J Lab Med Qual Assur.  2010 Jun;32(1):171-179.

Performance Evaluation of Four Hematologic Quality Control Materials for the Standardization of External Quality Assessment

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chungnam University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea. kckwon@cnu.ac,kr
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Eulji University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
  • 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since various hematology analyzers apply common or different principles in complete blood counting, difference between measured values could developed according to the control material used in external quality assessment. Diagnostic Hematology Subcommittee has been using formalin fixed blood and Liquichek(TM) Hematology-16 (Bio-Rad, USA) as control material of external quality assessment alternately but recently significant difference of test results was found in some analyzers. We intended to select adequate control material showing similar test results in most analyzers.
METHODS
Using fresh whole blood, formalin fixed blood, Liquichek(TM) Hematology-16 and CBC-4K (R&D, USA), 5 parameters (WBC, RBC, Hb, Hct, platelet) were measured in 4 hematology analyzers; CELL-DYN sapphire (Abbott Diagnostics, USA), Coulter LH750 (Beckman Coulter, USA), ADVIA 2120 (Siemens Diagnostics, USA) and Sysmex XE-2100 (Sysmex Co., Japan). Linearity, within-run precision and between-day precision of 4 materials for each parameter were evaluated at different analyzers.
RESULTS
The between-day precisions for WBC of formalin fixed blood showed very high CVs of 6.5~13.5% in all 4 hematology analyzers. The within-run and between-day precisions for WBC and platelet of Liquichek(TM) Hematology-16 showed high CVs of 9.3%, 16% and 19.8%, 18%, respectively in CELL-DYN analyzer. But, CBC-4K showed a good linearity (r2=0.9953~0.9993) and precision (within-run CVs, 0~1.5% and between-day CVs, 0~2.0%) in all analyzers.
CONCLUSIONS
Fresh whole blood, formalin fixed blood and Liquichek(TM) Hematology-16 are not appropriate for standardization of external quality control materials because of some different test results among analyzers. We conclude that CBC-4K with good performance in all hematology analyzer is adequate as external quality control material.

Keyword

External quality assessment; Quality control material; Complete blood count

MeSH Terms

Aluminum Oxide
Blood Cell Count
Blood Platelets
Formaldehyde
Hematology
Quality Control
Aluminum Oxide
Formaldehyde
Full Text Links
  • JLMQA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr