J Mov Disord.  2016 Jan;9(1):3-13. 10.14802/jmd.15060.

Clinical Approach to Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

Affiliations
  • 1Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. h.ling@ucl.ac.uk
  • 2Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
  • 3Sara Koe PSP Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

Abstract

Sixty years ago, Steele, Richardson and Olszewski designated progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) as a new clinicopathological entity in their seminal paper. Since then, in addition to the classic Richardson's syndrome (RS), different clinical phenotypic presentations have been linked with this four-repeat tauopathy. The clinical heterogeneity is associated with variability of regional distribution and severity of abnormal tau accumulation and neuronal loss. In PSP subtypes, the presence of certain clinical pointers may be useful for antemortem prediction of the underlying PSP-tau pathology. Midbrain atrophy on conventional MRI correlates with the clinical phenotype of RS but is not predictive of PSP pathology. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and tau ligand positron emission tomography are promising biomarkers of PSP. A multidisciplinary approach to meet the patients' complex needs is the current core treatment strategy for this devastating disorder.

Keyword

Progressive supranuclear palsy; Richardson's syndrome; Corticobasal syndrome; Tauopathy; Atypical parkinsonism

MeSH Terms

Atrophy
Biomarkers
Cerebrospinal Fluid
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mesencephalon
Neurons
Pathology
Phenotype
Population Characteristics
Positron-Emission Tomography
Steel
Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive*
Tauopathies
Biomarkers
Steel
Full Text Links
  • JMD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr