Yonsei Med J.  2013 Sep;54(5):1127-1136. 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.5.1127.

Reduced Food Intake is the Major Contributor to the Protective Effect of Rimonabant on Islet in Established Obesity-Associated Type 2 Diabetes

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jaehyeon@skku.edu
  • 2Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Diabetes Research Institute, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Food and Nutrition, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
  • 5Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. cyber.park@samsung.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
Although the presence of cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptor in islets has been reported, the major contributor to the protective effect of rimonabant on islet morphology is unknown. We determined whether the protective effect of rimonabant on pancreatic islet morphology is valid in established diabetes and also whether any effect was independent of decreased food intake.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
After diabetes was confirmed, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rats, aged 32 weeks, were treated with rimonabant (30 mg/kg/d, rimonabant group) for 6 weeks. Metabolic profiles and islet morphology of rats treated with rimonabant were compared with those of controls without treatment (control group), a pair-fed control group, and rats treated with rosiglitazone (4 mg/kg/d, rosiglitazone group).
RESULTS
Compared to the control group, rats treated with rimonabant exhibited reduced glycated albumin levels (p<0.001), islet fibrosis (p<0.01), and improved glucose tolerance (p<0.05), with no differences from the pair-fed control group. The retroperitoneal adipose tissue mass was lower in the rimonabant group than those of the pair-fed control and rosiglitazone groups (p<0.05). Rimonabant, pair-fed control, and rosiglitazone groups showed decreased insulin resistance and increased adiponectin, with no differences between the rimonabant and pair-fed control groups.
CONCLUSION
Rimonabant had a protective effect on islet morphology in vivo even in established diabetes. However, the protective effect was also reproduced by pair-feeding. Thus, the results of this study did not support the significance of islet CB1 receptors in islet protection with rimonabant in established obesity-associated type 2 diabetes.

Keyword

Cannabinoid receptor CB1; rimonabant; islet; type 2 diabetes

MeSH Terms

Adiponectin/metabolism
Adiposity/drug effects
Animals
Cell Proliferation/drug effects
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diet therapy/*drug therapy
Eating/*drug effects
Glucose Intolerance/diet therapy/*drug therapy
Insulin Resistance
Insulin-Secreting Cells/*drug effects/pathology
Male
Piperidines/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
Pyrazoles/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
Rats
Rats, Inbred OLETF
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/physiology
Thiazolidinediones/*therapeutic use
Adiponectin
Piperidines
Pyrazoles
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1
Thiazolidinediones

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Food intake and weight change in OLETF (A and B) and LETO (C and D) rats over a treatment period of 6 weeks. Error bars represent standard deviation. *p<0.05 for control vs. rimonabant group; †p<0.01 for control vs. rimonabant group; ‡p<0.001 for control vs. rimonabant group. Oral glucose tolerance test before (E) and after treatment for 6 weeks (F). After treatment, the area under the curve (mg/dL×min) for each group was 48792±3340 for the control group, 36653±3692 for the rimonabant group, 39223±4156 for the pair-fed control group, and 42850±5885 for the rosiglitazone group (p=0.2591). *p<0.05 for control vs. rimonabant group. (G) Glycated albumin levels of each group before and after treatment for 6 weeks. †p<0.01; ‡p<0.001. LETO, Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka; OLETF, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Relative beta-cell area of each group after treatment. *p<0.05 for control vs. pair-fed control group in OLETF rats; †p<0.01 for control groups in LETO vs. OLETF rats. (B) Representative islet morphology after treatment. Brown indicates insulin-stained beta-cells. Original magnification, ×40. OLETF, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty; LETO, Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka.

  • Fig. 3 Islet fibrosis and beta-cell proliferation in OLETF rats. (A) Relative area of fibrosis in each group of OLETF rats after treatment; *p<0.01. (B) Representative islet morphology after treatment in OLETF rats. Fibrotic tissue was stained by Masson's trichrome. Original magnification ×200. (C) Average BrdU+/insulin+ cell number per beta-cell area. OLETF, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty.

  • Fig. 4 Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) of each group after the treatment period in LETO (A) and OLETF (B) rats. HOMA-IR was calculated from the following formula: HOMA-IR=[fasting serum insulin (µU/mL)]×[fasting serum glucose (mmol/L)]/22.5. Fasting serum adiponectin levels of each group after the treatment period in LETO (C) and OLETF (D) rats. LETO, Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka; OLETF, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty. *p<0.05; †p<0.01; ‡p<0.001.

  • Fig. 5 Adipose tissue mass of each group after the treatment period. Retroperitoneal (A), subcutaneous (B), mesenteric (C), and eipididymal (D) fat mass in LETO rats. *p<0.05; †p<0.01; ‡p<0.001. Retroperitoneal (E), subcutaneous (F), mesenteric (G), and eipididymal (H) fat mass in OLETF rats. *p<0.05; †p<0.01. OLETF, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty; LETO, Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka.


Reference

1. Koh EH, Kim MS, Park JY, Kim HS, Youn JY, Park HS, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha activation prevents diabetes in OLETF rats: comparison with PPAR-gamma activation. Diabetes. 2003; 52:2331–2337.
Article
2. Duvivier VF, Delafoy-Plasse L, Delion V, Lechevalier P, Le Bail JC, Guillot E, et al. Beneficial effect of a chronic treatment with rimonabant on pancreatic function and beta-cell morphology in Zucker Fatty rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009; 616:314–320.
Article
3. Finegood DT, McArthur MD, Kojwang D, Thomas MJ, Topp BG, Leonard T, et al. Beta-cell mass dynamics in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Rosiglitazone prevents the rise in net cell death. Diabetes. 2001; 50:1021–1029.
4. Janiak P, Poirier B, Bidouard JP, Cadrouvele C, Pierre F, Gouraud L, et al. Blockade of cannabinoid CB1 receptors improves renal function, metabolic profile, and increased survival of obese Zucker rats. Kidney Int. 2007; 72:1345–1357.
Article
5. Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:2457–2471.
Article
6. Singh S, Loke YK, Furberg CD. Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2007; 298:1189–1195.
Article
7. Lewis JD, Ferrara A, Peng T, Hedderson M, Bilker WB, Quesenberry CP Jr, et al. Risk of bladder cancer among diabetic patients treated with pioglitazone: interim report of a longitudinal cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34:916–922.
Article
8. Piccinni C, Motola D, Marchesini G, Poluzzi E. Assessing the association of pioglitazone use and bladder cancer through drug adverse event reporting. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34:1369–1371.
Article
9. Christensen R, Kristensen PK, Bartels EM, Bliddal H, Astrup A. Efficacy and safety of the weight-loss drug rimonabant: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2007; 370:1706–1713.
Article
10. Bermudez-Silva FJ, Viveros MP, McPartland JM, Rodriguez de Fonseca F. The endocannabinoid system, eating behavior and energy homeostasis: the end or a new beginning? Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010; 95:375–382.
Article
11. Pavon FJ, Bilbao A, Hernández-Folgado L, Cippitelli A, Jagerovic N, Abellán G, et al. Antiobesity effects of the novel in vivo neutral cannabinoid receptor antagonist 5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-hexyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole--LH 21. Neuropharmacology. 2006; 51:358–366.
Article
12. Salamone JD, McLaughlin PJ, Sink K, Makriyannis A, Parker LA. Cannabinoid CB1 receptor inverse agonists and neutral antagonists: effects on food intake, food-reinforced behavior and food aversions. Physiol Behav. 2007; 91:383–388.
Article
13. Tam J, Vemuri VK, Liu J, Bátkai S, Mukhopadhyay B, Godlewski G, et al. Peripheral CB1 cannabinoid receptor blockade improves cardiometabolic risk in mouse models of obesity. J Clin Invest. 2010; 120:2953–2966.
Article
14. Nakata M, Yada T. Cannabinoids inhibit insulin secretion and cytosolic Ca2+ oscillation in islet beta-cells via CB1 receptors. Regul Pept. 2008; 145:49–53.
Article
15. Vilches-Flores A, Delgado-Buenrostro NL, Navarrete-Vázquez G, Villalobos-Molina R. CB1 cannabinoid receptor expression is regulated by glucose and feeding in rat pancreatic islets. Regul Pept. 2010; 163:81–87.
Article
16. Getty-Kaushik L, Richard AM, Deeney JT, Krawczyk S, Shirihai O, Corkey BE. The CB1 antagonist rimonabant decreases insulin hypersecretion in rat pancreatic islets. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009; 17:1856–1860.
Article
17. Li C, Bowe JE, Huang GC, Amiel SA, Jones PM, Persaud SJ. Cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists stimulate insulin secretion from isolated human islets of Langerhans. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011; 13:903–910.
Article
18. Kawano K, Hirashima T, Mori S, Saitoh Y, Kurosumi M, Natori T. Spontaneous long-term hyperglycemic rat with diabetic complications. Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) strain. Diabetes. 1992; 41:1422–1428.
Article
19. Ishida K, Mizuno A, Min Z, Sano T, Shima K. Which is the primary etiologic event in Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rats, a model of spontaneous non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, or impaired insulin secretion? Metabolism. 1995; 44:940–945.
Article
20. Watanabe T, Kubota N, Ohsugi M, Kubota T, Takamoto I, Iwabu M, et al. Rimonabant ameliorates insulin resistance via both adiponectin-dependent and adiponectin-independent pathways. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284:1803–1812.
Article
21. Yang SJ, Choi JM, Chae SW, Kim WJ, Park SE, Rhee EJ, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma by rosiglitazone increases sirt6 expression and ameliorates hepatic steatosis in rats. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e17057.
Article
22. Kouzuma T, Usami T, Yamakoshi M, Takahashi M, Imamura S. An enzymatic method for the measurement of glycated albumin in biological samples. Clin Chim Acta. 2002; 324:61–71.
Article
23. Kouzuma T, Uemastu Y, Usami T, Imamura S. Study of glycated amino acid elimination reaction for an improved enzymatic glycated albumin measurement method. Clin Chim Acta. 2004; 346:135–143.
Article
24. Li C, Bowe JE, Jones PM, Persaud SJ. Expression and function of cannabinoid receptors in mouse islets. Islets. 2010; 2:293–302.
Article
25. Bermúdez-Silva FJ, Suárez J, Baixeras E, Cobo N, Bautista D, Cuesta-Muñoz AL, et al. Presence of functional cannabinoid receptors in human endocrine pancreas. Diabetologia. 2008; 51:476–487.
Article
26. Vettor R, Pagano C. The role of the endocannabinoid system in lipogenesis and fatty acid metabolism. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 23:51–63.
Article
27. Mølhøj S, Hansen HS, Schweiger M, Zimmermann R, Johansen T, Malmlöf K. Effect of the cannabinoid receptor-1 antagonist rimonabant on lipolysis in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010; 646:38–45.
Article
28. Moran TH, Katz LF, Plata-Salaman CR, Schwartz GJ. Disordered food intake and obesity in rats lacking cholecystokinin A receptors. Am J Physiol. 1998; 274(3 Pt 2):R618–R625.
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr