Blood Res.  2025;60:27. 10.1007/s44313-025-00076-4.

Real‑world data analysis of survival outcomes of patients with primary mediastinal large B‑cell lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy: the role of consolidative radiation therapy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology‑Oncology, Chun‑ gbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
  • 2Department of Pathol‑ ogy, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology‑Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Radiation therapy (RT) has served as the primary treatment option for PMBCL; however, its role has been questioned with the advent of intensified immunochemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the role of consolidative RT in the primary treatment of PMBCL.
Methods
This single-center retrospective study analyzed the survival outcomes of 65 patients newly diagnosed with PMBCL. The patients were divided into three treatment groups: (1) EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab), (2) R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), and (3) R-CHOP with consolidative RT.
Results
The objective response and complete remission rates were 86.2% and 63.1%, respectively, with 3-year pro‑ gression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 72% and 81%, respectively. All patients in the R-CHOP + RT group achieved an objective response with better PFS) than those who did not receive consolidative RT (p = 0.028), although there was no significant difference in OS (p = 0.102). Consolidative RT benefited patients with an initially bulky disease or insufficient end-of-treatment response. The predictive value of  18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positronemission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in assessing the treatment response in PMBCL was revali‑ dated, showing that patients who achieved negative end-of-treatment PET-CT had significantly better survival outcomes than others.
Conclusions
R-CHOP is a useful alternative regimen when intensified chemotherapy is not feasible. Consolidative RT should be considered in cases with an initially bulky disease and insufficient end-of-treatment response.

Keyword

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma; Front-line immunochemotherapy; Radiation therapy; Consolidative treatment

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow diagram of the study population

  • Fig. 2 Overall achievement of an objective response and/or complete response (A). Comparison of responses to the three primary treatment regimens (B). Kaplan–Meier curves of progression-free survival (PFS) (C) and overall survival (OS) (D) according to primary treatment. Comparison of PFS (E) and OS (F) according to the three primary treatment regimens. Comparison of PFS (G) and OS (H) according to radiation therapy in patients with bulky disease at diagnosis

  • Fig. 3 End-of-treatment (EOT) PET-CT) results according to radiation therapy (RT) in patients treated with R-CHOP (A). Sankey diagram of patients treated with R-CHOP showing interim and EOT PET-CT responses (B). Comparison of interim and EOT PET-CT responses according to RT in patients treated with R-CHOP (C). Comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) (D) and overall survival (OS) (E) according to interim PET-CT findings. Comparison of PFS (F) and OS (G) according to EOT PET-CT findings. Comparison of PFS (H) and OS (I) according to the interim and EOT PET-CT findings. Comparison of PFS (J) and OS (K) according to RT administration in patients with DS 3 and 4. PET-CT; positron emission tomography-computed tomography, R-CHOP; rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, DS; Deauville scale

  • Fig. 4 Comparison of disease relapse among the three primary treatment modality groups (A). Swimmer plot of relapsed patients (B). Comparison of overall survival (OS) according to patterns of disease relapse (C). Sankey diagram showing the PET-CT response and disease relapse (D). Kaplan–Meier curves of OS of patients with disease relapse (E). PET-CT; positron emission tomography-computed tomography

  • Fig. 5 Swimmer plot of relapsed patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors


Reference

References

1. Campo E, Swerdlow SH, Harris NL, Pileri S, Stein H, Jaffe ES. The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applications. Blood. 2011; 117(19):5019–5032. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-293050. PMID: 21300984. PMCID: 3109529.
Article
2. Savage KJ, Monti S, Kutok JL, Cattoretti G, Neuberg D, De Leval L, et al. The molecular signature of mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma differs from that of other diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and shares features with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2003; 102(12):3871–3879. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2003-06-1841. PMID: 12933571.
Article
3. Giulino-Roth L. How I treat primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2018; 132(8):782–790. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-04-791566. PMID: 29976557. PMCID: 6634954.
Article
4. Savage KJ, Al-Rajhi N, Voss N, Paltiel C, Klasa R, Gascoyne RD, et al. Favorable outcome of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma in a single institution: the British Columbia experience. Ann Oncol. 2006; 17(1):123–130. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdj030. PMID: 16236753.
Article
5. Zinzani PL, Martelli M, Bertini M, Gianni AM, Devizzi L, Federico M, et al. Induction chemotherapy strategies for primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma with sclerosis: a retrospective multinational study on 426 previously untreated patients. Haematologica. 2002; 87(12):1258–1264. PMID: 12495899.
6. Rieger M, Österborg A, Pettengell R, White D, Gill D, Walewski J, et al. Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP-like chemotherapy with or without rituximab: results of the Mabthera International Trial Group study. Ann Oncol. 2011; 22(3):664–670. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq418. PMID: 20724576.
Article
7. Lisenko K, Dingeldein G, Cremer M, Kriegsmann M, Ho AD, Rieger M, et al. Addition of rituximab to CHOP-like chemotherapy in first line treatment of primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. BMC Cancer. 2017; 17(1):359. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3332-3. PMID: 28532396. PMCID: 5440917.
Article
8. Jackson MW, Rusthoven CG, Jones BL, Kamdar M, Rabinovitch R. Improved survival with radiation therapy in stage I-II primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 94(1):126–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.017. PMID: 26547384.
Article
9. Jackson MW, Rusthoven CG, Jones BL, Kamdar M, Rabinovitch R. Improved survival with combined modality therapy in the modern era for primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2016; 91(5):476–480. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24325. PMID: 26852276.
Article
10. Savage KJ, Yenson PR, Shenkier T, Klasa R, Villa D, Goktepe O, et al. The outcome of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) in the R-CHOP treatment era. Blood. 2012; 120(21):303. DOI: 10.1182/blood.V120.21.303.303.
Article
11. Zinzani PL, Broccoli A, Casadei B, Stefoni V, Pellegrini C, Gandolfi L, et al. The role of rituximab and positron emission tomography in the treatment of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma: experience on 74 patients. Hematol Oncol. 2015; 33(4):145–150. DOI: 10.1002/hon.2172. PMID: 25256959.
Article
12. Dunleavy K, Pittaluga S, Maeda LS, Advani R, Chen CC, Hessler J, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH-rituximab therapy in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(15):1408–1416. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214561. PMID: 23574119. PMCID: 4568999.
Article
13. Moskowitz CH, Schöder H, Teruya-Feldstein J, Sima C, Iasonos A, Portlock CS, et al. Risk-adapted dose-dense immunochemotherapy determined by interim FDG-PET in advanced-stage diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(11):1896–1903. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.5942. PMID: 20212248. PMCID: 3651601.
Article
14. Cho J. Basic immunohistochemistry for lymphoma diagnosis. Blood Res. 2022; 57(S1):55–61. DOI: 10.5045/br.2022.2022037. PMID: 35483927. PMCID: 9057666.
Article
15. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(27):3059–3068. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800. PMID: 25113753. PMCID: 4979083.
Article
16. Meignan M, Gallamini A, Meignan M, Gallamini A, Haioun C. Report on the first international workshop on interim-PET-scan in lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009; 50(8):1257–1260. DOI: 10.1080/10428190903040048. PMID: 19544140.
Article
17. Zucca E, Davies A, Kryachok I, Ciccone G, Ceriani L, Botto B, et al. Observation vs. radiotherapy in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma patients with complete response to standard immunochemotherapy: the IELSG37 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(17_suppl):LBA7505. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.17_suppl.LBA7505.
Article
18. Chan EHL, Koh LP, Lee J, De Mel S, Jeyasekharan A, Liu X, et al. Real world experience of R-CHOP with or without consolidative radiotherapy vs DA-EPOCH-R in the first-line treatment of primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Med. 2019; 8(10):4626–4632. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2347. PMID: 31264808. PMCID: 6712459.
Article
19. Shah NN, Szabo A, Huntington SF, Epperla N, Reddy N, Ganguly S, et al. R-CHOP versus dose-adjusted R-EPOCH in frontline management of primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma: a multi-centre analysis. Br J Haematol. 2018; 180(4):534–544. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15051. PMID: 29265182.
Article
20. Meignan M. Quantitative FDG-PET: a new biomarker in PMBCL. Blood. 2015; 126(8):924–926. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-653386. PMID: 26294712.
Article
21. Ceriani L, Martelli M, Conconi A, Zinzani PL, Ferreri AJM, Botto B, et al. Prognostic models for primary mediastinal (thymic) B-cell lymphoma derived from 18-FDG PET/CT quantitative parameters in the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) 26 study. Br J Haematol. 2017; 178(4):588–591. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14728. PMID: 28485042.
Article
22. Jimenez-Ubieto A, Poza M, Martín-Muñoz A, Dorado S, Heredia Y, Sarandeses P, et al. Potential utility of circulating tumor DNA monitoring in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma treated with R-DA-EPOCH. Blood. 2021; 138(Supplement 1):4491. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-152376.
Article
23. Pang D, Jiang X, Huang L, Teng Y, Liu S, Chen F, et al. Ctdna monitoring in predicting relapse of primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2020; 136(Supplement 1):36. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-142349.
Article
24. Hayden AR, Tonseth P, Lee DG, Villa D, Gerrie AS, Scott DW, et al. Outcome of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma using R-CHOP: impact of a PET-adapted approach. Blood. 2020; 136(24):2803–2811. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019004296. PMID: 32603413.
Article
25. Vardhana S, Hamlin PA, Yang J, Zelenetz A, Sauter CS, Matasar MJ, et al. Outcomes of relapsed and refractory primary mediastinal (thymic) large B cell lymphoma treated with second-line therapy and intent to transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018; 24(10):2133–2138. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.06.009. PMID: 29909154. PMCID: 7517639.
Article
26. Zinzani PL, Ribrag V, Moskowitz CH, Michot JM, Kuruvilla J, Balakumaran A, et al. Safety and tolerability of pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed/refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2017; 130(3):267–270. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-12-758383. PMID: 28490569. PMCID: 5766837.
Article
27. Armand P, Rodig S, Melnichenko V, Thieblemont C, Bouabdallah K, Tumyan G, et al. Pembrolizumab in relapsed or refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(34):3291–3299. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01389. PMID: 31609651. PMCID: 6881098.
Article
28. Schubert ML, Bethge WA, Ayuk FA, von Bonin M, Vucinic V, Wagner-Drouet EM, et al. Outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel in PMBCL compare favorably with those in DLBCL: a GLA/DRST registry study. Blood Adv. 2023; 7(20):6191–6195. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011203. PMID: 37603595. PMCID: 10582836.
Article
29. Chiappella A, Casadei B, Chiusolo P, Di Rocco A, Ljevar S, Magni M, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel treatment is more effective in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphomas than in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas: the Italian CART-SIE study. Leukemia. 2024; 38(5):1107–1114. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02213-x. PMID: 38459167. PMCID: 11073993.
Article
30. Abramson JS, Solomon SR, Arnason J, Johnston PB, Glass B, Bachanova V, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: primary analysis of the phase 3 TRANSFORM study. Blood. 2023; 141(14):1675–1684. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022018730. PMID: 36542826.
Article
Full Text Links
  • BR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr