1. Schaller B. Gender-related differences in prolactinomas. A clinicopathological study. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2005; 26:152–159.
2. Shimon I, Benbassat C, Hadani M. Effectiveness of long-term cabergoline treatment for giant prolactinoma: study of 12 men. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007; 156:225–231.
Article
3. Wu ZB, Yu CJ, Su ZP, Zhuge QC, Wu JS, Zheng WM. Bromocriptine treatment of invasive giant prolactinomas involving the cavernous sinus: results of a long-term follow up. J Neurosurg. 2006; 104:54–61.
Article
4. Fraioli MF, Novegno F, Catena E, Fraioli C, Moschettoni L. Multidisciplinary treatment of giant invasive prolactinomas in paediatric age: long-term follow-up in two children. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010; 26:1233–1237.
Article
5. Serri O, Rasio E, Beauregard H, Hardy J, Somma M. Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after selective transsphenoidal adenomectomy in women with prolactinoma. N Engl J Med. 1983; 309:280–283.
Article
6. Nelson PB, Goodman M, Maroon JC, Martinez AJ, Moossy J, Robinson AG. Factors in predicting outcome from operation in patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery. 1983; 13:634–641.
Article
7. Pinzone JJ, Katznelson L, Danila DC, Pauler DK, Miller CS, Klibanski A. Primary medical therapy of micro- and macroprolactinomas in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 85:3053–3057.
Article
8. Passos VQ, Souza JJ, Musolino NR, Bronstein MD. Long-term follow-up of prolactinomas: normoprolactinemia after bromocriptine withdrawal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87:3578–3582.
Article
9. Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery. 1993; 33:610–617. discussion 617-8.
Article
10. Molitch ME. Prolactin-secreting tumors: what's new? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2006; 6:Suppl 9. S29–S35.
Article
11. Saeki N, Nakamura M, Sunami K, Yamaura A. Surgical indication after bromocriptine therapy on giant prolactinomas: effects and limitations of the medical treatment. Endocr J. 1998; 45:529–537.
Article
12. Wu ZB, Su ZP, Wu JS, Zheng WM, Zhuge QC, Zhong M. Five years follow-up of invasive prolactinomas with special reference to the control of cavernous sinus invasion. Pituitary. 2008; 11:63–70.
Article
13. Colao A, Annunziato L, Lombardi G. Treatment of prolactinomas. Ann Med. 1998; 30:452–459.
Article
14. Delgrange E, Duprez T, Maiter D. Influence of parasellar extension of macroprolactinomas defined by magnetic resonance imaging on their responsiveness to dopamine agonist therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006; 64:456–462.
Article
15. Cho EH, Lee SA, Chung JY, et al. Efficacy and safety of cabergoline as first line treatment for invasive giant prolactinoma. J Korean Med Sci. 2009; 24:874–878.
Article
16. McCollough WM, Marcus RB Jr, Rhoton AL Jr, Ballinger WE, Million RR. Long-term follow-up of radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma: the absence of late recurrence after greater than or equal to 4500 cGy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991; 21:607–614.
Article
17. Turbin RE, Thompson CR, Kennerdell JS, Cockerham KP, Kupersmith MJ. A long-term visual outcome comparison in patients with optic nerve sheath meningioma managed with observation, surgery, radiotherapy, or surgery and radiotherapy. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:890–899. discussion 899-900.
Article
18. Kontogeorgos G, Horvath E, Kovacs K, et al. Morphologic changes of prolactin-producing pituitary adenomas after short treatment with dopamine agonists. Acta Neuropathol. 2006; 111:46–52.
Article
19. Yang MS, Hong JW, Lee SK, Lee EJ, Kim SH. Clinical management and outcome of 36 invasive prolactinomas treated with dopamine agonist. J Neurooncol. 2011; 104:195–204.
Article
20. Lesser RL, Zheutlin JD, Boghen D, Odel JG, Robbins RJ. Visual function improvement in patients with macroprolactinomas treated with bromocriptine. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990; 109:535–543.
Article
21. Zahra MA, Tan LT, Priest AN, et al. Semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements predict radiation response in cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74:766–773.
Article
22. George ML, Dzik-Jurasz AS, Padhani AR, et al. Non-invasive methods of assessing angiogenesis and their value in predicting response to treatment in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2001; 88:1628–1636.
Article
23. Toita T, Nakano M, Higashi M, Sakumoto K, Kanazawa K. Prognostic value of cervical size and pelvic lymph node status assessed by computed tomography for patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by radical radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995; 33:843–849.
Article