J Korean Dent Soc Anesthesiol.  2014 Dec;14(4):213-219. 10.17245/jkdsa.2014.14.4.213.

Comparison of Efficacy of Propofol When Used with or without Remifentanil during Conscious Sedation with a Target-Controlled Infuser for Impacted Teeth Extraction

• Sung J
• Kim HJ
• Choi YJ
• Lee SE
• Seo KS

• KMID: 2344981
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.17245/jkdsa.2014.14.4.213

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Clinical use of propofol along with remifentanil for intravenous sedation is increasing in these days, but there are not enough researches to evaluate proper target concentration when these drugs are infused by using target controlled infusion (TCI) pump in dental treatment cases. In this study, we compared efficacy of TCI conscious sedation and target concentration of propofol when it used with or without remifentanil during conscious sedation with the help of a TCI for the surgical extraction of impacted teeth.
METHODS
After IRB approval, all the charts of patients who had undergone surgical extraction of impacted teeth under propofol TCI sedation for 6 months were selected and reviewed for this study. After reviewal of charts, we could divide patients in two groups. In one group (group 1), only propofol was selected for sedation and initial effect site concentration of propofol was 1 µg/ml (n = 33), and in another group (group 2), both propofol and remifentanil was infused and initial effect site concentration of each drug was 0.6 µg/ml and 1 ng/ml respectively (n = 25). For each group, average propofol target concentration was measured. In addition, we compared heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as oxygen saturation. Besides, BIS, sedation scores (OAAS/S), and subjective satisfaction scores were compared.
RESULTS
Between group 1 and 2, there were no significant differences in demographics (age, weight and height), and total sedation time. However, total infused dose and the effect site target concentration of propofol was 163.8 ± 74.5 mg and 1.13 ± 0.21 µg/ml in group 1, and 104.3 ± 46.5 mg and 0.72 ± 0.26 µg/ml in the group 2 with 1.02 ± 0.21 ng/ml of the effect site target concentration of remifentanil, respectively. During sedation, there were no differences between overall vital sign, BIS and OAAS/S in 2 groups (P > 0.05). However, we figured out patients in group 2 had decreased pain sensation during sedation.
CONCLUSIONS
Co-administration of propofol along with remifentanil via a TCI for the surgical extraction of impacted teeth may be safe and effective compared to propofol only administration.

Keyword

Propofol; Remifentanil; Sedation; Target concentration; Target controlled infusion; Tooth extraction

MeSH Terms

Blood Pressure
Conscious Sedation*
Demography
Ethics Committees, Research
Heart Rate
Humans
Outpatients
Oxygen
Propofol*
Respiratory Rate
Sensation
Tooth Extraction
Tooth, Impacted*
Vital Signs
Oxygen
Propofol