Ann Clin Microbiol.  2014 Dec;17(4):110-114. 10.5145/ACM.2014.17.4.110.

The Evaluation of Recovery Rate of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Two Bacterial Transport Swab Systems and Prevalence of Co-Infection after Delayed Transport

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. hmlee.labmed@gmail.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection remains prevalent, and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance has made the treatment and control of gonorrhea more difficult. Therefore, it is important to compare isolation methods and transport media to overcome gonorrhea via epidemiologic understanding and to determine co-infection rates with other sexually transmitted diseases among primary-care hospitals. In this study, we determine the recovery rate of transferred specimens according to type of transport media and co-infection rate using PCR.
METHODS
Genital specimens were collected at three primary-care hospitals from January 2010 to November 2012 using transgrow media and commercial BD transport media. Culture and multiplex PCR were conducted to isolate N. gonorrhoeae.
RESULTS
Among 162 specimens, 57 (35.2%) isolates were recovered, and 146 (90.1%) specimens were positive for multiplex PCR. The recovery rate was 29.9% (78/261) using transgrow media and 19.2% (50/261) using BD transport media. The most common co-infected bacteria with N. gonorrhoeae was Chlamydia trachomatis (15.8%), followed by Mycoplasma hominis (6.2%) and M. genitalium (3.4%).
CONCLUSION
Under general transport conditions, the rate of recovery of N. gonorrhoeae was as low as 19.2-29.9% depending on the type of transport media, suggesting that molecular diagnostic methods are required to detect the remaining 70% of gonorrhea-infected patients. Co-infection with other sexually transmitted diseases was not rare, and other tests for accurate additional antimicrobial regimens should also be considered.

Keyword

Multiplex PCR; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Transgrow media; Urogenital sample

MeSH Terms

Bacteria
Chlamydia trachomatis
Coinfection*
Gonorrhea
Humans
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Mycoplasma hominis
Neisseria gonorrhoeae*
Pathology, Molecular
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Prevalence*
Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Reference

1.World Health Organization. Global action plan to control the spread and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoea. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44863. [Online] (last visited on 31 September 2014).
2.Amstey MS., Steadman KT. Asymptomatic gonorrhea and pregnancy. J Am Vener Dis Assoc. 1976. 3:14–6.
3.Handsfield HH., Lipman TO., Harnisch JP., Tronca E., Holmes KK. Asymptomatic gonorrhea in men. Diagnosis, natural course, preva-lence and significance. N Engl J Med. 1974. 290:117–23.
4.Holmes KK., Counts GW., Beaty HN. Disseminated gonococcal infection. Ann Intern Med. 1971. 74:979–93.
Article
5.Chow AW., Malkasian KL., Marshall JR., Guze LB. The bacteriol-ogy of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975. 122:876–9.
Article
6.CDC. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf. [Online] (last visited on 31 March 2014).
7.Ameyama S., Onodera S., Takahata M., Minami S., Maki N., Endo K, et al. Mosaic-like structure of penicillin-binding protein 2 gene (penA) in clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to cefixime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002. 46:3744–9.
8.Ohnishi M., Saika T., Hoshina S., Iwasaku K., Nakayama S., Watanabe H, et al. Ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011. 17:148–9.
9.Goh BT., Varia KB., Ayliffe PF., Lim FK. Diagnosis of gonorrhea by gram-stained smears and cultures in men and women: role of the urethral smear. Sex Transm Dis. 1985. 12:135–9.
10.Van Dyck E., Ieven M., Pattyn S., Van Damme L., Laga M. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. 39:1751–6.
11.Higgins SP., Klapper PE., Struthers JK., Bailey AS., Gough AP., Moore R, et al. Detection of male genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using an automated multiplex PCR system (Cobas Amplicor). Int J STD AIDS. 1998. 9:21–4.
12.Koumans EH., Johnson RE., Knapp JS., St Louis ME. Laboratory testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae by recently introduced non-culture tests: a performance review with clinical and public health considerations. Clin Infect Dis. 1998. 27:1171–80.
13.Stary A., Ching SF., Teodorowicz L., Lee H. Comparison of ligase chain reaction and culture for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genital and extragenital specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1997. 35:239–42.
14.Schink JC., Keith LG. Problems in the culture diagnosis of gonorrhea. J Reprod Med. 1985. 30(3 Suppl):244–9.
15.Rishmawi N., Ghneim R., Kattan R., Ghneim R., Zoughbi M., Abu-Diab A, et al. Survival of fastidious and nonfastidious aerobic bacteria in three bacterial transport swab systems. J Clin Microbiol. 2007. 45:1278–83.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ACM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr