J Korean Acad Prosthodont.  2015 Jan;53(1):81-85. 10.4047/jkap.2015.53.1.81.

Functional and esthetical full mouth rehabilitation with implant supported prostheses: A case report

• Yeon JW
• Lim YJ
• Kwon HB
• Kim MJ

• KMID: 2057211
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.1.81

Abstract

This report describes the prosthetic treatment of a patient with multiple missing teeth. Installation of five fixtures on maxilla with sinus lift and six fixtures on mandible with ramal bone graft were performed. With implant supported all-ceramic with zirconia core using CAD/CAM technology and porcelain-fused-to-gold prosthesis, treatment with positive outcome which satisfies both functional and esthetical aspect was obtained.

Keyword

Dental implants; CAD-CAM; Full mouth rehabilitation

MeSH Terms

Computer-Aided Design
Dental Implants
Humans
Mandible
Maxilla
Mouth Rehabilitation*
Prostheses and Implants*
Tooth
Transplants
Dental Implants

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. (A) Pretreatment intraoral view, (B) Pretreatment panoramic radiograph.

• 

  Fig. 2. Postoperative intraoral view. (A) Frontal view, (B, C) Occlusal view, (D, E) Buccal view.

• 

  Fig. 3. Panoramic radiograph 18 months after placement of definitive prosthesis.

Reference

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Bra�nemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10:387–416.

2. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I, Higuchi K, Laney W, Linden U, Astrand P. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5:272–81.

3. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Bu¨rgin W, Bra¨gger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16:185–93.

4. Budtz-Jo¨rgensen E. Restoration of the partially edentulous mouth-a comparison of overdentures, removable partial dentures, fixed partial dentures and implant treatment. J Dent. 1996; 24:237–44.

5. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92:557–62.

6. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98:389–404.

7. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bra¨gger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15:625–42.

8. Bozini T, Petridis H, Garefis K, Garefis P. A meta-analysis of prosthodontic complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in edentulous patients after an observation period of at least 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26:304–18.

9. Triwatana P, Nagaviroj N, Tulapornchai C. Clinical perfor-mance and failures of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a review literature. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012; 4:76–83.