Role of Bronchodilator Reversibility Testing in Differentiating Asthma From COPD

Oh, Yeon Mok; Lim, Chae Man; Shim, Tae Sun; Koh, Younsuck; Kim, Woo Sung; Kim, Dong Soon; Kim, Won Dong; Kim, Se Kyu; Yoo, Jee Hong; Lee, Sang Do

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although bronchodilator reversibility testing is widely performed to diagnose asthma or COPD, there is debate upon its usefulness and methods to differentiate asthma from COPD. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the role of bronchodilator reversibility testing in differentiating asthma from COPD and to confirm which method is better at evaluating bronchodilator reversibility.
METHODS
26 asthma patients and 31 COPD patients were reviewed retrospectively. Spirometry was performed before and after bronchodilator inhalation to get FEV1, FVC. To evaluate bronchodilator reversibility, the increase in FEV1 or FVC was expressed as three methods, 'percentage of the baseline value', 'percentage of the predicted value', or 'absolute value'. Area under the ROC curve was measured to compare the three methods. In addition, the criteria of American Thoracic Society (ATS) for bronchodilator reversibility were compared to those of European Respiratory Society (ERS).
RESULTS
1.In differentiating asthma from COPD, 'percentage of the predicted value', or 'absolute value' method was useful but 'percentage of the baseline value' was not. However, the ability to differentiate was weak because areas under the ROC curves by all methods were less than 0.75. 2.The criteria of ERS were superior to those of ATS for bronchodilator reversibility to differentiate asthma from COPD because likelihood ratio (LR) of a positive test by ERS criteria was greater than ATS criteria and because LR of a negative test by ERS criteria was less than ATS criteria.
CONCLUSION
In differentiating asthma from COPD, bronchodilator reversibility testing has a weak role and should be considered as an adjunctive test.