Clin Exp Vaccine Res.  2014 Jul;3(2):202-211. 10.7774/cevr.2014.3.2.202.

Immunogenicity and efficacy of a plasmid DNA rabies vaccine incorporating Myd88 as a genetic adjuvant

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurovirology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. mshampur@gmail.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
Myeloid differentiation factor 88 (Myd88), a ubiquitous Toll-like receptor adaptor molecule, has been reported to play important roles in B cell responses to infections and vaccination. The present study evaluated the effects of genetic adjuvanting with Myd88 on the immune responses to a plasmid DNA rabies vaccine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmids encoding rabies glycoprotein alone (pIRES-Rgp) or a fragment of Myd88 gene in addition (pIRES-Rgp-Myd) were constructed and administered intramuscularly or intrademally in Swiss albino mice (on days 0, 7, and 21). Rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) titres were estimated in the mice sera on days 14 and 28 by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. The protective efficacy of the constructs was evaluated by an intracerebral challenge with challenge virus standard virus on day 35.
RESULTS
Co-expression of Myd88 increased RVNA responses to pIRES-Rgp by 3- and 2-folds, following intramuscular and intradermal immunization, respectively. pIRES-Rgp protected 80% of the mice following intramuscular and intradermal immunizations, while pIRES-Rgp-Myd afforded 100% protection following similar administrations.
CONCLUSION
Genetic adjuvanting with Myd88 enhanced the RVNA responses and protective efficacy of a plasmid DNA rabies vaccine. This strategy might be useful for rabies vaccination of canines in the field, and needs further evaluation.

Keyword

Rabies; DNA vaccines; Adjuvants; Myeloid differentiation factor 88

MeSH Terms

Animals
Antibodies, Neutralizing
DNA*
Glycoproteins
Immunization
Mice
Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88
Plasmids*
Rabies
Rabies Vaccines*
Rabies virus
Toll-Like Receptors
Vaccination
Vaccines, DNA
Antibodies, Neutralizing
DNA
Glycoproteins
Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88
Rabies Vaccines
Toll-Like Receptors
Vaccines, DNA

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Scheme of plasmid constructs (linearized). (A) pIRES-Rgp. (B) pIRES-Rgp-Myd.

  • Fig. 2 Gel image showing polymerase chain reaction amplification of rabies virus glycoprotein gene. Lane 1, lambda DNA/EcoRI+HindIII marker; lane 2, ~1.6 kb band indicative of full-length glycoprotein gene.

  • Fig. 3 Gel image showing polymerase chain reaction amplification of Myd88 gene fragment. Lane 1, GeneRuler 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 2, 891 bp band indicative of Myd88 gene fragment.

  • Fig. 4 Images of BHK-21 cells fluorescently stained for expression of G and MyD88. Cells were grown in 24-well plates and mock-transfected (A, B) or transfected with a liposomal complex of pIRES-Rgp-Myd (C, D). Forty-eight hours later, the cells were stained sequentially with a murine anti-G antibody and a rabbit polyclonal anti-Myd88 antibody, followed by species-specific secondary IgG conjugated with FITC or TRITC, respectively. Note the lack of specific fluorescence in mock-transfected cells, and the apple-green fluorescence (indicative of expression of G) and orange-red fluorescence (indicative of MyD88 expression) in pIRES-Rgp-Myd transfected cells, following staining (images at a total magnification of ×400).

  • Fig. 5 Graph showing the survival rates of immunized mice following an intracerebral challenge with CVS-11 strain of rabies virus. Results show data compiled from challenge study in the intramuscular and intradermal immunization groups. NS, normal saline.


Cited by  1 articles

Improvement of DNA vaccination by adjuvants and sophisticated delivery devices: vaccine-platforms for the battle against infectious diseases
Thomas Grunwald, Sebastian Ulbert
Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2015;4(1):1-10.    doi: 10.7774/cevr.2015.4.1.1.


Reference

1. Knobel DL, Cleaveland S, Coleman PG, et al. Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 83:360–368.
2. Rupprecht CE, Hanlon CA, Hemachudha T. Rabies re-examined. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002; 2:327–343.
Article
3. World Health Organization. Guidelines for dog rabies control. VH/83.43 Rev. 1. Geneva: WHO;1986.
4. Bahloul C, Taieb D, Diouani MF, et al. Field trials of a very potent rabies DNA vaccine which induced long lasting virus neutralizing antibodies and protection in dogs in experimental conditions. Vaccine. 2006; 24:1063–1072.
Article
5. Ullas PT, Desai A, Madhusudana SN. Rabies DNA vaccines: current status and future. World J Vaccines. 2012; 2:36–45.
Article
6. Barry ME, Pinto-Gonzalez D, Orson FM, McKenzie GJ, Petry GR, Barry MA. Role of endogenous endonucleases and tissue site in transfection and CpG-mediated immune activation after naked DNA injection. Hum Gene Ther. 1999; 10:2461–2480.
Article
7. Ulmer JB, Wahren B, Liu MA. Gene-based vaccines: recent technical and clinical advances. Trends Mol Med. 2006; 12:216–222.
Article
8. Ullas PT, Madhusudana SN, Desai A, et al. Enhancement of immunogenicity and efficacy of a plasmid DNA rabies vaccine by nanoformulation with a fourth-generation amine-terminated poly (ether imine) dendrimer. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014; 9:627–634.
9. Singh M, Briones M, Ott G, O'Hagan D. Cationic microparticles: a potent delivery system for DNA vaccines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97:811–816.
Article
10. Lodmell DL, Parnell MJ, Bailey JR, Ewalt LC, Hanlon CA. Rabies DNA vaccination of non-human primates: post-exposure studies using gene gun methodology that accelerates induction of neutralizing antibody and enhances neutralizing antibody titers. Vaccine. 2002; 20:2221–2228.
Article
11. Margalith M, Vilalta A. Sustained protective rabies neutralizing antibody titers after administration of cationic lipid-formulated pDNA vaccine. Genet Vaccines Ther. 2006; 4:2.
12. Bodles-Brakhop AM, Heller R, Draghia-Akli R. Electroporation for the delivery of DNA-based vaccines and immunotherapeutics: current clinical developments. Mol Ther. 2009; 17:585–592.
Article
13. Kaur M, Saxena A, Rai A, Bhatnagar R. Rabies DNA vaccine encoding lysosome-targeted glycoprotein supplemented with Emulsigen-D confers complete protection in preexposure and postexposure studies in BALB/c mice. FASEB J. 2010; 24:173–183.
Article
14. Xiang SD, Selomulya C, Ho J, Apostolopoulos V, Plebanski M. Delivery of DNA vaccines: an overview on the use of biodegradable polymeric and magnetic nanoparticles. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2010; 2:205–218.
Article
15. Nawwab Al-Deen FM, Selomulya C, Kong YY, et al. Design of magnetic polyplexes taken up efficiently by dendritic cell for enhanced DNA vaccine delivery. Gene Ther. 2014; 21:212–218.
Article
16. Kobiyama K, Jounai N, Aoshi T, et al. Innate immune signaling by, and genetic adjuvants for DNA vaccination. Vaccines. 2013; 1:278–292.
Article
17. Wales J, Andreakos E, Feldmann M, Foxwell B. Targeting intracellular mediators of pattern-recognition receptor signalling to adjuvant vaccination. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007; 35(Pt 6):1501–1503.
Article
18. Xiang Z, Ertl HC. Manipulation of the immune response to a plasmid-encoded viral antigen by coinoculation with plasmids expressing cytokines. Immunity. 1995; 2:129–135.
Article
19. Geissler M, Gesien A, Tokushige K, Wands JR. Enhancement of cellular and humoral immune responses to hepatitis C virus core protein using DNA-based vaccines augmented with cytokine-expressing plasmids. J Immunol. 1997; 158:1231–1237.
20. Tsuji T, Hamajima K, Ishii N, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of a plasmid expressing B7-2 on human immunodeficiency virus-1-specific cell-mediated immunity induced by a plasmid encoding the viral antigen. Eur J Immunol. 1997; 27:782–787.
Article
21. Xiang ZQ, He Z, Wang Y, Ertl HC. The effect of interferon-gamma on genetic immunization. Vaccine. 1997; 15:896–898.
22. Sin JI, Kim JJ, Ugen KE, Ciccarelli RB, Higgins TJ, Weiner DB. Enhancement of protective humoral (Th2) and cell-mediated (Th1) immune responses against herpes simplex virus-2 through co-delivery of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor expression cassettes. Eur J Immunol. 1998; 28:3530–3540.
Article
23. Pinto AR, Reyes-Sandoval A, Ertl HC. Chemokines and TRANCE as genetic adjuvants for a DNA vaccine to rabies virus. Cell Immunol. 2003; 224:106–113.
Article
24. Bramson JL, Dayball K, Hall JR, et al. Super-activated interferon-regulatory factors can enhance plasmid immunization. Vaccine. 2003; 21:1363–1370.
Article
25. O'Neill LA, Golenbock D, Bowie AG. The history of Toll-like receptors: redefining innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013; 13:453–460.
26. Genestier L, Taillardet M, Mondiere P, Gheit H, Bella C, Defrance T. TLR agonists selectively promote terminal plasma cell differentiation of B cell subsets specialized in thymus-independent responses. J Immunol. 2007; 178:7779–7786.
Article
27. O'Neill LA, Bowie AG. The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007; 7:353–364.
28. Rubtsov AV, Swanson CL, Troy S, Strauch P, Pelanda R, Torres RM. TLR agonists promote marginal zone B cell activation and facilitate T-dependent IgM responses. J Immunol. 2008; 180:3882–3888.
Article
29. Krieg AM. Toll-free vaccines? Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25:303–305.
Article
30. Takeshita F, Tanaka T, Matsuda T, et al. Toll-like receptor adaptor molecules enhance DNA-raised adaptive immune responses against influenza and tumors through activation of innate immunity. J Virol. 2006; 80:6218–6224.
Article
31. Smith JS, Yager PA, Baer GM. A rapid reproducible test for determining rabies virus-neutralizing antibody. In : Meslin FX, Kaplan MM, Koprowski H, editors. Laboratory techniques in rabies. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization;1996. p. 181–192.
32. Mintzer MA, Simanek EE. Nonviral vectors for gene delivery. Chem Rev. 2009; 109:259–302.
Article
33. Gururajan M, Jacob J, Pulendran B. Toll-like receptor expression and responsiveness of distinct murine splenic and mucosal B-cell subsets. PLoS One. 2007; 2:e863.
Article
34. Ha SA, Tsuji M, Suzuki K, et al. Regulation of B1 cell migration by signals through Toll-like receptors. J Exp Med. 2006; 203:2541–2550.
Article
35. Guay HM, Andreyeva TA, Garcea RL, Welsh RM, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E. MyD88 is required for the formation of long-term humoral immunity to virus infection. J Immunol. 2007; 178:5124–5131.
Article
36. von Bernuth H, Picard C, Jin Z, et al. Pyogenic bacterial infections in humans with MyD88 deficiency. Science. 2008; 321:691–696.
Article
37. Sheahan T, Morrison TE, Funkhouser W, et al. MyD88 is required for protection from lethal infection with a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV. PLoS Pathog. 2008; 4:e1000240.
Article
38. Neves P, Lampropoulou V, Calderon-Gomez E, et al. Signaling via the MyD88 adaptor protein in B cells suppresses protective immunity during Salmonella typhimurium infection. Immunity. 2010; 33:777–790.
Article
39. Kang SM, Yoo DG, Kim MC, et al. MyD88 plays an essential role in inducing B cells capable of differentiating into antibody-secreting cells after vaccination. J Virol. 2011; 85:11391–11400.
Article
40. Kaur M, Rai A, Bhatnagar R. Rabies DNA vaccine: no impact of MHC class I and class II targeting sequences on immune response and protection against lethal challenge. Vaccine. 2009; 27:2128–2137.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEVR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr