Intest Res.  2025 Jan;23(1):37-55. 10.5217/ir.2024.00089.

Optimizing 5-aminosalicylate for moderate ulcerative colitis: expert recommendations from the Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Australia
  • 3Division of Gastroenterology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 4Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 5The Gastroenterology Group, Gleneagles Hospital, Singapore
  • 6Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 7Department of Gastroenterology, Baragwanath Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • 8Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • 9South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • 10Division of Medical Gastroenterology, P. D. Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, India
  • 11Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  • 12Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • 13Global Health Program, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 14Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Singapore
  • 15Department of Gastroenterology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • 16Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 17Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 18Deparment of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 19Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 20Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 21Department of Gastroenterology, Yashoda Hospital, Hyderabad, India
  • 22Department of Gastroenterology, Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
  • 23Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 24Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
  • 25Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
  • 26Department of Gastroenterology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 27Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

Abstract

The lack of clear definition and classification for “moderate ulcerative colitis (UC)” creates ambiguity regarding the suitability of step-up versus top-down treatment approaches. In this paper, experts address crucial gaps in assessing and managing moderate UC. The Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition comprised 24 experts who convened to share, discuss and vote electronically on management recommendations for moderate UC. Experts emphasized that the goal of treating UC is to attain clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission using cost-effective strategies such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), well-tolerated therapy that can be optimized to improve outcomes. Experts agreed that 5-ASA therapy could be optimized by maximizing dosage (4 g/day for induction of remission), combining oral and topical administration, extending treatment duration beyond 8 weeks, and enhancing patient adherence through personalized counselling and reduced pill burden. Treatment escalation should ideally be reserved for patients with predictors of aggressive disease or those who do not respond to 5-ASA optimization. Premature treatment escalation to advanced therapies (including biologics and oral small molecules) may have long-term health and financial consequences. This paper provides consensus-based expert recommendations and a treatment algorithm, based on current evidence and practices, to assist decision-making in real-world settings.

Keyword

Ulcerative colitis; 5-Aminosalicylates; Treatment optimization; Inflammatory bowel diseases

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Proposed treatment algorithm for patients with moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). aAccording to modified Truelove and Witts criteria: 4–6 bowel movements/day, temperature ≤37.8°C, pulse ≤90 beats/min, hemoglobin ≥10.5 g/dL, and C-reactive protein ≤30 mg/L. Additional assessments to measure disease activity may take into account clinical presentation, patient-reported symptoms, and objective/ laboratory criteria. In the absence of a validated definition for moderate UC, classification of moderate UC is subject to physicians’ preferences and judgement; bThe weightage for each predictor varies, and management strategies are determined at the physician’s discretion; cRectal 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) at a dose of ≥1 g/day at induction is recommended for patients with distal UC, specifically those with proctosigmoiditis or proctitis; dIf 5-ASA dose has been maximized to ≥4 g/day, and topical 5-ASA therapy has been added and similarly optimized (e.g., ≥1 g/day rectal 5-ASA), also optimize patient adherence, extend treatment duration, and switch 5-ASA formulation [17]; eBudesonide multimatrix (MMX) can be considered before systemic corticosteroids. In some areas, beclomethasone dipropionate is being used instead of budesonide MMX; fEarly escalation to immunomodulators such as thiopurine may be required for patients who are intolerant of 5-ASA or with specific strong predictors of aggressive disease; gFor patients with predictors of aggressive disease, consider adding 30–40 mg/day oral corticosteroids to 5-ASA. For patients with an inadequate response to 5-ASA therapy, an add-on dose of ≥40 mg/day oral corticosteroids could be considered; hInadequate response: failure to achieve ≥50% decrease in rectal bleeding and stool frequency, per an adaptation of STRIDE-II consensus recommendations [49]; iRelapse: failure to achieve rectal bleeding=0, stool frequency=0, or Mayo Endoscopic Subscore <3, per an adaptation of STRIDE-II consensus recommendations [49]; jFor maintenance therapy in moderate endoscopic activity: after tapering corticosteroids, an immunomodulator such as thiopurine should be considered in addition to 5-ASA; kFor corticosteroid-dependent patients: 5-ASA (particularly topical) can be continued for symptom control until onset of action of treatment, for chemoprotective effects, to meet reimbursement criteria, to control disease activity after de-escalation/treatment holiday, or if patient prefers. IV, intravenous; STRIDE, Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Adapted from Le Berre C, et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2020;20:363-378, with permission from Taylor & Francis [45].


Reference

1. Ko CW, Singh S, Feuerstein JD, et al. AGA clinical practice guidelines on the management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2019; 156:748–764.
2. Raine T, Bonovas S, Burisch J, et al. ECCO guidelines on therapeutics in ulcerative colitis: medical treatment. J Crohns Colitis. 2022; 16:2–17.
3. Wang Q, Chen MR, Hao JW, et al. AB1675 Deep phenotyping of immune microenvironment in ulcerative colitis by integrative systems analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023; 82:2074–2075.
4. Mortlock S, Lord A, Montgomery G, et al. An extremes of phenotype approach confirms significant genetic heterogeneity in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2023; 17:277–288.
5. Yang H, Rotter JI, Toyoda H, et al. Ulcerative colitis: a genetically heterogeneous disorder defined by genetic (HLA class II) and subclinical (antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies) markers. J Clin Invest. 1993; 92:1080–1084.
6. Ran Z, Wu K, Matsuoka K, et al. Asian Organization for Crohn’s and Colitis and Asia Pacific Association of Gastroenterology practice recommendations for medical management and monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease in Asia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 36:637–645.
7. Na SY, Choi CH, Song EM, et al. Korean clinical practice guidelines on biologics and small molecules for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Intest Res. 2023; 21:61–87.
8. Jakobsen C, Bartek J, Wewer V, et al. Differences in phenotype and disease course in adult and paediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 34:1217–1224.
9. Jess T, Riis L, Vind I, et al. Changes in clinical characteristics, course, and prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease during the last 5 decades: a population-based study from Copenhagen, Denmark. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007; 13:481–489.
10. Wang Y, Parker CE, Bhanji T, Feagan BG, MacDonald JK. Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 4:CD000543.
11. Truelove SC, Witts LJ. Cortisone in ulcerative colitis: final report on a therapeutic trial. Br Med J. 1955; 2:1041–1048.
12. Rutgeerts P, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al. Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353:2462–2476.
13. UEG week 2019 poster presentations. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019; 7(8_suppl):189–1030.
14. Chu X, Biao Y, Liu C, et al. Network meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of different biologics for ulcerative colitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023; 23:346.
15. Paridaens K, Fullarton JR, Travis SP. Efficacy of oral prolonged-release mesalazine in moderately active ulcerative colitis. JGH Open. 2023; 7:516–519.
16. Burisch J, Safroneeva E, Laoun R, Ma C. Lack of benefit for early escalation to advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis: critical appraisal of current evidence. J Crohns Colitis. 2023; 17:2002–2011.
17. Taylor KM, Irving PM. Optimization of conventional therapy in patients with IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 8:646–656.
18. Louis E, Paridaens K, Al Awadhi S, et al. Modelling the benefits of an optimised treatment strategy for 5-ASA in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2022; 9:e000853.
19. Chebli JM, Gaburri PD, Chebli LA, et al. A guide to prepare patients with inflammatory bowel diseases for anti-TNF-α therapy. Med Sci Monit. 2014; 20:487–498.
20. Mak JW, Sung JJ. The use of biologics and biosimilar in Asian patients with IBD: are we ready? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 34:1269–1270.
21. Mak JW, Ho AH, Ng SC. IBD barriers across the continents: East Asia. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023; 16:17562848231212089.
22. Farraj KL, Pellegrini JR, Munshi RF, et al. Chronic steroid use: an overlooked impact on patients with inflammatory bowel disease. JGH Open. 2022; 6:910–914.
23. Indo-Pacific Centre for Health Security. State of the region 2019: health security in the Indo-Pacific [Internet]. c2022. [cited 2024 Jun 1]. https://indopacifichealthsecurity.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-07/Indo-Pacific%20Health%20Security%20-%20State%20of%20the%20Region%202019.pdf.
24. Chakaya J, Petersen E, Nantanda R, et al. The WHO global tuberculosis 2021 report: not so good news and turning the tide back to End TB. Int J Infect Dis. 2022; 124 Suppl 1:S26–S29.
25. GBD 2019 Hepatitis B Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022; 7:796–829.
26. Panés J, Lindsay JO, Teich N, et al. Five-year safety data from OPUS, a European observational safety registry for adults with ulcerative colitis treated with originator infliximab [Remicade®] or conventional therapy. J Crohns Colitis. 2019; 13:1148–1157.
27. Wei SC. Differences in the public medical insurance systems for inflammatory bowel disease treatment in Asian countries. Intest Res. 2016; 14:218–223.
28. Low D, Swarup N, Okada T, Mizoguchi E. Landscape of inflammatory bowel disease in Singapore. Intest Res. 2022; 20:291–296.
29. Feuerstein JD, Nguyen GC, Kupfer SS, Falck-Ytter Y, Singh S; American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Guidelines Committee. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2017; 153:827–834.
30. Scott FI, Lichtenstein GR. Therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2014; 12:59–75.
31. Marsal J, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Blumenstein I, Cappello M, Bazin T, Sebastian S. Management of non-response and loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:897936.
32. Savelkoul EH, Thomas PW, Derikx LA, den Broeder N, Römkens TE, Hoentjen F. Systematic review and meta-analysis: loss of response and need for dose escalation of infliximab and adalimumab in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023; 29:1633–1647.
33. Shmidt E, Kochhar G, Hartke J, et al. Predictors and management of loss of response to vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018; 24:2461–2467.
34. Walmsley RS, Ayres RC, Pounder RE, Allan RN. A Simple clinical colitis activity index. Gut. 1998; 43:29–32.
35. Walsh AJ, Ghosh A, Brain AO, et al. Comparing disease activity indices in ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2014; 8:318–325.
36. Schroeder KW, Tremaine WJ, Ilstrup DM. Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis: a randomized study. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317:1625–1629.
37. Caron B, Jairath V, D’Amico F, et al. Definition of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis in clinical trials: a systematic literature review. United European Gastroenterol J. 2022; 10:854–867.
38. Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, Kornbluth A, et al. Delayed-release oral mesalamine at 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) for the treatment of moderately active ulcerative colitis: the ASCEND II trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100:2478–2485.
39. Sandborn WJ, Regula J, Feagan BG, et al. Delayed-release oral mesalamine 4.8 g/day (800-mg tablet) is effective for patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2009; 137:1934–1943.
40. Travis SP, Schnell D, Krzeski P, et al. Developing an instrument to assess the endoscopic severity of ulcerative colitis: the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS). Gut. 2012; 61:535–542.
41. Xie T, Zhang T, Ding C, et al. Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) versus Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) in guiding the need for colectomy in patients with acute severe colitis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018; 6:38–44.
42. Pabla BS, Schwartz DA. Assessing severity of disease in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2020; 49:671–688.
43. Kedia S, Ahuja V, Tandon R. Management of acute severe ulcerative colitis. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2014; 5:579–588.
44. Harbord M, Eliakim R, Bettenworth D, et al. Third European evidence-based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 2: current management. J Crohns Colitis. 2017; 11:769–784.
45. Le Berre C, Roda G, Nedeljkovic Protic M, Danese S, PeyrinBiroulet L. Modern use of 5-aminosalicylic acid compounds for ulcerative colitis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020; 20:363–378.
46. Kishi M, Hirai F, Takatsu N, et al. A review on the current status and definitions of activity indices in inflammatory bowel disease: how to use indices for precise evaluation. J Gastroenterol. 2022; 57:246–266.
47. Ooi CJ, Hilmi I, Banerjee R, et al. Best practices on immunomodulators and biologic agents for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in Asia. Intest Res. 2019; 17:285–310.
48. Heckman BW, Mathew AR, Carpenter MJ. Treatment burden and treatment fatigue as barriers to health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015; 5:31–36.
49. Turner D, Ricciuto A, Lewis A, et al. STRIDE-II: an update on the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) initiative of the International Organization for the study of IBD (IOIBD). Determining therapeutic goals for treat-to-target strategies in IBD. Gastroenterology. 2021; 160:1570–1583.
50. Viscido A, Valvano M, Stefanelli G, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: the advantage of endoscopic Mayo score 0 over 1 in patients with ulcerative colitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022; 22:92.
51. Min Ho PY, Hu W, Lee YY, et al. Health-related quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Singapore. Intest Res. 2019; 17:107–118.
52. Yarlas A, Willian MK, Nag A. The impact of clinical symptoms and endoscopic and histologic disease activity on health-related quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis following treatment with multimatrix mesalazine. Qual Life Res. 2021; 30:1925–1938.
53. Reinink AR, Lee TC, Higgins PD. Endoscopic mucosal healing predicts favorable clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016; 22:1859–1869.
54. Christensen B, Hanauer SB, Erlich J, et al. Histologic normalization occurs in ulcerative colitis and is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15:1557–1564.
55. Bryant RV, Burger DC, Delo J, et al. Beyond endoscopic mucosal healing in UC: histological remission better predicts corticosteroid use and hospitalisation over 6 years of follow-up. Gut. 2016; 65:408–414.
56. Patel KV, Salmon P, Marin-Jiménez I, et al. P416 The impact of remission on healthcare resource utilisation and costs amongst patients with inflammatory bowel disease in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. J Crohn Colitis. 2023; 17(Suppl 1):i544–i546.
57. Vaizey CJ, Gibson PR, Black CM, et al. Disease status, patient quality of life and healthcare resource use for ulcerative colitis in the UK: an observational study. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014; 5:183–189.
58. Lamb CA, Kennedy NA, Raine T, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut. 2019; 68:s1–s106.
59. Ouyang Q, Tandon R, Goh KL, et al. Management consensus of inflammatory bowel disease for the Asia-Pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 21:1772–1782.
60. Ling KL, Hilmi I, Raja Ali RA, et al. Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE) Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Working Party guidelines on IBD management during the COVID-19 pandemic. JGH Open. 2020; 4:320–323.
61. Fumery M, Singh S, Dulai PS, Gower-Rousseau C, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Sandborn WJ. Natural history of adult ulcerative colitis in population-based cohorts: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 16:343–356.
62. Ng SC, Zeng Z, Niewiadomski O, et al. Early course of inflammatory bowel disease in a population-based inception cohort study from 8 countries in Asia and Australia. Gastroenterology. 2016; 150:86–95.
63. Vegh Z, Burisch J, Pedersen N, et al. Incidence and initial disease course of inflammatory bowel diseases in 2011 in Europe and Australia: results of the 2011 ECCO-EpiCom inception cohort. J Crohns Colitis. 2014; 8:1506–1515.
64. Barberio B, Segal JP, Quraishi MN, Black CJ, Savarino EV, Ford AC. Efficacy of oral, topical, or combined oral and topical 5-aminosalicylates, in ulcerative colitis: systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis. 2021; 15:1184–1196.
65. Battat R, Duijvestein M, Guizzetti L, et al. Histologic healing rates of medical therapies for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019; 114:733–745.
66. Römkens TE, Kampschreur MT, Drenth JP, van Oijen MG, de Jong DJ. High mucosal healing rates in 5-ASA-treated ulcerative colitis patients: results of a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012; 18:2190–2198.
67. Ardizzone S, Cassinotti A, Duca P, et al. Mucosal healing predicts late outcomes after the first course of corticosteroids for newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 9:483–489.
68. Bokemeyer B, Hommes D, Gill I, Broberg P, Dignass A. Mesalazine in left-sided ulcerative colitis: efficacy analyses from the PODIUM trial on maintenance of remission and mucosal healing. J Crohns Colitis. 2012; 6:476–482.
69. Lichtenstein GR, Barrett AC, Bortey E, Paterson C, Forbes WP. Long-term safety and tolerability of once-daily mesalamine granules in the maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014; 20:1399–1406.
70. Sehgal P, Colombel JF, Aboubakr A, Narula N. Systematic review: safety of mesalazine in ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 47:1597–1609.
71. Burri E, Maillard MH, Schoepfer AM, et al. Treatment algorithm for mild and moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: an update. Digestion. 2020; 101 Suppl 1:2–15.
72. Katz S, Pasquale M. Daily dosing of delayed release mesalamine prior to immunosuppressive use. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104:S444.
73. Hiwatashi N, Suzuki Y, Mitsuyama K, Munakata A, Hibi T. Clinical trial: effects of an oral preparation of mesalazine at 4 g/day on moderately active ulcerative colitis. A phase III parallel-dosing study. J Gastroenterol. 2011; 46:46–56.
74. West R, Russel M, Bodelier A, et al. Lower risk of recurrence with a higher induction dose of mesalazine and longer duration of treatment in ulcerative colitis: results from the Dutch, non-interventional, IMPACT study. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2022; 31:18–24.
75. Paupard T, Gonzalez F, Caron B, Siproudhis L, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Real-world evidence of quality of life improvement in patients with distal ulcerative colitis treated by mesalazine: the Quartz study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022; 34:1203–1209.
76. Flourié B, Hagège H, Tucat G, et al. Randomised clinical trial: once- vs. twice-daily prolonged-release mesalazine for active ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 37:767–775.
77. Frieri G, Giacomelli R, Pimpo M, et al. Mucosal 5-aminosalicylic acid concentration inversely correlates with severity of colonic inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2000; 47:410–414.
78. De Vos M. Clinical pharmacokinetics of slow release mesalazine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000; 39:85–97.
79. Seibold F, Fournier N, Beglinger C, et al. Topical therapy is underused in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2014; 8:56–63.
80. Nguyen NH, Fumery M, Dulai PS, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological agents for management of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and network meta-analyses. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 3:742–753.
81. Marteau P, Probert CS, Lindgren S, et al. Combined oral and enema treatment with Pentasa (mesalazine) is superior to oral therapy alone in patients with extensive mild/moderate active ulcerative colitis: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study. Gut. 2005; 54:960–965.
82. Cohen RD, Woseth DM, Thisted RA, Hanauer SB. A metaanalysis and overview of the literature on treatment options for left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95:1263–1276.
83. Takeshima F, Matsumura M, Makiyama K, et al. Efficacy of long-term 4.0 g/day mesalazine (Pentasa) for maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis. Med Sci Monit. 2014; 20:1314–1318.
84. Chapman TP, Frias Gomes C, Louis E, Colombel JF, Satsangi J. Review article: withdrawal of 5-aminosalicylates in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020; 52:73–84.
85. Sood A, Ahuja V, Midha V, et al. Colitis and Crohn’s Foundation (India) consensus statements on use of 5-aminosalicylic acid in inflammatory bowel disease. Intest Res. 2020; 18:355–378.
86. Can G, Yozgat A, Tezel A, Ünsal G, Soylu AR. Beliefs about medicines and adherence to treatment in Turkish patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022; 33:743–750.
87. Bhatt J, Patil S, Joshi A, Abraham P, Desai D. Self-reported treatment adherence in inflammatory bowel disease in Indian patients. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2009; 28:143–146.
88. Kawakami A, Tanaka M, Nishigaki M, et al. Relationship between non-adherence to aminosalicylate medication and the risk of clinical relapse among Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission: a prospective cohort study. J Gastroenterol. 2013; 48:1006–1015.
89. Kim SB, Kim KO, Jang BI, et al. Patients’ beliefs and attitudes about their treatment for inflammatory bowel disease in Korea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 31:575–580.
90. Kane SV. Overcoming adherence issues in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2007; 3:795–799.
91. Kane SV. Systematic review: adherence issues in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 23:577–585.
92. Lee J, Jee SR, Kim HW, et al. Factors associated with low adherence to oral 5-aminosalicylic acid in patients with ulcerative colitis. PLoS One. 2019; 14:e0214129.
93. Nishikawa AM, Paladini L, Delfini R, Kotze PG, Clark O. Decision tree construction and cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment of ulcerative colitis with Pentasa® mesalazine 2 g sachet. Arq Gastroenterol. 2013; 50:297–303.
94. Kane S, Huo D, Aikens J, Hanauer S. Medication nonadherence and the outcomes of patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Am J Med. 2003; 114:39–43.
95. Perry J, Chen A, Kariyawasam V, et al. Medication non-adherence in inflammatory bowel diseases is associated with disability. Intest Res. 2018; 16:571–578.
96. Srivastava K, Arora A, Kataria A, Cappelleri JC, Sadosky A, Peterson AM. Impact of reducing dosing frequency on adherence to oral therapies: a literature review and meta-analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013; 7:419–434.
97. Dignass AU, Bokemeyer B, Adamek H, et al. Mesalamine once daily is more effective than twice daily in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 7:762–769.
98. Connolly MP, Nielsen SK, Currie CJ, Poole CD, Travis SP. An economic evaluation comparing once daily with twice daily mesalazine for maintaining remission based on results from a randomised controlled clinical trial. J Crohns Colitis. 2009; 3:32–37.
99. Laube R, Selinger C, Leong RW. Medication adherence in women with IBD of childbearing age likely associated with disease knowledge. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022; 15:17562848221144088.
100. de Jong MJ, Boonen A, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telemedicine-directed specialized vs standard care for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in a randomized trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18:1744–1752.
101. Elkjaer M, Shuhaibar M, Burisch J, et al. E-health empowers patients with ulcerative colitis: a randomised controlled trial of the web-guided ‘Constant-care’ approach. Gut. 2010; 59:1652–1661.
102. Severs M, Zuithoff PN, Mangen MJ, et al. Assessing self-reported medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease: a comparison of tools. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016; 22:2158–2164.
103. Tiao DK, Chan W, Jeganathan J, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease pharmacist adherence counseling improves medication adherence in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017; 23:1257–1261.
104. Nakagawa S, Okaniwa N, Mizuno M, et al. Treatment adherence in patients with ulcerative colitis is dependent on the formulation of 5-aminosalicylic acid. Digestion. 2019; 99:133–139.
105. Yagisawa K, Kobayashi T, Ozaki R, et al. Randomized, crossover questionnaire survey of acceptabilities of controlled-release mesalazine tablets and granules in ulcerative colitis patients. Intest Res. 2019; 17:87–93.
106. Hiraoka S, Fujiwara A, Toyokawa T, et al. Multicenter survey on mesalamine intolerance in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 36:137–143.
107. Suzuki K, Kakuta Y, Naito T, et al. Genetic background of mesalamine-induced fever and diarrhea in Japanese patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022; 28:21–31.
108. Campieri M, Ferguson A, Doe W, Persson T, Nilsson LG. Oral budesonide is as effective as oral prednisolone in active Crohn’s disease. The Global Budesonide Study Group. Gut. 1997; 41:209–214.
109. Bonovas S, Nikolopoulos GK, Lytras T, Fiorino G, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S. Comparative safety of systemic and lowbioavailability steroids in inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018; 84:239–251.
110. Danese S, Bonovas S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Budesonide MMX add-on to 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a favourable risk-benefit profile. J Crohns Colitis. 2017; 11:767–768.
111. Rubin DT, Cohen RD, Sandborn WJ, et al. Budesonide multimatrix is efficacious for mesalamine-refractory, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. J Crohns Colitis. 2017; 11:785–791.
112. Lichtenstein GR, Travis S, Danese S, et al. Budesonide MMX for the induction of remission of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: a pooled safety analysis. J Crohns Colitis. 2015; 9:738–746.
113. Ryrfeldt A, Andersson P, Edsbäcker S, Tönnesson M, Davies D, Pauwels R. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of budesonide, a selective glucocorticoid. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1982; 122:86–95.
114. Qiu X, Ma J, Wang K, Zhang H. Chemopreventive effects of 5-aminosalicylic acid on inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer and dysplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:1031–1045.
115. Hsiao SW, Yen HH, Chen YY. Chemoprevention of colitis-associated dysplasia or cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Liver. 2022; 16:840–848.
116. Velayos FS, Terdiman JP, Walsh JM. Effect of 5-aminosalicylate use on colorectal cancer and dysplasia risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100:1345–1353.
117. Ungaro RC, Limketkai BN, Jensen CB, et al. Stopping 5-aminosalicylates in patients with ulcerative colitis starting biologic therapy does not increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes: analysis of two nationwide population-based cohorts. Gut. 2019; 68:977–984.
Full Text Links
  • IR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr