown to cause huge economic losses in the global pork industry. Our results demonstrated that the extract dose-dependently inhibited the replication of PEDV and reduced the visible cytopathic effect (CPE). Treatment with C. heterophylla Fisch extract resulted in marked reduction of PEDVinduced cytokine and chemokine expression. The antiviral activity of C. heterophylla Fisch extract on PEDV replication was found to be primarily exerted at the early stages after infection. Taken together, our data indicate that C. heterophylla Fisch extract may be a good therapeutic agent for use against PEDV and also a potential candidate to be evaluated against other human and animal coronaviruses.

Keyword

Corylus heterophylla Fisch; Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV); Antiviral activity

MeSH Terms

Animals
Coronavirus
Corylus*
Humans
Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus*
Red Meat

Figure

  • Figure 1. The effects of C. heterophylla Fisch extract on PEDV-induced CPE. Morphological assessment of PEDV-infected Vero cells following treatment with C. heterophylla Fisch extract. (A) Non-infected cells; (B) non-infected cells treated with C. heterophylla Fisch extract 10 μg/ml; (C) non-infected cells treated with C. heterophylla Fisch extract 50 μg/ml; (D) PEDV-infected cells; (E) PEDV-infected cells treated with C. heterophylla Fisch extract 10 μg/ml; (F) PEDV-infected cells treated with C. heterophylla Fisch extract 50 μg/ml.

  • Figure 2. The antiviral activity of C. heterophylla Fisch against PEDV. (A) Antiviral activity and (B) Cytotoxicity of C. heterophylla Fisch extract against PEDV in Vero cells. Vero cells were infected with PEDV, after which they were treated with the indicated concentrations (0.4, 2, 10, and 50 μg/ml) of C. heterophylla Fisch extract for 48 h. Antiviral activity was investigated using a CPE reduction assay. Data are presented as means ± S.D. from three independent experiments, each carried out in triplicate. ∗∗∗ p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test)

  • Figure 3. Cytokine and chemokine gene expression levels reduced by C. heterophylla Fisch extract in Vero cells. Proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines measured in PEDV-infected Vero cells treated with C. heterophylla Fisch extract 6 h after infection.

  • Figure 4. Time-of-addition effect of C. heterophylla Fisch on PEDV replication in Vero cells. C. heterophylla Fisch extract at 10 μg/ml was added either before (-1 h), during (0 h), or after (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h) PEDV infection. After 2 d, inhibition was evaluated using the SRB method and was expressed as the inhibition rate. Each value is the result of mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.


Reference

1). Wood EN. An apparently new syndrome of porcine epidemic diarrhoea. Vet Rec. 1977; 100:243–4.
Article
2). Temeeyasen G, Srijangwad A, Tripipat T, Tipsombatboon P, Piriyapongsa J, Phoolcharoen W, et al. Genetic diversity of ORF3 and spike genes of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in Thailand. Infect Genet Evol. 2014; 21:205–13.
Article
3). Sun D, Wang X, Wei S, Chen J, Feng L. Epidemiology and vaccine of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in China: a mini-review. J Vet Med Sci. 2016; 78:355–63.
Article
4). Jung K, Saif LJ. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection: Etiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis and immunoprophylaxis. Vet J. 2015; 204:134–43.
Article
5). Gerber PF, Opriessnig T. Detection of immunoglobulin (Ig) A antibodies against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) in fecal and serum samples. MethodsX. 2015; 2:368–73.
Article
6). Kweon CH, Kwon BJ, Lee JG, Kwon GO, Kang YB. Derivation of attenuated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) as vaccine candidate. Vaccine. 1999; 17:2546–53.
Article
7). Song DS, Yang JS, Oh JS, Han JH, Park BK. Differentiation of a Vero cell adapted porcine epidemic diarrhea virus from Korean field strains by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of ORF 3. Vaccine. 2003; 21:1833–42.
Article
8). Shen H, Zhang C, Guo P, Liu Z, Zhang J. Effective inhibition of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus by RNA interference in vitro. Virus Genes. 2015; 51:252–9.
9). Järvinen P, Palmé A, Orlando Morales L, Lännenpää M, Keinänen M, Sopanen T, et al. Phylogenetic relationships of Betula species (Betulaceae) based on nuclear ADH and chloroplast matK sequences. Am J Bot. 2004; 91:1834–45.
10). Zhao TT, Zhang J, Liang LS, Ma QH, Chen X, Zong JW, et al. Expression and Functional Analysis of WRKY Transcription Factors in Chinese Wild Hazel, Corylus heterophylla Fisch. PloS One. 2015; 10:e0135315.
11). Plosker GL, Hurst M. Paclitaxel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in non-small cell lung cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001; 19:1111–34.
12). Kumar S, Mahdi H, Bryant C, Shah JP, Garg G, Munkarah A. Clinical trials and progress with paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. Int J Womens Health. 2010; 2:411–27.
Article
13). Gradishar WJ. Taxanes for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2012; 6:159–71.
Article
14). Choi HJ, Kim JH, Lee CH, Ahn YJ, Song JH, Baek SH, et al. Antiviral activity of quercetin 7-rhamnoside against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Antiviral Res. 2009; 81:77–81.
Article
15). Chiang LC, Chiang W, Liu MC, Lin CC. In vitro antiviral activities of Caesalpinia pulcherrima and its related flavonoids. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003; 52:194–8.
16). Briskin DP. Medicinal plants and phytomedicines. Linking plant biochemistry and physiology to human health. Plant Physiol. 2000; 124:507–14.
Article
17). Jassim SA, Naji MA. Novel antiviral agents: a medicinal plant perspective. J Appl Microbiol. 2003; 95:412–27.
Article
18). Vlietinck AJ, Vanden Berghe DA. Can ethnopharmacology contribute to the development of antiviral drugs? J Ethnopharmacol. 1991; 32:141–53.
Article
19). Mukhtar M, Arshad M, Ahmad M, Pomerantz RJ, Wigdahl B, Parveen Z. Antiviral potentials of medicinal plants. Virus Res. 2008; 131:111–20.
Article
20). Li Y, Jiang R, Ooi LS, But PP, Ooi VE. Antiviral triterpenoids from the medicinal plant Schefflera heptaphylla. Phytother Res. 2007; 21:466–70.
21). del Barrio G, Parra F. Evaluation of the antiviral activity of an aqueous extract from Phyllanthus orbicularis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000; 72:317–22.
Article
22). Opitz B, van Laak V, Eitel J, Suttorp N. Innate immune recognition in infectious and noninfectious diseases of the lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 181:1294–309.
Article
23). Gazit R, Gruda R, Elboim M, Arnon TI, Katz G, Achdout H, et al. Lethal influenza infection in the absence of the natural killer cell receptor gene Ncr1. Nat Immunol. 2006; 7:517–23.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBV
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr