J Korean Acad Prosthodont.  2008 Feb;46(1):22-30.

Comparative study in fracture strength of zirconia cores fabricated with three different CAD/CAM systems

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Korea. leeys@hanyang.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare three different CAD/CAM systems through the fracture strength of zirconia core and to evaluate the clinical availability of each system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following three groups of 30 maxillary mesial incisor core for all-ceramics(each group 10) were fabricated as follows: group 1. Adens(R) CAD/CAM system, group 2. Cerasys(R) CAD/CAM system, group 3. 3M LAVA(R)CAD/CAM system. All specimens were manufactured consistently thickness 0.5mm and relief 40 micrometer. Specimens were subjected to compressive loading on the lingual area by Z250/SN5S(R). Each group's mean and standard deviation were calculated and Kruskal Waillis test, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test were utilized to find out the relationship among the groups.
RESULTS
The results were as follows: 1. The mean fracture strength of Adens(R) system was 615.89+/-156.1N, the Cerasys(R) system was 863.98+/-151.5N, and the 3M LAVA(R) system was 1143.1+/-286.6N. 2. The fracture strength of the systems showed the significant statistical differences in order of 3M LAVA(R) system, Cerasys(R) system, Adens(R) system.
CONCLUSION
In this study, in spite of the differences among the groups, every group showed clinically useful results. It is necessary to study further clinical experiments on a long term basis.

Keyword

Zirconia core; Fracture strength; CAD/CAM system; All-ceramic crown

MeSH Terms

Incisor
Zirconium
Zirconium
Full Text Links
  • JKAP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr