Korean J Med.
2000 Mar;58(3):283-292.
The usefulness of the genetic markers at the low-density lipoprotein
receptor gene locus for the genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia
- Affiliations
-
- 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
- 2Yonsei Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
- 3Department of Clinical Pathology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
- 4Department of Internal Medicine, Chosun University, Kwangju, Korea.
Abstract
-
BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia(FH) is an autosomal dominant metabolic disorder
caused by the mutation in low density lipoprotein receptor(LDLR) gene. However, direct genetic diagnosis
of LDLR gene mutation is not easily available because more than 300 mutations have been described in LDLR
gene of FH patients. Therefore indirect genetic diagnosis using the genetic markers can be used to follow
the inheritance of defective gene in FH families. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness
of indirect genetic markers for detecting identical-by-descent LDLR gene abnormalities in FH families.
METHODS
We examined the allele frequency, heterozygosity, polymorphism information content(PIC)
of each genetic markers(D19S394, Taq I, Hinc II, Ava II, ATn, D19S221) in 94 unrelated healthy subjects.
The genetic polymorphic haplotypes in 3 FH families were also determined.
RESULTS
The heterozygosity and PIC values of RFLP's(Taq I, Hinc II, Ava II) were 0.51/0.344,
0.25/0.223, 0.28/0.233 and microsatellite markers(D19S394, ATn, D19S221) were 0.64/0.558, 0.56/0.455,
0.60/0.475. Hinc II and Ava II were significantly linked(|D|=0.72, p< 0.05). The cumulative PIC values
of Taq I+Hinc II, Taq I+Hinc II+ATn, D19S394+ATn were 0.520, 0.814, 0.813, respectively.
When applied in the FH pedigree, the genetic diagnosis using only one marker was not available
in most cases. However, combination of two or more genetic markers could successfully discriminate
the affected and unaffected members in FH families. Among the several combinations of the genetic markers,
the combination of D19S394 and ATn was supposed to be the most effective and informative. Because
one case of recombination was suspected in D19S221 allele, it was thought to be carefully used for
genetic diagnosis of FH.
CONCLUSION
We concluded that indirect genetic diagnosis using intragenic
or extragenic genetic markers was useful for detecting identical-by-descent LDLR gene abnormalities
in FH families and the most effective and informative combination of genetic marker seemed to be D19S394 and ATn.