Korean J Hematol.  2006 Jun;41(2):83-91. 10.5045/kjh.2006.41.2.83.

Clinical Efficacy of Thalidomide Containing Regimens as a Primary Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Affiliations
  • 1NUHSK Group, Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam, Korea. drjejung@chonnam.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
  • 3Department of Hematology-Oncology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide-containing regimens as the first-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma.
METHODS
A total of 60 patients were initially treated with thalidomide-containing regimens at three institutions. Thalidomide was given with two different regimens: the TD regimen (thalidomide and dexamethasone) and the TCD regimen (thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone). Autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were collected after mobilizing with G-CSF with or without cyclophosphamide.
RESULTS
Of all the patients, 56 patients (TD regimen: 12 patients, TCD regimen: 44 patients) who received at least 4 cycles or more were evaluated for response and toxicity. The median age of the patients was 65.5 years (age range: 39~80 years). The overall response rate for the thalidomide-containing regimens was 85.5%. There were 3 (25%) complete responses and 6 (50%) partial responses for the TD regimen and there were 17 (38.6%) complete responses and 21 (47.7%) partial responses for the TCD regimen, respectively. The toxicity, according to the NCI-CTC (grade 3/4) included neutropenia in 7 patients (12.5%), thrombocytopenia in 4 patients (7.1%), infection in 6 patients (10.7%) and neuropathy in 10 patients (17.8%). In addition, there were 2 patients (3.6%) with thrombosis. Thirteen patients, who achieved more than a partial response to the thalidomide-containing regimen, proceeded to PBSC collection and the median number of CD34+ cells collected was 3.8 x 106/kg.
CONCLUSION
Thalidomide-based combination chemotherapy is a safe, well tolerated and effective regimen for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, and it showed a high response rates, relatively low toxicity and sufficient collection of PBSCs.

Keyword

Thalidomide; Multiple myeloma; Primary therapy

MeSH Terms

Cyclophosphamide
Drug Therapy, Combination
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Humans
Multiple Myeloma*
Neutropenia
Stem Cells
Thalidomide*
Thrombocytopenia
Thrombosis
Cyclophosphamide
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Thalidomide

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 56 multiple myeloma patients treated with thalidomide-containing regimens as a primary therapy.

  • Fig. 2 OS (A) and PFS (B) of 56 multiple myeloma patients, according to thalidomide-containing regimens as a primary therapy (OS: P=0.82; PFS: P=0.27).

  • Fig. 3 OS (A) and PFS (B) of 56 multiple myeloma patients, according to the undergoing autologous transplantation (OS: P=0.27; PFS: P=0.18).


Reference

1). Kyle RA., Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2004. 351:1860–73.
Article
2). Sirohi B., Powles R. Multiple myeloma. Lancet. 2004. 363:875–87.
Article
3). Galton DA., Peto R. A progress report on the Medical Research Council's therapeutic trial in myelomatosis. Br J Haematol. 1968. 15:319–20.
4). Barlogie B., Jagannath S., Desikan KR, et al. Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 1999. 93:55–65.
Article
5). Samson D., Gaminara E., Newland A, et al. Infusion of vincristine and doxorubicin with oral dexamethasone as first-line therapy for multiple myeloma. Lancet. 1989. 2:882–5.
Article
6). Singhal S., Mehta J., Desikan R, et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 1999. 341:1565–71.
Article
7). Palumbo A., Giaccone L., Bertola A, et al. Low-dose thalidomide plus dexamethasone is an effective salvage therapy for advanced myeloma. Haematologica. 2001. 86:399–403.
8). Tosi P., Zamagni E., Cellini C, et al. Salvage therapy with thalidomide in patients with advanced relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2002. 87:408–14.
Article
9). Rajkumar SV., Kyle RA. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005. 80:1371–82.
Article
10). Cavo M., Zamagni E., Tosi P, et al. Superiority of thalidomide and dexamethasone over vincristine-doxorubicindexamethasone (VAD) as primary therapy in preparation for autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2005. 106:35–9.
Article
11). Dimopoulos MA., Hamilos G., Zomas A, et al. Pulsed cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone: an oral regimen for previously treated patients with multiple myeloma. Hematol J. 2004. 5:112–7.
Article
12). Palumbo A., Bertola A., Musto P, et al. Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide for newly diagnosed patients with myeloma. Cancer. 2005. 104:1428–33.
Article
13). Oken MM., Pomeroy C., Weisdorf D., Bennett JM. Prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of early infection in multiple myeloma. Am J Med. 1996. 100:624–8.
Article
14). Blade J., Samson D., Reece D, et al. Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant. Br J Haematol. 1998. 102:1115–23.
15). Greipp PR., San Miguel J., Durie BG, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005. 23:3412–20.
Article
16). Rajkumar SV., Hayman S., Gertz MA, et al. Combination therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly diagnosed myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2002. 20:4319–23.
Article
17). Weber D., Rankin K., Gavino M., Delasalle K., Alexani-an R. Thalidomide alone or with dexamethasone for previously untreated multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2003. 21:16–9.
Article
18). Rajkumar SV. Thalidomide: tragic past and promising future. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004. 79:899–903.
Article
19). Garcia-Sanz R., Gonzalez-Porras JR., Hernandez JM, et al. The oral combination of thalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (ThaCyDex) is effective in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2004. 18:856–63.
Article
20). Bruno B., Rotta M., Giaccone L, et al. New drugs for treatment of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2004. 430–42.
Article
21). Ghobrial IM., Rajkumar SV. Management of thalidomide toxicity. J Support Oncol. 2003. 1:194–205.
22). Dimopoulos MA., Anagnostopoulos A., Weber D. Treatment of plasma cell dyscrasias with thalidomide and its derivatives. J Clin Oncol. 2003. 21:4444–54.
Article
23). Zangari M., Siegel E., Barlogie B, et al. Thrombogenic activity of doxorubicin in myeloma patients receiving thalidomide: implications for therapy. Blood. 2002. 100:1168–71.
Article
24). Osman K., Comenzo R., Rajkumar SV. Deep venous thrombosis and thalidomide therapy for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2001. 344:1951–2.
Article
25). Tricot G., Jagannath S., Vesole D, et al. Peripheral blood stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma: identification of favorable variables for rapid engraftment in 225 patients. Blood. 1995. 85:588–96.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJH
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr