Restor Dent Endod.  2015 Nov;40(4):299-305. 10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.299.

The effect of saliva decontamination procedures on dentin bond strength after universal adhesive curing

• Kim J
• Hong S
• Choi Y
• Park S

• KMID: 2316950
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.299

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of multiple decontamination procedures for salivary contamination after curing of a universal adhesive on dentin bond strength according to its etch modes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty-two extracted bovine incisors were trimmed by exposing the labial dentin surfaces and embedded in cylindrical molds. A universal adhesive (All-Bond Universal, Bisco) was used. The teeth were randomly divided into groups according to etch mode and decontamination procedure. The adhesive was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions for a given etch mode. With the exception of the control groups, the cured adhesive was contaminated with saliva for 20 sec. In the self-etch group, the teeth were divided into three groups: control, decontamination with rinsing and drying, and decontamination with rinsing, drying, and adhesive. In the etch-and-rinse group, the teeth were divided into four groups: control, decontamination with rinsing and drying, decontamination with rinsing, drying, and adhesive, and decontamination with rinsing, drying, re-etching, and reapplication of adhesive. A composite resin (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) was used for filling and was cured on the treated surfaces. Shear bond strength was measured, and failure modes were evaluated. The data were subjected to one-way analysis of variation and Tukey's HSD test.
RESULTS
The etch-and-rinse subgroup that was decontaminated by rinse, drying, re-etching, and reapplication of adhesive showed a significantly higher bond strength.
CONCLUSIONS
When salivary contamination occurs after curing of the universal adhesive, additional etching improves the bond strength to dentin.

Keyword

Salivary contamination; Shear bond strength; Universal adhesive

MeSH Terms

Adhesives*
Decontamination*
Dentin*
Fungi
Incisor
Saliva*
Tooth
Adhesives

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 Percentage of failure modes of the tested groups.

Reference

1. Hiraishi N, Kitasako Y, Nikaido T, Nomura S, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Effect of artificial saliva contamination on pH value change and dentin bond strength. Dent Mater. 2003; 19:429–434.

2. Park JW, Lee KC. The influence of salivary contamination on shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2004; 29:437–442.

3. Yoo HM, Oh TS, Pereira PN. Effect of saliva contamination on the microshear bond strength of one-step self-etching adhesive systems to dentin. Oper Dent. 2006; 31:127–134.

4. Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of saliva contamination on dentin bond strength using all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2006; 8:311–318.

5. Johnson ME, Burgess JO, Hermesch CB, Buikema DJ. Saliva contamination of dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent. 1994; 19:205–210.

6. Taskonak B, Sertgöz A. Shear bond strengths of saliva contaminated 'one-bottle' adhesives. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29:559–564.

7. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012; 40:475–484.

8. Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent. 2012; 25:153–158.

9. Eiriksson SO, Pereira PN, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO, Sigurdsson A. Effects of saliva contamination on resin-resin bond strength. Dent Mater. 2004; 20:37–44.

10. Humphrey SP, Williamson RT. A review of saliva: normal composition, flow, and function. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85:162–169.

11. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater. 1993; 9:295–299.

12. el-Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Saliva contamination and bond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 1997; 10:83–87.

13. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Stean H. Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29:567–572.

14. Townsend RD, Dunn WJ. The effect of saliva contamination on enamel and dentin using a self-etching adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135:895–901.

15. Yazici AR, Tuncer D, Dayangaç B, Ozgünaltay G, Onen A. The effect of saliva contamination on microleakage of an etch-and-rinse and a self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9:305–309.

16. Jiang Q, Pan H, Liang B, Fu B, Hannig M. Effect of saliva contamination and decontamination on bovine enamel bond strength of four self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent. 2010; 35:194–202.

17. Patil SB, Shivakumar AT, Shah S. Effect of salivary contamination on shear bond strength of two adhesives: An in vitro study. Dent Hypotheses. 2014; 5:115–120.

18. Guerriero LN, Vieira SN, Scaramucci T, Kawaguchi FA, Sobral MAP, Matos AB. Effect of saliva contamination on the bond strength of an etch-and-rinse adhesive system to dentin. Rev Odonto Ciênc. 2009; 24:410–413.

19. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B, Tomé AR, Vanherle G, Lopes AB. Morphological field emission-SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater. 1996; 12:262–271.

20. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Bonding efficiency and interfacial morphology of one-bottle adhesives to contaminated dentin surfaces. Am J Dent. 1998; 11:281–285.

21. Koppolu M, Gogala D, Mathew VB, Thangala V, Deepthi M, Sasidhar N. Effect of saliva and blood contamination on the bond strength of self-etching adhesive system-An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2012; 15:270–273.

22. Pinzon LM, Oguri M, O'Keefe K, Dusevish V, Spencer P, Powers JM, Marshall GW. Bond strength of adhesives to dentin contaminated with smoker's saliva. Odontology. 2010; 98:37–43.

23. Cobanoglu N, Unlu N, Ozer FF, Blatz MB. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives after saliva contamination at different application steps. Oper Dent. 2013; 38:505–511.

24. Ari H, Dõnmez N, Belli S. Effect of artificial saliva contamination on bond strength to pulp chamber dentin. Eur J Dent. 2008; 2:86–90.

25. Darabi F, Tavangar M, Davalloo R. Effect of different decontamination procedures from a saliva-contaminated cured bonding system (Single Bond). Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012; 9:399–403.

26. Justin RM, Paranthaman H, Rajesh AG, Varghese RP, Ranganath LM. Effect of salivary contamination on the bond strength of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012; 13:655–660.

27. Suryakumari NB, Reddy PS, Surender LR, Kiran R. In vitro evaluation of influence of salivary contamination on the dentin bond strength of one-bottle adhesive systems. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011; 2:160–164.

28. Reis A, Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Bauer JR, Grande RH, Klein-Junior CA, Baumhardt-Neto R, Loguercio AD. Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin? J Dent. 2008; 36:309–315.

29. Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Immediate Adhesive Properties to Dentin and Enamel of a Universal Adhesive Associated With a Hydrophobic Resin Coat. Oper Dent. 2014; 39:489–499.

30. Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Szesz AL, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH, Perdigão J. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. J Dent. 2014; 42:595–602.

31. Salz U, Zimmermann J, Zeuner F, Mozner N. Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7:107–116.

32. Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Takahashi M, Itoh S, Ikeda M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Relationship between mechanical properties of one-step self-etch adhesives and water sorption. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:360–367.

33. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005; 84:183–188.

34. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005; 21:895–910.

35. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:1412–1419.

36. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:90–101.

37. de Andrade e Silva SM, Carrilho MR, Marquezini Junior L, Garcia FC, Manso AP, Alves MC, de Carvalho RM. Effect of an additional hydrophilic versus hydrophobic coat on the quality of dentinal sealing provided by two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17:184–189.

38. Reis A, Grande RH, Oliveira GM, Lopes GC, Loguercio AD. A 2-year evaluation of moisture on microtensile bond strength and nanoleakage. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:862–870.

39. Reis A, de Carvalho Cardoso P, Vieira LC, Baratieri LN, Grande RH, Loguercio AD. Effect of prolonged application times on the durability of resin-dentin bonds. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:639–644.

40. Lee IS, Son SA, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. The effect of additional etching and curing mechanism of composite resin on the dentin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5:479–484.

41. Ahn J, Jung KH, Son SA, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. Effect of additional etching and ethanol-wet bonding on the dentin bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives. Restor Dent Endod. 2015; 40:68–74.